Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit

Objectives. Automated, microprocessor-controlled, closed-loop mechanical ventilation has been used in our Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) at the Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center for the past 15 years; for 10 years it has been the primary (preferred) ventilator modality. Design and se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sigal Sviri, Abed Bayya, Phillip Levin, Rabia Khalaila, Ilana Stav, David Linton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Health and Medical Publishing Group 2012-08-01
Series:Southern African Journal of Critical Care
Online Access:http://www.sajcc.org.za/index.php/sajcc/article/download/130/141
id doaj-0918bc3ce77443fe8607847e7de0df8d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0918bc3ce77443fe8607847e7de0df8d2020-11-25T00:55:05ZengHealth and Medical Publishing GroupSouthern African Journal of Critical Care1562-82642078-676X2012-08-0128161410.7196/SAJCC.130Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unitSigal SviriAbed BayyaPhillip LevinRabia KhalailaIlana StavDavid LintonObjectives. Automated, microprocessor-controlled, closed-loop mechanical ventilation has been used in our Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) at the Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center for the past 15 years; for 10 years it has been the primary (preferred) ventilator modality. Design and setting. We describe our clinical experience with adaptive support ventilation (ASV) over a 6-year period, during which time ASV-enabled ventilators became more readily available and were used as the primary (preferred) ventilators for all patients admitted to the MICU. Results. During the study period, 1 220 patients were ventilated in the MICU. Most patients (84%) were ventilated with ASV on admission. The median duration of ventilation with ASV was 6 days. The weaning success rate was 81%, and tracheostomy was required in 13%. Sixty-eight patients (6%) with severe hypoxia and high inspiratory pressures were placed on pressure-controlled ventilation, in most cases to satisfy a technical requirement for precise and conservative administration of inhaled nitric oxide. The overall pneumothorax rate was less than 3%, and less than 1% of patients who were ventilated only using ASV developed pneumothorax. Conclusions. ASV is a safe and acceptable mode of ventilation for complicated medical patients, with a lower than usual ventilation complication rate.http://www.sajcc.org.za/index.php/sajcc/article/download/130/141
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sigal Sviri
Abed Bayya
Phillip Levin
Rabia Khalaila
Ilana Stav
David Linton
spellingShingle Sigal Sviri
Abed Bayya
Phillip Levin
Rabia Khalaila
Ilana Stav
David Linton
Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit
Southern African Journal of Critical Care
author_facet Sigal Sviri
Abed Bayya
Phillip Levin
Rabia Khalaila
Ilana Stav
David Linton
author_sort Sigal Sviri
title Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit
title_short Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit
title_full Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit
title_fullStr Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit
title_sort intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit
publisher Health and Medical Publishing Group
series Southern African Journal of Critical Care
issn 1562-8264
2078-676X
publishDate 2012-08-01
description Objectives. Automated, microprocessor-controlled, closed-loop mechanical ventilation has been used in our Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) at the Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center for the past 15 years; for 10 years it has been the primary (preferred) ventilator modality. Design and setting. We describe our clinical experience with adaptive support ventilation (ASV) over a 6-year period, during which time ASV-enabled ventilators became more readily available and were used as the primary (preferred) ventilators for all patients admitted to the MICU. Results. During the study period, 1 220 patients were ventilated in the MICU. Most patients (84%) were ventilated with ASV on admission. The median duration of ventilation with ASV was 6 days. The weaning success rate was 81%, and tracheostomy was required in 13%. Sixty-eight patients (6%) with severe hypoxia and high inspiratory pressures were placed on pressure-controlled ventilation, in most cases to satisfy a technical requirement for precise and conservative administration of inhaled nitric oxide. The overall pneumothorax rate was less than 3%, and less than 1% of patients who were ventilated only using ASV developed pneumothorax. Conclusions. ASV is a safe and acceptable mode of ventilation for complicated medical patients, with a lower than usual ventilation complication rate.
url http://www.sajcc.org.za/index.php/sajcc/article/download/130/141
work_keys_str_mv AT sigalsviri intelligentventilationintheintensivecareunit
AT abedbayya intelligentventilationintheintensivecareunit
AT philliplevin intelligentventilationintheintensivecareunit
AT rabiakhalaila intelligentventilationintheintensivecareunit
AT ilanastav intelligentventilationintheintensivecareunit
AT davidlinton intelligentventilationintheintensivecareunit
_version_ 1725232140125208576