Brain oscillations and frequency-dependent modulation of cortical excitability

Background: Noninvasive brain stimulation is a powerful way to modify excitability of the cerebral cortex in humans and is increasingly used to treat psychiatric disorders. The observed clinical effects are in the moderate range and it has been suggested that the efficiency of brain stimulation depe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dennis J.L.G. Schutter, Ruud Hortensius
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2011-04-01
Series:Brain Stimulation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X10001099
id doaj-08daebc4e16f45f7afd093eca77f97ff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-08daebc4e16f45f7afd093eca77f97ff2021-03-18T04:34:56ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2011-04-014297103Brain oscillations and frequency-dependent modulation of cortical excitabilityDennis J.L.G. Schutter0Ruud Hortensius1Correspondence: Dr. Dennis J. L. G. Schutter, Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht 3584CS, The Netherlands.; Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The NetherlandsExperimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The NetherlandsBackground: Noninvasive brain stimulation is a powerful way to modify excitability of the cerebral cortex in humans and is increasingly used to treat psychiatric disorders. The observed clinical effects are in the moderate range and it has been suggested that the efficiency of brain stimulation depends on the underlying cortical state. Objective: To isolate and manipulate brain rhythms associated with cortical excitability. Methods: In the first experiment electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were interleaved to study associations between brain oscillations and the amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP) during isometric contraction. Results of the first experiment were used in a second experiment to selectively modulate cortical excitability levels by applying transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Results: A linear regression showed that MEP amplitude could be modeled by θ (4-7 Hz) and β (13-30 Hz) oscillations recorded over the left and right M1. Significant increases in cortical excitability were found after θ (5 Hz)-β (20 Hz) tACS as compared with baseline and α (10 Hz) tACS. Conclusions: Scalp-recorded brain oscillations can serve as a proxy for the effective modulation of cortical excitability by mimicking natural brain rhythms using weak electric currents.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X10001099brain oscillationscortical excitabilityelectroencephalogrammotor cortexmotor evoked potentialtranscranial alternating current stimulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dennis J.L.G. Schutter
Ruud Hortensius
spellingShingle Dennis J.L.G. Schutter
Ruud Hortensius
Brain oscillations and frequency-dependent modulation of cortical excitability
Brain Stimulation
brain oscillations
cortical excitability
electroencephalogram
motor cortex
motor evoked potential
transcranial alternating current stimulation
author_facet Dennis J.L.G. Schutter
Ruud Hortensius
author_sort Dennis J.L.G. Schutter
title Brain oscillations and frequency-dependent modulation of cortical excitability
title_short Brain oscillations and frequency-dependent modulation of cortical excitability
title_full Brain oscillations and frequency-dependent modulation of cortical excitability
title_fullStr Brain oscillations and frequency-dependent modulation of cortical excitability
title_full_unstemmed Brain oscillations and frequency-dependent modulation of cortical excitability
title_sort brain oscillations and frequency-dependent modulation of cortical excitability
publisher Elsevier
series Brain Stimulation
issn 1935-861X
publishDate 2011-04-01
description Background: Noninvasive brain stimulation is a powerful way to modify excitability of the cerebral cortex in humans and is increasingly used to treat psychiatric disorders. The observed clinical effects are in the moderate range and it has been suggested that the efficiency of brain stimulation depends on the underlying cortical state. Objective: To isolate and manipulate brain rhythms associated with cortical excitability. Methods: In the first experiment electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were interleaved to study associations between brain oscillations and the amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP) during isometric contraction. Results of the first experiment were used in a second experiment to selectively modulate cortical excitability levels by applying transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Results: A linear regression showed that MEP amplitude could be modeled by θ (4-7 Hz) and β (13-30 Hz) oscillations recorded over the left and right M1. Significant increases in cortical excitability were found after θ (5 Hz)-β (20 Hz) tACS as compared with baseline and α (10 Hz) tACS. Conclusions: Scalp-recorded brain oscillations can serve as a proxy for the effective modulation of cortical excitability by mimicking natural brain rhythms using weak electric currents.
topic brain oscillations
cortical excitability
electroencephalogram
motor cortex
motor evoked potential
transcranial alternating current stimulation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X10001099
work_keys_str_mv AT dennisjlgschutter brainoscillationsandfrequencydependentmodulationofcorticalexcitability
AT ruudhortensius brainoscillationsandfrequencydependentmodulationofcorticalexcitability
_version_ 1724217463260839936