The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey Studies
The study summarizes the research literature on the effect of testing on student achievement, which comprises several hundred studies conducted from the early 20th century to the present day. Only survey studies, however, are included here (N studies = 247; N effects = 813; total respondent populati...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nonpartisan Education Group
2011-01-01
|
Series: | Nonpartisan Education Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Resources/SurveyList.htm |
id |
doaj-09615392f769460cb0f6f0876bd6a573 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-09615392f769460cb0f6f0876bd6a5732021-07-02T02:19:50ZengNonpartisan Education GroupNonpartisan Education Review2150-64772011-01-0173123The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey StudiesRichard P. PhelpsThe study summarizes the research literature on the effect of testing on student achievement, which comprises several hundred studies conducted from the early 20th century to the present day. Only survey studies, however, are included here (N studies = 247; N effects = 813; total respondent population . 700,000). Moreover, the surveys summarized here are limited to North America from the year 1958–2008. Surveys measure perceptions of effects—either through public opinion polls or surveys of groups selected within program evaluations. The mean effect size (for the perception that testing has a positive effect on achievement) exceeds +1.0, a very large effect. Effect sizes are relatively weaker, however, for situations in which one group is held accountable for the performance of another—holding either teachers or schools accountable for student scores. http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Resources/SurveyList.htmeducationpolicymeta-analysisresearch summarytestingeffect size |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Richard P. Phelps |
spellingShingle |
Richard P. Phelps The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey Studies Nonpartisan Education Review education policy meta-analysis research summary testing effect size |
author_facet |
Richard P. Phelps |
author_sort |
Richard P. Phelps |
title |
The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey Studies |
title_short |
The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey Studies |
title_full |
The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey Studies |
title_fullStr |
The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey Studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey Studies |
title_sort |
effect of testing on achievement: meta-analyses and research summary, 1910–2010. source list, effect sizes, and references for survey studies |
publisher |
Nonpartisan Education Group |
series |
Nonpartisan Education Review |
issn |
2150-6477 |
publishDate |
2011-01-01 |
description |
The study summarizes the research literature on the effect of testing on student achievement, which comprises several hundred studies conducted from the early 20th century to the present day. Only survey studies, however, are included here (N studies = 247; N effects = 813; total respondent population . 700,000). Moreover, the surveys summarized here are limited to North America from the year 1958–2008. Surveys measure perceptions of effects—either through public opinion polls or surveys of groups selected within program evaluations. The mean effect size (for the perception that testing has a positive effect on achievement) exceeds +1.0, a very large effect. Effect sizes are relatively weaker, however, for situations in which one group is held accountable for the performance of another—holding either teachers or schools accountable for student scores. |
topic |
education policy meta-analysis research summary testing effect size |
url |
http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Resources/SurveyList.htm |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT richardpphelps theeffectoftestingonachievementmetaanalysesandresearchsummary19102010sourcelisteffectsizesandreferencesforsurveystudies AT richardpphelps effectoftestingonachievementmetaanalysesandresearchsummary19102010sourcelisteffectsizesandreferencesforsurveystudies |
_version_ |
1721343436516229120 |