Characterization and error analysis of an N×N unfolding procedure applied to filtered, photoelectric x-ray detector arrays. I. Formulation and testing

An algorithm for spectral reconstructions (unfolds) and spectrally integrated flux estimates from data obtained by a five-channel, filtered x-ray-detector array (XRD) is described in detail and characterized. This diagnostic is a broad-channel spectrometer, used primarily to measure time-dependent s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. L. Fehl, G. A. Chandler, W. A. Stygar, R. E. Olson, C. L. Ruiz, J. J. Hohlfelder, L. P. Mix, F. Biggs, M. Berninger, P. O. Frederickson, R. Frederickson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2010-12-01
Series:Physical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.13.120402
id doaj-09481b3fe3fc4d288f6ff0eda4f5b654
record_format Article
spelling doaj-09481b3fe3fc4d288f6ff0eda4f5b6542020-11-25T01:35:45ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams1098-44022010-12-01131212040210.1103/PhysRevSTAB.13.120402Characterization and error analysis of an N×N unfolding procedure applied to filtered, photoelectric x-ray detector arrays. I. Formulation and testingD. L. FehlG. A. ChandlerW. A. StygarR. E. OlsonC. L. RuizJ. J. HohlfelderL. P. MixF. BiggsM. BerningerP. O. FredericksonR. FredericksonAn algorithm for spectral reconstructions (unfolds) and spectrally integrated flux estimates from data obtained by a five-channel, filtered x-ray-detector array (XRD) is described in detail and characterized. This diagnostic is a broad-channel spectrometer, used primarily to measure time-dependent soft x-ray flux emitted by z-pinch plasmas at the Z pulsed-power accelerator (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA), and serves as both a plasma probe and a gauge of accelerator performance. The unfold method, suitable for online analysis, arises naturally from general assumptions about the x-ray source and spectral properties of the channel responses; a priori constraints control the ill-posed nature of the inversion. The unfolded spectrum is not assumed to be Planckian. This study is divided into two consecutive papers. This paper considers three major issues: (a) Formulation of the unfold method.—The mathematical background, assumptions, and procedures leading to the algorithm are described: the spectral reconstruction S_{unfold}(E,t)—five histogram x-ray bins j over the x-ray interval, 137≤E≤2300  eV at each time step t—depends on the shape and overlap of the calibrated channel responses and on the maximum electrical power delivered to the plasma. The x-ray flux F_{unfold} is estimated as ∫S_{unfold}(E,t)dE. (b) Validation with simulations.—Tests of the unfold algorithm with known static and time-varying spectra are described. These spectra included—but were not limited to—Planckian spectra S_{bb}(E,T) (25≤T≤250  eV), from which noise-free channel data were simulated and unfolded. For Planckian simulations with 125≤T≤250  eV and typical responses, the binwise unfold values S_{j} and the corresponding binwise averages ⟨S_{bb}⟩_{j} agreed to ∼20%, except where S_{bb}≪max⁡{S_{bb}}. Occasionally, unfold values S_{j}≲0 (artifacts) were encountered. The algorithm recovered ≳90% of the x-ray flux over the wider range, 75≤T≤250  eV. For lower T, the test and unfolded spectra increasingly diverged as larger fractions of S_{bb}(E,T) fell below the detection threshold (∼137  eV) of the diagnostic. (c) Comparison with other analyses and diagnostics.—The results of the histogram algorithm are compared with other analyses, including a test with data acquired by the DANTE filtered-XRD array at the NOVA laser facility. Overall, the histogram algorithm is found to be most useful for x-ray flux estimates, as opposed to spectral details. The following companion paper [D. L. Fehl et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 13, 120403 (2010)PRABFM1098-4402] considers (a) uncertainties in S_{unfold} and F_{unfold} induced by both data noise and calibrational errors in the response functions; and (b) generalization of the algorithm to arbitrary spectra. These techniques apply to other diagnostics with analogous channel responses and supported by unfold algorithms of invertible matrix form.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.13.120402
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. L. Fehl
G. A. Chandler
W. A. Stygar
R. E. Olson
C. L. Ruiz
J. J. Hohlfelder
L. P. Mix
F. Biggs
M. Berninger
P. O. Frederickson
R. Frederickson
spellingShingle D. L. Fehl
G. A. Chandler
W. A. Stygar
R. E. Olson
C. L. Ruiz
J. J. Hohlfelder
L. P. Mix
F. Biggs
M. Berninger
P. O. Frederickson
R. Frederickson
Characterization and error analysis of an N×N unfolding procedure applied to filtered, photoelectric x-ray detector arrays. I. Formulation and testing
Physical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams
author_facet D. L. Fehl
G. A. Chandler
W. A. Stygar
R. E. Olson
C. L. Ruiz
J. J. Hohlfelder
L. P. Mix
F. Biggs
M. Berninger
P. O. Frederickson
R. Frederickson
author_sort D. L. Fehl
title Characterization and error analysis of an N×N unfolding procedure applied to filtered, photoelectric x-ray detector arrays. I. Formulation and testing
title_short Characterization and error analysis of an N×N unfolding procedure applied to filtered, photoelectric x-ray detector arrays. I. Formulation and testing
