Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit
Objectives. Automated, microprocessor-controlled, closed-loop mechanical ventilation has been used in our Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) at the Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center for the past 15 years; for 10 years it has been the primary (preferred) ventilator modality. Design and se...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Health and Medical Publishing Group
2012-08-01
|
Series: | Southern African Journal of Critical Care |
Online Access: | http://www.sajcc.org.za/index.php/sajcc/article/download/130/141 |
id |
doaj-0918bc3ce77443fe8607847e7de0df8d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0918bc3ce77443fe8607847e7de0df8d2020-11-25T00:55:05ZengHealth and Medical Publishing GroupSouthern African Journal of Critical Care1562-82642078-676X2012-08-0128161410.7196/SAJCC.130Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unitSigal SviriAbed BayyaPhillip LevinRabia KhalailaIlana StavDavid LintonObjectives. Automated, microprocessor-controlled, closed-loop mechanical ventilation has been used in our Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) at the Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center for the past 15 years; for 10 years it has been the primary (preferred) ventilator modality. Design and setting. We describe our clinical experience with adaptive support ventilation (ASV) over a 6-year period, during which time ASV-enabled ventilators became more readily available and were used as the primary (preferred) ventilators for all patients admitted to the MICU. Results. During the study period, 1 220 patients were ventilated in the MICU. Most patients (84%) were ventilated with ASV on admission. The median duration of ventilation with ASV was 6 days. The weaning success rate was 81%, and tracheostomy was required in 13%. Sixty-eight patients (6%) with severe hypoxia and high inspiratory pressures were placed on pressure-controlled ventilation, in most cases to satisfy a technical requirement for precise and conservative administration of inhaled nitric oxide. The overall pneumothorax rate was less than 3%, and less than 1% of patients who were ventilated only using ASV developed pneumothorax. Conclusions. ASV is a safe and acceptable mode of ventilation for complicated medical patients, with a lower than usual ventilation complication rate.http://www.sajcc.org.za/index.php/sajcc/article/download/130/141 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sigal Sviri Abed Bayya Phillip Levin Rabia Khalaila Ilana Stav David Linton |
spellingShingle |
Sigal Sviri Abed Bayya Phillip Levin Rabia Khalaila Ilana Stav David Linton Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit Southern African Journal of Critical Care |
author_facet |
Sigal Sviri Abed Bayya Phillip Levin Rabia Khalaila Ilana Stav David Linton |
author_sort |
Sigal Sviri |
title |
Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit |
title_short |
Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit |
title_full |
Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit |
title_fullStr |
Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit |
title_sort |
intelligent ventilation in the intensive care unit |
publisher |
Health and Medical Publishing Group |
series |
Southern African Journal of Critical Care |
issn |
1562-8264 2078-676X |
publishDate |
2012-08-01 |
description |
Objectives. Automated, microprocessor-controlled, closed-loop mechanical ventilation has been used in our Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) at the Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center for the past 15 years; for 10 years it has been the primary (preferred) ventilator modality.
Design and setting. We describe our clinical experience with adaptive support ventilation (ASV) over a 6-year period, during which time ASV-enabled ventilators became more readily available and were used as the primary (preferred) ventilators for all patients admitted to the MICU.
Results. During the study period, 1 220 patients were ventilated in the MICU. Most patients (84%) were ventilated with ASV on admission. The median duration of ventilation with ASV was 6 days. The weaning success rate was 81%, and tracheostomy was required in 13%. Sixty-eight patients (6%) with severe hypoxia and high inspiratory pressures were placed on pressure-controlled ventilation, in most cases to satisfy a technical requirement for precise and conservative administration of inhaled nitric oxide.
The overall pneumothorax rate was less than 3%, and less than 1% of patients who were ventilated only using ASV developed pneumothorax.
Conclusions. ASV is a safe and acceptable mode of ventilation for complicated medical patients, with a lower than usual ventilation complication rate. |
url |
http://www.sajcc.org.za/index.php/sajcc/article/download/130/141 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sigalsviri intelligentventilationintheintensivecareunit AT abedbayya intelligentventilationintheintensivecareunit AT philliplevin intelligentventilationintheintensivecareunit AT rabiakhalaila intelligentventilationintheintensivecareunit AT ilanastav intelligentventilationintheintensivecareunit AT davidlinton intelligentventilationintheintensivecareunit |
_version_ |
1725232140125208576 |