L’évaluation des réseaux de circulation en géographie quantitative

Circulation networks are often implied in spatial phenomena, since they highlight displacements or relationships of places on territories. To analyse such phenomena, specifics tools are needed, in particular indicators coming from quantitative geography. Nevertheless, these indicators are often defi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jean-François Gleyze
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme 2009-03-01
Series:Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/nda/671
id doaj-09245bd42f934d02bcefb09b7dcea82c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-09245bd42f934d02bcefb09b7dcea82c2020-11-25T01:50:13ZfraEditions de la Maison des Sciences de l'HommeLes Nouvelles de l’Archéologie0242-77022425-19412009-03-01115354410.4000/nda.671L’évaluation des réseaux de circulation en géographie quantitativeJean-François GleyzeCirculation networks are often implied in spatial phenomena, since they highlight displacements or relationships of places on territories. To analyse such phenomena, specifics tools are needed, in particular indicators coming from quantitative geography. Nevertheless, these indicators are often defined in thematic studies, and do not put forward a generic approach which would help to extract the intrinsic network properties and to draw up new indicators. Making this observation, we propose to develop a framework based on the study of the network structure, combining its topological, geometrical and metrical information. In focusing on the analysis of the paths offered by the network to carry out the relations between origin and destination nodes, this framework is relevant to highlight the network relational potentialities, i.e. its ability to link the different places on the territory. The process we use to draw up structural indicators helps not only to rebuild and reinterpret the traditional indicators supplied by quantitative geography (accessibility, betweenness), but also to build new indicators: in that respect, we explain this process for two indicators, describing on the one hand the network paths supply (paths number) and on the other hand the spatial range of relations in which the network nodes are implied (proximal radius). This process can be extended to analyse any property observable at the path level.http://journals.openedition.org/nda/671accessibilitybetweennessindicatorsnetworkspathsstructure
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jean-François Gleyze
spellingShingle Jean-François Gleyze
L’évaluation des réseaux de circulation en géographie quantitative
Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie
accessibility
betweenness
indicators
networks
paths
structure
author_facet Jean-François Gleyze
author_sort Jean-François Gleyze
title L’évaluation des réseaux de circulation en géographie quantitative
title_short L’évaluation des réseaux de circulation en géographie quantitative
title_full L’évaluation des réseaux de circulation en géographie quantitative
title_fullStr L’évaluation des réseaux de circulation en géographie quantitative
title_full_unstemmed L’évaluation des réseaux de circulation en géographie quantitative
title_sort l’évaluation des réseaux de circulation en géographie quantitative
publisher Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme
series Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie
issn 0242-7702
2425-1941
publishDate 2009-03-01
description Circulation networks are often implied in spatial phenomena, since they highlight displacements or relationships of places on territories. To analyse such phenomena, specifics tools are needed, in particular indicators coming from quantitative geography. Nevertheless, these indicators are often defined in thematic studies, and do not put forward a generic approach which would help to extract the intrinsic network properties and to draw up new indicators. Making this observation, we propose to develop a framework based on the study of the network structure, combining its topological, geometrical and metrical information. In focusing on the analysis of the paths offered by the network to carry out the relations between origin and destination nodes, this framework is relevant to highlight the network relational potentialities, i.e. its ability to link the different places on the territory. The process we use to draw up structural indicators helps not only to rebuild and reinterpret the traditional indicators supplied by quantitative geography (accessibility, betweenness), but also to build new indicators: in that respect, we explain this process for two indicators, describing on the one hand the network paths supply (paths number) and on the other hand the spatial range of relations in which the network nodes are implied (proximal radius). This process can be extended to analyse any property observable at the path level.
topic accessibility
betweenness
indicators
networks
paths
structure
url http://journals.openedition.org/nda/671
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanfrancoisgleyze levaluationdesreseauxdecirculationengeographiequantitative
_version_ 1725003046900989952