title_full Characterization and error analysis of an N×N unfolding procedure applied to filtered, photoelectric x-ray detector arrays. I. Formulation and testing
title_fullStr Characterization and error analysis of an N×N unfolding procedure applied to filtered, photoelectric x-ray detector arrays. I. Formulation and testing
title_full_unstemmed Characterization and error analysis of an N×N unfolding procedure applied to filtered, photoelectric x-ray detector arrays. I. Formulation and testing
title_sort characterization and error analysis of an n×n unfolding procedure applied to filtered, photoelectric x-ray detector arrays. i. formulation and testing
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams
issn 1098-4402
publishDate 2010-12-01
description An algorithm for spectral reconstructions (unfolds) and spectrally integrated flux estimates from data obtained by a five-channel, filtered x-ray-detector array (XRD) is described in detail and characterized. This diagnostic is a broad-channel spectrometer, used primarily to measure time-dependent soft x-ray flux emitted by z-pinch plasmas at the Z pulsed-power accelerator (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA), and serves as both a plasma probe and a gauge of accelerator performance. The unfold method, suitable for online analysis, arises naturally from general assumptions about the x-ray source and spectral properties of the channel responses; a priori constraints control the ill-posed nature of the inversion. The unfolded spectrum is not assumed to be Planckian. This study is divided into two consecutive papers. This paper considers three major issues: (a) Formulation of the unfold method.—The mathematical background, assumptions, and procedures leading to the algorithm are described: the spectral reconstruction S_{unfold}(E,t)—five histogram x-ray bins j over the x-ray interval, 137≤E≤2300  eV at each time step t—depends on the shape and overlap of the calibrated channel responses and on the maximum electrical power delivered to the plasma. The x-ray flux F_{unfold} is estimated as ∫S_{unfold}(E,t)dE. (b) Validation with simulations.—Tests of the unfold algorithm with known static and time-varying spectra are described. These spectra included—but were not limited to—Planckian spectra S_{bb}(E,T) (25≤T≤250  eV), from which noise-free channel data were simulated and unfolded. For Planckian simulations with 125≤T≤250  eV and typical responses, the binwise unfold values S_{j} and the corresponding binwise averages ⟨S_{bb}⟩_{j} agreed to ∼20%, except where S_{bb}≪max⁡{S_{bb}}. Occasionally, unfold values S_{j}≲0 (artifacts) were encountered. The algorithm recovered ≳90% of the x-ray flux over the wider range, 75≤T≤250  eV. For lower T, the test and unfolded spectra increasingly diverged as larger fractions of S_{bb}(E,T) fell below the detection threshold (∼137  eV) of the diagnostic. (c) Comparison with other analyses and diagnostics.—The results of the histogram algorithm are compared with other analyses, including a test with data acquired by the DANTE filtered-XRD array at the NOVA laser facility. Overall, the histogram algorithm is found to be most useful for x-ray flux estimates, as opposed to spectral details. The following companion paper [D. L. Fehl et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 13, 120403 (2010)PRABFM1098-4402] considers (a) uncertainties in S_{unfold} and F_{unfold} induced by both data noise and calibrational errors in the response functions; and (b) generalization of the algorithm to arbitrary spectra. These techniques apply to other diagnostics with analogous channel responses and supported by unfold algorithms of invertible matrix form.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.13.120402
work_keys_str_mv AT dlfehl characterizationanderroranalysisofannnunfoldingprocedureappliedtofilteredphotoelectricxraydetectorarraysiformulationandtesting
AT gachandler characterizationanderroranalysisofannnunfoldingprocedureappliedtofilteredphotoelectricxraydetectorarraysiformulationandtesting
AT wastygar characterizationanderroranalysisofannnunfoldingprocedureappliedtofilteredphotoelectricxraydetectorarraysiformulationandtesting
AT reolson characterizationanderroranalysisofannnunfoldingprocedureappliedtofilteredphotoelectricxraydetectorarraysiformulationandtesting
AT clruiz characterizationanderroranalysisofannnunfoldingprocedureappliedtofilteredphotoelectricxraydetectorarraysiformulationandtesting
AT jjhohlfelder characterizationanderroranalysisofannnunfoldingprocedureappliedtofilteredphotoelectricxraydetectorarraysiformulationandtesting
AT lpmix characterizationanderroranalysisofannnunfoldingprocedureappliedtofilteredphotoelectricxraydetectorarraysiformulationandtesting
AT fbiggs characterizationanderroranalysisofannnunfoldingprocedureappliedtofilteredphotoelectricxraydetectorarraysiformulationandtesting
AT mberninger characterizationanderroranalysisofannnunfoldingprocedureappliedtofilteredphotoelectricxraydetectorarraysiformulationandtesting
AT pofrederickson characterizationanderroranalysisofannnunfoldingprocedureappliedtofilteredphotoelectricxraydetectorarraysiformulationandtesting
AT rfrederickson characterizationanderroranalysisofannnunfoldingprocedureappliedtofilteredphotoelectricxraydetectorarraysiformulationandtesting
_version_ 1725066542054375424