The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey Studies

The study summarizes the research literature on the effect of testing on student achievement, which comprises several hundred studies conducted from the early 20th century to the present day. Only survey studies, however, are included here (N studies = 247; N effects = 813; total respondent populati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richard P. Phelps
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nonpartisan Education Group 2011-01-01
Series:Nonpartisan Education Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Resources/SurveyList.htm
id doaj-09615392f769460cb0f6f0876bd6a573
record_format Article
spelling doaj-09615392f769460cb0f6f0876bd6a5732021-07-02T02:19:50ZengNonpartisan Education GroupNonpartisan Education Review2150-64772011-01-0173123The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey StudiesRichard P. PhelpsThe study summarizes the research literature on the effect of testing on student achievement, which comprises several hundred studies conducted from the early 20th century to the present day. Only survey studies, however, are included here (N studies = 247; N effects = 813; total respondent population . 700,000). Moreover, the surveys summarized here are limited to North America from the year 1958–2008. Surveys measure perceptions of effects—either through public opinion polls or surveys of groups selected within program evaluations. The mean effect size (for the perception that testing has a positive effect on achievement) exceeds +1.0, a very large effect. Effect sizes are relatively weaker, however, for situations in which one group is held accountable for the performance of another—holding either teachers or schools accountable for student scores. http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Resources/SurveyList.htmeducationpolicymeta-analysisresearch summarytestingeffect size
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard P. Phelps
spellingShingle Richard P. Phelps
The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey Studies
Nonpartisan Education Review
education
policy
meta-analysis
research summary
testing
effect size
author_facet Richard P. Phelps
author_sort Richard P. Phelps
title The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey Studies
title_short The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey Studies
title_full The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey Studies
title_fullStr The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey Studies
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Testing on Achievement: Meta-Analyses and Research Summary, 1910–2010. Source List, Effect Sizes, and References for Survey Studies
title_sort effect of testing on achievement: meta-analyses and research summary, 1910–2010. source list, effect sizes, and references for survey studies
publisher Nonpartisan Education Group
series Nonpartisan Education Review
issn 2150-6477
publishDate 2011-01-01
description The study summarizes the research literature on the effect of testing on student achievement, which comprises several hundred studies conducted from the early 20th century to the present day. Only survey studies, however, are included here (N studies = 247; N effects = 813; total respondent population . 700,000). Moreover, the surveys summarized here are limited to North America from the year 1958–2008. Surveys measure perceptions of effects—either through public opinion polls or surveys of groups selected within program evaluations. The mean effect size (for the perception that testing has a positive effect on achievement) exceeds +1.0, a very large effect. Effect sizes are relatively weaker, however, for situations in which one group is held accountable for the performance of another—holding either teachers or schools accountable for student scores.
topic education
policy
meta-analysis
research summary
testing
effect size
url http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Resources/SurveyList.htm
work_keys_str_mv AT richardpphelps theeffectoftestingonachievementmetaanalysesandresearchsummary19102010sourcelisteffectsizesandreferencesforsurveystudies
AT richardpphelps effectoftestingonachievementmetaanalysesandresearchsummary19102010sourcelisteffectsizesandreferencesforsurveystudies
_version_ 1721343436516229120