A checklist for choosing between R packages in ecology and evolution

• Main Authors: Christopher J. Lortie, Jenna Braun, Alessandro Filazzola, Florencia Miguel
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2020-02-01
• Series: Ecology and Evolution
• Subjects: checklist; guidelines; heuristic; open source; paradox of choice; R programming language
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5970

Abstract The open source and free programming language R is a phenomenal mechanism to address a multiplicity of challenges in ecology and evolution. It is also a complex ecosystem because of the diversity of solutions available to the analyst. Packages for R enhance and specialize the capacity to explore both niche data/experiments and more common needs. However, the paradox of choice or how we select between many seemingly similar options can be overwhelming and lead to different potential outcomes. There is extensive choice in ecology and evolution between packages for both fundamental statistics and for more specialized domain‐level analyses. Here, we provide a checklist to inform these decisions based on the principles of resilience, need, and integration with scientific workflows for evidence. It is important to explore choices in any analytical coding environment—not just R—for solutions to challenges in ecology and evolution, and document this process because it advances reproducible science, promotes a deeper understand of the scientific evidence, and ensures that the outcomes are correct, representative, and robust.