Interaction analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls

Back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls (BBMSEWs) are encountered in bridge approaches, ramp ways, rockfall protection systems, earth dams, levees and noise barriers. However, available design guidelines for BBMSEWs are limited and not applicable to numerical modeling when back-to-back wall...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sadok Benmebarek, Samir Attallaoui, Naïma Benmebarek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-10-01
Series:Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775516300476
id doaj-08ff60d56ba3444aa7e012f0e7188737
record_format Article
spelling doaj-08ff60d56ba3444aa7e012f0e71887372020-11-24T23:24:49ZengElsevierJournal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering1674-77552016-10-018569770210.1016/j.jrmge.2016.05.005Interaction analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth wallsSadok BenmebarekSamir AttallaouiNaïma BenmebarekBack-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls (BBMSEWs) are encountered in bridge approaches, ramp ways, rockfall protection systems, earth dams, levees and noise barriers. However, available design guidelines for BBMSEWs are limited and not applicable to numerical modeling when back-to-back walls interact with each other. The objective of this paper is to investigate, using PLAXIS code, the effects of the reduction in the distance between BBMSEW, the reinforcement length, the quality of backfill material and the connection of reinforcements in the middle, when the back-to-back walls are close. The results indicate that each of the BBMSEWs behaves independently if the width of the embankment between mechanically stabilized earth walls is greater than that of the active zone. This is in good agreement with the result of FHWA design guideline. However, the results show that the FHWA design guideline underestimates the lateral earth pressure when back-to-back walls interact with each other. Moreover, for closer BBMSEWs, FHWA design guideline strongly overestimates the maximum tensile force in the reinforcement. The investigation of the quality of backfill material shows that the minor increase in embankment cohesion can lead to significant reductions in both the lateral earth pressure and the maximum tensile force in geosynthetic. When the distance between the two earth walls is close to zero, the connection of reinforcement between back-to-back walls significantly improves the factor of safety.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775516300476Back-to-back wallsNumerical analysisGeosyntheticFactor of safetyLateral earth pressureMaximum tensile forceReinforcement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sadok Benmebarek
Samir Attallaoui
Naïma Benmebarek
spellingShingle Sadok Benmebarek
Samir Attallaoui
Naïma Benmebarek
Interaction analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Back-to-back walls
Numerical analysis
Geosynthetic
Factor of safety
Lateral earth pressure
Maximum tensile force
Reinforcement
author_facet Sadok Benmebarek
Samir Attallaoui
Naïma Benmebarek
author_sort Sadok Benmebarek
title Interaction analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls
title_short Interaction analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls
title_full Interaction analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls
title_fullStr Interaction analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls
title_full_unstemmed Interaction analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls
title_sort interaction analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
issn 1674-7755
publishDate 2016-10-01
description Back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls (BBMSEWs) are encountered in bridge approaches, ramp ways, rockfall protection systems, earth dams, levees and noise barriers. However, available design guidelines for BBMSEWs are limited and not applicable to numerical modeling when back-to-back walls interact with each other. The objective of this paper is to investigate, using PLAXIS code, the effects of the reduction in the distance between BBMSEW, the reinforcement length, the quality of backfill material and the connection of reinforcements in the middle, when the back-to-back walls are close. The results indicate that each of the BBMSEWs behaves independently if the width of the embankment between mechanically stabilized earth walls is greater than that of the active zone. This is in good agreement with the result of FHWA design guideline. However, the results show that the FHWA design guideline underestimates the lateral earth pressure when back-to-back walls interact with each other. Moreover, for closer BBMSEWs, FHWA design guideline strongly overestimates the maximum tensile force in the reinforcement. The investigation of the quality of backfill material shows that the minor increase in embankment cohesion can lead to significant reductions in both the lateral earth pressure and the maximum tensile force in geosynthetic. When the distance between the two earth walls is close to zero, the connection of reinforcement between back-to-back walls significantly improves the factor of safety.
topic Back-to-back walls
Numerical analysis
Geosynthetic
Factor of safety
Lateral earth pressure
Maximum tensile force
Reinforcement
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775516300476
work_keys_str_mv AT sadokbenmebarek interactionanalysisofbacktobackmechanicallystabilizedearthwalls
AT samirattallaoui interactionanalysisofbacktobackmechanicallystabilizedearthwalls
AT naimabenmebarek interactionanalysisofbacktobackmechanicallystabilizedearthwalls
_version_ 1725558612532658176