Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary prevention

Background: Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks is a common complication in Brugada syndrome. However, the incidence in recipients of ICD for primary and secondary prevention is unknown. Method and results: We compared the rate of inappropriate shocks in patients with B...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aimé Bonny, Mohammed A. Talle, Thibaut Vaugrenard, Jérôme Taieb, Marcus Ngantcha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-01-01
Series:Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629216313109
id doaj-0917b362522c4f7b9be510b1f9275a4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0917b362522c4f7b9be510b1f9275a4f2020-11-24T23:47:20ZengElsevierIndian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal0972-62922017-01-01171101510.1016/j.ipej.2016.10.010Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary preventionAimé Bonny0Mohammed A. Talle1Thibaut Vaugrenard2Jérôme Taieb3Marcus Ngantcha4Clinique Paul Picquet, Service de cardiologie, Sens, FranceDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri, NigeriaCentre Hospitalier d'Aix en Provence, Service de cardiologie, Aix en Provence, FranceCentre Hospitalier d'Aix en Provence, Service de cardiologie, FranceStatprest, Biostatistics Unit, Paris, FranceBackground: Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks is a common complication in Brugada syndrome. However, the incidence in recipients of ICD for primary and secondary prevention is unknown. Method and results: We compared the rate of inappropriate shocks in patients with Brugada syndrome that had an ICD for primary and secondary prevention. We studied 51 patients, 86.5% of whom were males. Their mean age at diagnosis was 47 ± 11 years. Eighteen (35%) were asymptomatic, while 25 (49%) experienced syncope prior to implantation. Eight (16%) patients were resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation before implantation. During a mean follow-up of 78 ± 46 months, none of the asymptomatic patients experienced appropriate therapy, whereas 21.6% of symptomatic patients had ≥1 shock. Inappropriate shock occurred in 7 (13.7%) patients, with a mean IS of 6.57 ± 6.94 shocks per patient occurring 16.14 ± 10.38 months after implantation. There was a trend towards higher incidence of inappropriate shock in the asymptomatic group (p = 0.09). The interval from implantation to inappropriate shock occurrence was 13.91 ± 12.98 months. The risk of IS at 3 years was 13.7%, which eventually plateaued over the time. Conclusion: Inappropriate shock is common in Brugada syndrome during the early periods after an ICD implantation, and seems to be more likely in asymptomatic patients. This finding may warrant a review of the indications for ICD implantation, especially in the young and apparently healthy population of patients with Brugada syndrome.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629216313109Implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorInappropriate shockBrugada syndrome
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aimé Bonny
Mohammed A. Talle
Thibaut Vaugrenard
Jérôme Taieb
Marcus Ngantcha
spellingShingle Aimé Bonny
Mohammed A. Talle
Thibaut Vaugrenard
Jérôme Taieb
Marcus Ngantcha
Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary prevention
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
Inappropriate shock
Brugada syndrome
author_facet Aimé Bonny
Mohammed A. Talle
Thibaut Vaugrenard
Jérôme Taieb
Marcus Ngantcha
author_sort Aimé Bonny
title Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary prevention
title_short Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary prevention
title_full Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary prevention
title_fullStr Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary prevention
title_full_unstemmed Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary prevention
title_sort inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in brugada syndrome: pattern in primary and secondary prevention
publisher Elsevier
series Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
issn 0972-6292
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Background: Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks is a common complication in Brugada syndrome. However, the incidence in recipients of ICD for primary and secondary prevention is unknown. Method and results: We compared the rate of inappropriate shocks in patients with Brugada syndrome that had an ICD for primary and secondary prevention. We studied 51 patients, 86.5% of whom were males. Their mean age at diagnosis was 47 ± 11 years. Eighteen (35%) were asymptomatic, while 25 (49%) experienced syncope prior to implantation. Eight (16%) patients were resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation before implantation. During a mean follow-up of 78 ± 46 months, none of the asymptomatic patients experienced appropriate therapy, whereas 21.6% of symptomatic patients had ≥1 shock. Inappropriate shock occurred in 7 (13.7%) patients, with a mean IS of 6.57 ± 6.94 shocks per patient occurring 16.14 ± 10.38 months after implantation. There was a trend towards higher incidence of inappropriate shock in the asymptomatic group (p = 0.09). The interval from implantation to inappropriate shock occurrence was 13.91 ± 12.98 months. The risk of IS at 3 years was 13.7%, which eventually plateaued over the time. Conclusion: Inappropriate shock is common in Brugada syndrome during the early periods after an ICD implantation, and seems to be more likely in asymptomatic patients. This finding may warrant a review of the indications for ICD implantation, especially in the young and apparently healthy population of patients with Brugada syndrome.
topic Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
Inappropriate shock
Brugada syndrome
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629216313109
work_keys_str_mv AT aimebonny inappropriateimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshocksinbrugadasyndromepatterninprimaryandsecondaryprevention
AT mohammedatalle inappropriateimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshocksinbrugadasyndromepatterninprimaryandsecondaryprevention
AT thibautvaugrenard inappropriateimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshocksinbrugadasyndromepatterninprimaryandsecondaryprevention
AT jerometaieb inappropriateimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshocksinbrugadasyndromepatterninprimaryandsecondaryprevention
AT marcusngantcha inappropriateimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshocksinbrugadasyndromepatterninprimaryandsecondaryprevention
_version_ 1725490271809961984