Shifting gears versus sudden stops: qualitative study of consultations about driving in patients with cognitive impairment

ObjectiveGeneral practitioners (GPs) report finding consultations on fitness to drive (FtD) in people with cognitive impairment difficult and potentially damaging to the physician–patient relationship. We aimed to explore GP and patient experiences to understand how the negative impacts associated w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Colin Bradley, Carol Sinnott, Linda Horgan, Kathleen McLoughlin, Cormac Sheehan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/8/e024452.full
id doaj-096915ee500c4cf996fe191e2fe449ba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-096915ee500c4cf996fe191e2fe449ba2021-03-22T09:02:02ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552019-08-019810.1136/bmjopen-2018-024452Shifting gears versus sudden stops: qualitative study of consultations about driving in patients with cognitive impairmentColin Bradley0Carol SinnottLinda HorganKathleen McLoughlinCormac SheehanDepartment of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, IrelandObjectiveGeneral practitioners (GPs) report finding consultations on fitness to drive (FtD) in people with cognitive impairment difficult and potentially damaging to the physician–patient relationship. We aimed to explore GP and patient experiences to understand how the negative impacts associated with FtD consultations may be mitigated.MethodsIndividual qualitative interviews were conducted with GPs (n=12) and patients/carers (n=6) in Ireland. We recruited a maximum variation sample of GPs using criteria of length of time qualified, practice location and practice size. Patients with cognitive impairment were recruited via driving assessment services and participating general practices. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically by the multidisciplinary research team using an approach informed by the framework method.ResultsThe issue of FtD arose in consultations in two ways: introduced by GPs to proactively prepare patients for future driving cessation or by patients who urgently needed a medical report for an expiring driving license. The former strategy, implementable by GPs who had strong relational continuity with their patients, helped prevent crisis consultations from arising. The latter scenario became acrimonious if cognition had not been openly discussed with patients previously and was now potentially impacting on their right to drive. Patients called for greater clarity and empathy for the threat of driving cessation from their GPs.ConclusionGPs used their longitudinal relationship with cognitively impaired patients to reduce the potential for conflict in consultations on FtD. These efforts could be augmented by explicit discussion of cognitive impairment at an earlier stage for all affected patients. Patients would benefit from greater input into planning driving cessation and acknowledgement from their GPs of the impact this may have on their quality of life.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/8/e024452.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Colin Bradley
Carol Sinnott
Linda Horgan
Kathleen McLoughlin
Cormac Sheehan
spellingShingle Colin Bradley
Carol Sinnott
Linda Horgan
Kathleen McLoughlin
Cormac Sheehan
Shifting gears versus sudden stops: qualitative study of consultations about driving in patients with cognitive impairment
BMJ Open
author_facet Colin Bradley
Carol Sinnott
Linda Horgan
Kathleen McLoughlin
Cormac Sheehan
author_sort Colin Bradley
title Shifting gears versus sudden stops: qualitative study of consultations about driving in patients with cognitive impairment
title_short Shifting gears versus sudden stops: qualitative study of consultations about driving in patients with cognitive impairment
title_full Shifting gears versus sudden stops: qualitative study of consultations about driving in patients with cognitive impairment
title_fullStr Shifting gears versus sudden stops: qualitative study of consultations about driving in patients with cognitive impairment
title_full_unstemmed Shifting gears versus sudden stops: qualitative study of consultations about driving in patients with cognitive impairment
title_sort shifting gears versus sudden stops: qualitative study of consultations about driving in patients with cognitive impairment
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2019-08-01
description ObjectiveGeneral practitioners (GPs) report finding consultations on fitness to drive (FtD) in people with cognitive impairment difficult and potentially damaging to the physician–patient relationship. We aimed to explore GP and patient experiences to understand how the negative impacts associated with FtD consultations may be mitigated.MethodsIndividual qualitative interviews were conducted with GPs (n=12) and patients/carers (n=6) in Ireland. We recruited a maximum variation sample of GPs using criteria of length of time qualified, practice location and practice size. Patients with cognitive impairment were recruited via driving assessment services and participating general practices. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically by the multidisciplinary research team using an approach informed by the framework method.ResultsThe issue of FtD arose in consultations in two ways: introduced by GPs to proactively prepare patients for future driving cessation or by patients who urgently needed a medical report for an expiring driving license. The former strategy, implementable by GPs who had strong relational continuity with their patients, helped prevent crisis consultations from arising. The latter scenario became acrimonious if cognition had not been openly discussed with patients previously and was now potentially impacting on their right to drive. Patients called for greater clarity and empathy for the threat of driving cessation from their GPs.ConclusionGPs used their longitudinal relationship with cognitively impaired patients to reduce the potential for conflict in consultations on FtD. These efforts could be augmented by explicit discussion of cognitive impairment at an earlier stage for all affected patients. Patients would benefit from greater input into planning driving cessation and acknowledgement from their GPs of the impact this may have on their quality of life.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/8/e024452.full
work_keys_str_mv AT colinbradley shiftinggearsversussuddenstopsqualitativestudyofconsultationsaboutdrivinginpatientswithcognitiveimpairment
AT carolsinnott shiftinggearsversussuddenstopsqualitativestudyofconsultationsaboutdrivinginpatientswithcognitiveimpairment
AT lindahorgan shiftinggearsversussuddenstopsqualitativestudyofconsultationsaboutdrivinginpatientswithcognitiveimpairment
AT kathleenmcloughlin shiftinggearsversussuddenstopsqualitativestudyofconsultationsaboutdrivinginpatientswithcognitiveimpairment
AT cormacsheehan shiftinggearsversussuddenstopsqualitativestudyofconsultationsaboutdrivinginpatientswithcognitiveimpairment
_version_ 1724208993614692352