ORCID @ CMU: Successes and Failures

Setting and Objectives: Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) recently planned and implemented a project to help CMU researchers get an Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier (ORCID) and to enable administrators to integrate the ORCIDs into university systems. This article describes and assesses the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Denise Troll Covey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Massachusetts Medical School, Lamar Soutter Library 2016-02-01
Series:Journal of eScience Librarianship
Subjects:
Online Access:http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib/vol4/iss2/6/
id doaj-08e440d3c9f04b80aa6a8ecf298518b8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-08e440d3c9f04b80aa6a8ecf298518b82020-11-24T21:27:57ZengUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Lamar Soutter LibraryJournal of eScience Librarianship2161-39742016-02-0142e108310.7191/jeslib.2015.1083ORCID @ CMU: Successes and FailuresDenise Troll Covey0Carnegie Mellon UniversitySetting and Objectives: Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) recently planned and implemented a project to help CMU researchers get an Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier (ORCID) and to enable administrators to integrate the ORCIDs into university systems. This article describes and assesses the planning, performance, and outcome of this initiative, branded ORCID @ CMU. Design and Methods: The article chronicles why and how ORCID was integrated at CMU, including the rationale for changes in strategic plans. It assesses researcher participation in the project using transaction log and content analyses, and the performance of the ORCID project team using recommendations in the Jisc ORCID project report, frankly reporting the team’s successes and failures. The article concludes with lessons learned that should inform ORCID integration projects and expectations at other institutions. Results: The ORCID @ CMU web application was a great success. However, the project team did not allow enough time to prepare or devote enough attention to advocacy. The marketing message was not sufficiently persuasive and the marketing channels were not particularly effective. The overall participation rate in ORCID @ CMU was far below the target of 40%, though participation in many demographics exceeded the goal. Conclusions: Strategic planning does not guarantee success. Secure more than lip service from senior administrators. Recruit champions from across the institution. Develop a message that resonates with researchers. Allow sufficient time to prepare. Empower the project manager. Start with the low hanging fruit. Develop special outreach to doctoral students and postdocs.http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib/vol4/iss2/6/ORCIDscholarly communicationmarketingassessmentcontent analysistransaction log analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Denise Troll Covey
spellingShingle Denise Troll Covey
ORCID @ CMU: Successes and Failures
Journal of eScience Librarianship
ORCID
scholarly communication
marketing
assessment
content analysis
transaction log analysis
author_facet Denise Troll Covey
author_sort Denise Troll Covey
title ORCID @ CMU: Successes and Failures
title_short ORCID @ CMU: Successes and Failures
title_full ORCID @ CMU: Successes and Failures
title_fullStr ORCID @ CMU: Successes and Failures
title_full_unstemmed ORCID @ CMU: Successes and Failures
title_sort orcid @ cmu: successes and failures
publisher University of Massachusetts Medical School, Lamar Soutter Library
series Journal of eScience Librarianship
issn 2161-3974
publishDate 2016-02-01
description Setting and Objectives: Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) recently planned and implemented a project to help CMU researchers get an Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier (ORCID) and to enable administrators to integrate the ORCIDs into university systems. This article describes and assesses the planning, performance, and outcome of this initiative, branded ORCID @ CMU. Design and Methods: The article chronicles why and how ORCID was integrated at CMU, including the rationale for changes in strategic plans. It assesses researcher participation in the project using transaction log and content analyses, and the performance of the ORCID project team using recommendations in the Jisc ORCID project report, frankly reporting the team’s successes and failures. The article concludes with lessons learned that should inform ORCID integration projects and expectations at other institutions. Results: The ORCID @ CMU web application was a great success. However, the project team did not allow enough time to prepare or devote enough attention to advocacy. The marketing message was not sufficiently persuasive and the marketing channels were not particularly effective. The overall participation rate in ORCID @ CMU was far below the target of 40%, though participation in many demographics exceeded the goal. Conclusions: Strategic planning does not guarantee success. Secure more than lip service from senior administrators. Recruit champions from across the institution. Develop a message that resonates with researchers. Allow sufficient time to prepare. Empower the project manager. Start with the low hanging fruit. Develop special outreach to doctoral students and postdocs.
topic ORCID
scholarly communication
marketing
assessment
content analysis
transaction log analysis
url http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib/vol4/iss2/6/
work_keys_str_mv AT denisetrollcovey orcidcmusuccessesandfailures
_version_ 1725972411143159808