Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious Knowledge
This essay seeks to summarize and compare the theological ideas of Jonathan Edwards, a western philosopher, with those of Feyz Kashani, an eastern philosopher. The reason for this study is the numerous conjunctions that are seen in their ideas. These include the harmony of heart and reason in respec...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Religions and Denominations
2014-08-01
|
Series: | Religious Inquiries |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ri.urd.ac.ir/article_14031_164c57b3b621da5fb76fb93a530fbf59.pdf |
id |
doaj-08eafad2cf0d44de9804c93ef006bda7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-08eafad2cf0d44de9804c93ef006bda72020-11-25T01:13:47ZengUniversity of Religions and DenominationsReligious Inquiries2322-48942538-62712014-08-013651814031Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious KnowledgeSaham Asadinia0Qorban Elmi1PhD Candidate in philosophy of Religion and Modern Issues of Theology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, I.R.I.Associate Professor of University of Tehran, Faculty of TheologyThis essay seeks to summarize and compare the theological ideas of Jonathan Edwards, a western philosopher, with those of Feyz Kashani, an eastern philosopher. The reason for this study is the numerous conjunctions that are seen in their ideas. These include the harmony of heart and reason in respect to belief, the priority of the heart in the reflection of truth, the belief in centrality of the religion of heart, the necessity of divine grace in the flow of religious knowledge, the emphasis on the esoteric side of religion as opposed to the exoteric side, and the importance of a practical approach to religion. Significant differences also exist between their ideas. For instance, Edwards believes that human nature is sinful and corrupted while Feyz does not believe this is true. Furthermore, Feyz interprets the path of heart to be based on reason, while Edwards has a different point of view.http://ri.urd.ac.ir/article_14031_164c57b3b621da5fb76fb93a530fbf59.pdfreligious knowledgeheartreasonmoralityfeyz kashanijonathan edwards |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Saham Asadinia Qorban Elmi |
spellingShingle |
Saham Asadinia Qorban Elmi Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious Knowledge Religious Inquiries religious knowledge heart reason morality feyz kashani jonathan edwards |
author_facet |
Saham Asadinia Qorban Elmi |
author_sort |
Saham Asadinia |
title |
Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious Knowledge |
title_short |
Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious Knowledge |
title_full |
Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious Knowledge |
title_fullStr |
Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious Knowledge |
title_full_unstemmed |
Feyz Kashani and Jonathan Edwards on the Place of Heart in Religious Knowledge |
title_sort |
feyz kashani and jonathan edwards on the place of heart in religious knowledge |
publisher |
University of Religions and Denominations |
series |
Religious Inquiries |
issn |
2322-4894 2538-6271 |
publishDate |
2014-08-01 |
description |
This essay seeks to summarize and compare the theological ideas of Jonathan Edwards, a western philosopher, with those of Feyz Kashani, an eastern philosopher. The reason for this study is the numerous conjunctions that are seen in their ideas. These include the harmony of heart and reason in respect to belief, the priority of the heart in the reflection of truth, the belief in centrality of the religion of heart, the necessity of divine grace in the flow of religious knowledge, the emphasis on the esoteric side of religion as opposed to the exoteric side, and the importance of a practical approach to religion. Significant differences also exist between their ideas. For instance, Edwards believes that human nature is sinful and corrupted while Feyz does not believe this is true. Furthermore, Feyz interprets the path of heart to be based on reason, while Edwards has a different point of view. |
topic |
religious knowledge heart reason morality feyz kashani jonathan edwards |
url |
http://ri.urd.ac.ir/article_14031_164c57b3b621da5fb76fb93a530fbf59.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sahamasadinia feyzkashaniandjonathanedwardsontheplaceofheartinreligiousknowledge AT qorbanelmi feyzkashaniandjonathanedwardsontheplaceofheartinreligiousknowledge |
_version_ |
1725160000101285888 |