Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious Knowledge

This essay seeks to summarize and compare the theological ideas of Jonathan Edwards, a western philosopher, with those of Feyz Kashani, an eastern philosopher. The reason for this study is the numerous conjunctions that are seen in their ideas. These include the harmony of heart and reason in respec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saham Asadinia, Qorban Elmi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Religions and Denominations 2014-08-01
Series:Religious Inquiries
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ri.urd.ac.ir/article_14031_164c57b3b621da5fb76fb93a530fbf59.pdf
id doaj-08eafad2cf0d44de9804c93ef006bda7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-08eafad2cf0d44de9804c93ef006bda72020-11-25T01:13:47ZengUniversity of Religions and DenominationsReligious Inquiries2322-48942538-62712014-08-013651814031Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious KnowledgeSaham Asadinia0Qorban Elmi1PhD Candidate in philosophy of Religion and Modern Issues of Theology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, I.R.I.Associate Professor of University of Tehran, Faculty of TheologyThis essay seeks to summarize and compare the theological ideas of Jonathan Edwards, a western philosopher, with those of Feyz Kashani, an eastern philosopher. The reason for this study is the numerous conjunctions that are seen in their ideas. These include the harmony of heart and reason in respect to belief, the priority of the heart in the reflection of truth, the belief in centrality of the religion of heart, the necessity of divine grace in the flow of religious knowledge, the emphasis on the esoteric side of religion as opposed to the exoteric side, and the importance of a practical approach to religion. Significant differences also exist between their ideas. For instance, Edwards believes that human nature is sinful and corrupted while Feyz does not believe this is true. Furthermore, Feyz interprets the path of heart to be based on reason, while Edwards has a different point of view.http://ri.urd.ac.ir/article_14031_164c57b3b621da5fb76fb93a530fbf59.pdfreligious knowledgeheartreasonmoralityfeyz kashanijonathan edwards
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Saham Asadinia
Qorban Elmi
spellingShingle Saham Asadinia
Qorban Elmi
Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious Knowledge
Religious Inquiries
religious knowledge
heart
reason
morality
feyz kashani
jonathan edwards
author_facet Saham Asadinia
Qorban Elmi
author_sort Saham Asadinia
title Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious Knowledge
title_short Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious Knowledge
title_full Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious Knowledge
title_fullStr Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious Knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious Knowledge
title_sort feyz kashani and jonathan edwards on the place of heart in religious knowledge
publisher University of Religions and Denominations
series Religious Inquiries
issn 2322-4894
2538-6271
publishDate 2014-08-01
description This essay seeks to summarize and compare the theological ideas of Jonathan Edwards, a western philosopher, with those of Feyz Kashani, an eastern philosopher. The reason for this study is the numerous conjunctions that are seen in their ideas. These include the harmony of heart and reason in respect to belief, the priority of the heart in the reflection of truth, the belief in centrality of the religion of heart, the necessity of divine grace in the flow of religious knowledge, the emphasis on the esoteric side of religion as opposed to the exoteric side, and the importance of a practical approach to religion. Significant differences also exist between their ideas. For instance, Edwards believes that human nature is sinful and corrupted while Feyz does not believe this is true. Furthermore, Feyz interprets the path of heart to be based on reason, while Edwards has a different point of view.
topic religious knowledge
heart
reason
morality
feyz kashani
jonathan edwards
url http://ri.urd.ac.ir/article_14031_164c57b3b621da5fb76fb93a530fbf59.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sahamasadinia feyzkashaniandjonathanedwardsontheplaceofheartinreligiousknowledge
AT qorbanelmi feyzkashaniandjonathanedwardsontheplaceofheartinreligiousknowledge
_version_ 1725160000101285888