Neighborhood Characteristics and Colorectal Cancer Survivors' Quality of Care

Purpose: Quality cancer care entails receipt of a Survivorship Care Plan (SCP). The purpose of this study was to determine differences in SCP delivery by patient-level and neighborhood characteristics. Methods: We obtained California cancer registry data on individuals who were diagnosed with stage...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mary Ann Liebert 2019-12-01
Series:Health Equity
Online Access:https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/HEQ.2019.0062
id doaj-08e76658fe0c429bab0b226f3194ebfc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-08e76658fe0c429bab0b226f3194ebfc2020-11-25T02:51:18ZengMary Ann LiebertHealth Equity 2473-12422019-12-0110.1089/HEQ.2019.0062Neighborhood Characteristics and Colorectal Cancer Survivors' Quality of CarePurpose: Quality cancer care entails receipt of a Survivorship Care Plan (SCP). The purpose of this study was to determine differences in SCP delivery by patient-level and neighborhood characteristics. Methods: We obtained California cancer registry data on individuals who were diagnosed with stage I, II, or III colorectal cancer (CRC) between 2012 and 2015 and resided in predetermined geographic areas. We then mailed them a questionnaire, which queried about receipt of a SCP and its content. SCP was defined by content, as summary of cancer treatment, cancer surveillance recommendations, and/or an individualized preventive care. Using logistic regression modeling, each measure of SCP, as well as the summary measure (none vs. any), was evaluated by person-level characteristics. Subsequently, neighborhood-level characteristics were added to the model to explore their additional value. Results: Overall 80% of CRC survivors received a SCP. Receipt of SCPs was associated with person-level characteristics, while neighborhood characteristics did not make an additional contribution. Young, male employed survivors and those with more recent diagnoses or later cancer stages had greater odds of receiving a SCP. Conclusion: When providing SCPs, health care providers prioritize patient groups who they may perceive as vulnerable or likely to benefit from SCPs.https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/HEQ.2019.0062
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
title Neighborhood Characteristics and Colorectal Cancer Survivors' Quality of Care
spellingShingle Neighborhood Characteristics and Colorectal Cancer Survivors' Quality of Care
Health Equity
title_short Neighborhood Characteristics and Colorectal Cancer Survivors' Quality of Care
title_full Neighborhood Characteristics and Colorectal Cancer Survivors' Quality of Care
title_fullStr Neighborhood Characteristics and Colorectal Cancer Survivors' Quality of Care
title_full_unstemmed Neighborhood Characteristics and Colorectal Cancer Survivors' Quality of Care
title_sort neighborhood characteristics and colorectal cancer survivors' quality of care
publisher Mary Ann Liebert
series Health Equity
issn 2473-1242
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Purpose: Quality cancer care entails receipt of a Survivorship Care Plan (SCP). The purpose of this study was to determine differences in SCP delivery by patient-level and neighborhood characteristics. Methods: We obtained California cancer registry data on individuals who were diagnosed with stage I, II, or III colorectal cancer (CRC) between 2012 and 2015 and resided in predetermined geographic areas. We then mailed them a questionnaire, which queried about receipt of a SCP and its content. SCP was defined by content, as summary of cancer treatment, cancer surveillance recommendations, and/or an individualized preventive care. Using logistic regression modeling, each measure of SCP, as well as the summary measure (none vs. any), was evaluated by person-level characteristics. Subsequently, neighborhood-level characteristics were added to the model to explore their additional value. Results: Overall 80% of CRC survivors received a SCP. Receipt of SCPs was associated with person-level characteristics, while neighborhood characteristics did not make an additional contribution. Young, male employed survivors and those with more recent diagnoses or later cancer stages had greater odds of receiving a SCP. Conclusion: When providing SCPs, health care providers prioritize patient groups who they may perceive as vulnerable or likely to benefit from SCPs.
url https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/HEQ.2019.0062
_version_ 1724735320710184960