Coordination between primary and secondary healthcare in Denmark and Sweden

Introduction: Insights into effective policy strategies for improved coordination of care is needed. In this study we describe and compare the policy strategies chosen in Denmark and Sweden, and discuss them in relation to interorganisational network theory. <br><br> Policy practice: The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Wadmann, Martin Strandberg-Larsen, Karsten Vrangbæk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2009-03-01
Series:International Journal of Integrated Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/302
id doaj-093ff503892b47c689faa9c48d8b49e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-093ff503892b47c689faa9c48d8b49e12020-11-24T21:05:26ZengUbiquity PressInternational Journal of Integrated Care1568-41562009-03-0191302Coordination between primary and secondary healthcare in Denmark and SwedenSarah WadmannMartin Strandberg-LarsenKarsten VrangbækIntroduction: Insights into effective policy strategies for improved coordination of care is needed. In this study we describe and compare the policy strategies chosen in Denmark and Sweden, and discuss them in relation to interorganisational network theory. <br><br> Policy practice: The policy initiatives to improve collaboration between primary and secondary healthcare in Denmark and Sweden include legislation and agreements aiming at clarifying areas of responsibility and defining requirements, creation of links across organisational boarders. In Denmark many initiatives have been centrally induced, while development of local solutions is more prominent in Sweden. Many Danish initiatives target the administrative level, while in Sweden initiatives are also directed at the operational level. In both countries economic incentives for collaboration are weak or lacking, and use of sanctions as a regulatory mean is limited. <br><br> Discussion and conclusion: Despite a variety of policy initiatives, lacking or poorly developed structures to support implementation function as barriers for coordination. The two cases illustrate that even in two relatively coherent health systems, with regional management of both the hospital and general practice sector, there are issues to resolve in regard to administrative and operational coordination. The interorganisational network literature can provide useful tools and concepts for interpreting such issues.http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/302coordinationprimary healthcare sectorsecondary healthcare sectorDenmarkSwedenpolicy initiativesbarriers
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah Wadmann
Martin Strandberg-Larsen
Karsten Vrangbæk
spellingShingle Sarah Wadmann
Martin Strandberg-Larsen
Karsten Vrangbæk
Coordination between primary and secondary healthcare in Denmark and Sweden
International Journal of Integrated Care
coordination
primary healthcare sector
secondary healthcare sector
Denmark
Sweden
policy initiatives
barriers
author_facet Sarah Wadmann
Martin Strandberg-Larsen
Karsten Vrangbæk
author_sort Sarah Wadmann
title Coordination between primary and secondary healthcare in Denmark and Sweden
title_short Coordination between primary and secondary healthcare in Denmark and Sweden
title_full Coordination between primary and secondary healthcare in Denmark and Sweden
title_fullStr Coordination between primary and secondary healthcare in Denmark and Sweden
title_full_unstemmed Coordination between primary and secondary healthcare in Denmark and Sweden
title_sort coordination between primary and secondary healthcare in denmark and sweden
publisher Ubiquity Press
series International Journal of Integrated Care
issn 1568-4156
publishDate 2009-03-01
description Introduction: Insights into effective policy strategies for improved coordination of care is needed. In this study we describe and compare the policy strategies chosen in Denmark and Sweden, and discuss them in relation to interorganisational network theory. <br><br> Policy practice: The policy initiatives to improve collaboration between primary and secondary healthcare in Denmark and Sweden include legislation and agreements aiming at clarifying areas of responsibility and defining requirements, creation of links across organisational boarders. In Denmark many initiatives have been centrally induced, while development of local solutions is more prominent in Sweden. Many Danish initiatives target the administrative level, while in Sweden initiatives are also directed at the operational level. In both countries economic incentives for collaboration are weak or lacking, and use of sanctions as a regulatory mean is limited. <br><br> Discussion and conclusion: Despite a variety of policy initiatives, lacking or poorly developed structures to support implementation function as barriers for coordination. The two cases illustrate that even in two relatively coherent health systems, with regional management of both the hospital and general practice sector, there are issues to resolve in regard to administrative and operational coordination. The interorganisational network literature can provide useful tools and concepts for interpreting such issues.
topic coordination
primary healthcare sector
secondary healthcare sector
Denmark
Sweden
policy initiatives
barriers
url http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/302
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahwadmann coordinationbetweenprimaryandsecondaryhealthcareindenmarkandsweden
AT martinstrandberglarsen coordinationbetweenprimaryandsecondaryhealthcareindenmarkandsweden
AT karstenvrangbæk coordinationbetweenprimaryandsecondaryhealthcareindenmarkandsweden
_version_ 1716768717653671936