Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary prevention
Background: Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks is a common complication in Brugada syndrome. However, the incidence in recipients of ICD for primary and secondary prevention is unknown. Method and results: We compared the rate of inappropriate shocks in patients with B...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629216313109 |
id |
doaj-0917b362522c4f7b9be510b1f9275a4f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0917b362522c4f7b9be510b1f9275a4f2020-11-24T23:47:20ZengElsevierIndian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal0972-62922017-01-01171101510.1016/j.ipej.2016.10.010Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary preventionAimé Bonny0Mohammed A. Talle1Thibaut Vaugrenard2Jérôme Taieb3Marcus Ngantcha4Clinique Paul Picquet, Service de cardiologie, Sens, FranceDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri, NigeriaCentre Hospitalier d'Aix en Provence, Service de cardiologie, Aix en Provence, FranceCentre Hospitalier d'Aix en Provence, Service de cardiologie, FranceStatprest, Biostatistics Unit, Paris, FranceBackground: Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks is a common complication in Brugada syndrome. However, the incidence in recipients of ICD for primary and secondary prevention is unknown. Method and results: We compared the rate of inappropriate shocks in patients with Brugada syndrome that had an ICD for primary and secondary prevention. We studied 51 patients, 86.5% of whom were males. Their mean age at diagnosis was 47 ± 11 years. Eighteen (35%) were asymptomatic, while 25 (49%) experienced syncope prior to implantation. Eight (16%) patients were resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation before implantation. During a mean follow-up of 78 ± 46 months, none of the asymptomatic patients experienced appropriate therapy, whereas 21.6% of symptomatic patients had ≥1 shock. Inappropriate shock occurred in 7 (13.7%) patients, with a mean IS of 6.57 ± 6.94 shocks per patient occurring 16.14 ± 10.38 months after implantation. There was a trend towards higher incidence of inappropriate shock in the asymptomatic group (p = 0.09). The interval from implantation to inappropriate shock occurrence was 13.91 ± 12.98 months. The risk of IS at 3 years was 13.7%, which eventually plateaued over the time. Conclusion: Inappropriate shock is common in Brugada syndrome during the early periods after an ICD implantation, and seems to be more likely in asymptomatic patients. This finding may warrant a review of the indications for ICD implantation, especially in the young and apparently healthy population of patients with Brugada syndrome.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629216313109Implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorInappropriate shockBrugada syndrome |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aimé Bonny Mohammed A. Talle Thibaut Vaugrenard Jérôme Taieb Marcus Ngantcha |
spellingShingle |
Aimé Bonny Mohammed A. Talle Thibaut Vaugrenard Jérôme Taieb Marcus Ngantcha Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary prevention Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Inappropriate shock Brugada syndrome |
author_facet |
Aimé Bonny Mohammed A. Talle Thibaut Vaugrenard Jérôme Taieb Marcus Ngantcha |
author_sort |
Aimé Bonny |
title |
Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary prevention |
title_short |
Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary prevention |
title_full |
Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary prevention |
title_fullStr |
Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary prevention |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary prevention |
title_sort |
inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in brugada syndrome: pattern in primary and secondary prevention |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal |
issn |
0972-6292 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
Background: Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks is a common complication in Brugada syndrome. However, the incidence in recipients of ICD for primary and secondary prevention is unknown.
Method and results: We compared the rate of inappropriate shocks in patients with Brugada syndrome that had an ICD for primary and secondary prevention. We studied 51 patients, 86.5% of whom were males. Their mean age at diagnosis was 47 ± 11 years. Eighteen (35%) were asymptomatic, while 25 (49%) experienced syncope prior to implantation. Eight (16%) patients were resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation before implantation. During a mean follow-up of 78 ± 46 months, none of the asymptomatic patients experienced appropriate therapy, whereas 21.6% of symptomatic patients had ≥1 shock. Inappropriate shock occurred in 7 (13.7%) patients, with a mean IS of 6.57 ± 6.94 shocks per patient occurring 16.14 ± 10.38 months after implantation. There was a trend towards higher incidence of inappropriate shock in the asymptomatic group (p = 0.09). The interval from implantation to inappropriate shock occurrence was 13.91 ± 12.98 months. The risk of IS at 3 years was 13.7%, which eventually plateaued over the time.
Conclusion: Inappropriate shock is common in Brugada syndrome during the early periods after an ICD implantation, and seems to be more likely in asymptomatic patients. This finding may warrant a review of the indications for ICD implantation, especially in the young and apparently healthy population of patients with Brugada syndrome. |
topic |
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Inappropriate shock Brugada syndrome |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629216313109 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aimebonny inappropriateimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshocksinbrugadasyndromepatterninprimaryandsecondaryprevention AT mohammedatalle inappropriateimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshocksinbrugadasyndromepatterninprimaryandsecondaryprevention AT thibautvaugrenard inappropriateimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshocksinbrugadasyndromepatterninprimaryandsecondaryprevention AT jerometaieb inappropriateimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshocksinbrugadasyndromepatterninprimaryandsecondaryprevention AT marcusngantcha inappropriateimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshocksinbrugadasyndromepatterninprimaryandsecondaryprevention |
_version_ |
1725490271809961984 |