Variations in cardiovascular disease under-diagnosis in England: national cross-sectional spatial analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There is under-diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the English population, despite financial incentives to encourage general practices to register new cases. We compared the modelled (expected) and diagnosed (observed) preva...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Walford Hannah, Indulkar Tejal, Samarasundera Edgar, Soljak Michael, Majeed Azeem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-03-01
Series:BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/11/12
id doaj-08c6dddfd82f4f59b910c753f56b66ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-08c6dddfd82f4f59b910c753f56b66ce2020-11-25T01:42:59ZengBMCBMC Cardiovascular Disorders1471-22612011-03-011111210.1186/1471-2261-11-12Variations in cardiovascular disease under-diagnosis in England: national cross-sectional spatial analysisWalford HannahIndulkar TejalSamarasundera EdgarSoljak MichaelMajeed Azeem<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There is under-diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the English population, despite financial incentives to encourage general practices to register new cases. We compared the modelled (expected) and diagnosed (observed) prevalence of three cardiovascular conditions- coronary heart disease (CHD), hypertension and stroke- at local level, their geographical variation, and population and healthcare predictors which might influence diagnosis.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Cross-sectional observational study in all English local authorities (351) and general practices (8,372) comparing model-based expected prevalence with diagnosed prevalence on practice disease registers. Spatial analyses were used to identify geographic clusters and variation in regression relationships.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 9,682,176 patients were on practice CHD, stroke and transient ischaemic attack, and hypertension registers. There was wide spatial variation in observed: expected prevalence ratios for all three diseases, with less than five per cent of expected cases diagnosed in some areas. London and the surrounding area showed statistically significant discrepancies in observed: expected prevalence ratios, with observed prevalence much lower than the epidemiological models predicted. The addition of general practitioner supply as a variable yielded stronger regression results for all three conditions.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Despite almost universal access to free primary healthcare, there may be significant and highly variable under-diagnosis of CVD across England, which can be partially explained by persistent inequity in GP supply. Disease management studies should consider the possible impact of under-diagnosis on population health outcomes. Compared to classical regression modelling, spatial analytic techniques can provide additional information on risk factors for under-diagnosis, and can suggest where healthcare resources may be most needed.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/11/12
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Walford Hannah
Indulkar Tejal
Samarasundera Edgar
Soljak Michael
Majeed Azeem
spellingShingle Walford Hannah
Indulkar Tejal
Samarasundera Edgar
Soljak Michael
Majeed Azeem
Variations in cardiovascular disease under-diagnosis in England: national cross-sectional spatial analysis
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
author_facet Walford Hannah
Indulkar Tejal
Samarasundera Edgar
Soljak Michael
Majeed Azeem
author_sort Walford Hannah
title Variations in cardiovascular disease under-diagnosis in England: national cross-sectional spatial analysis
title_short Variations in cardiovascular disease under-diagnosis in England: national cross-sectional spatial analysis
title_full Variations in cardiovascular disease under-diagnosis in England: national cross-sectional spatial analysis
title_fullStr Variations in cardiovascular disease under-diagnosis in England: national cross-sectional spatial analysis
title_full_unstemmed Variations in cardiovascular disease under-diagnosis in England: national cross-sectional spatial analysis
title_sort variations in cardiovascular disease under-diagnosis in england: national cross-sectional spatial analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
issn 1471-2261
publishDate 2011-03-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There is under-diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the English population, despite financial incentives to encourage general practices to register new cases. We compared the modelled (expected) and diagnosed (observed) prevalence of three cardiovascular conditions- coronary heart disease (CHD), hypertension and stroke- at local level, their geographical variation, and population and healthcare predictors which might influence diagnosis.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Cross-sectional observational study in all English local authorities (351) and general practices (8,372) comparing model-based expected prevalence with diagnosed prevalence on practice disease registers. Spatial analyses were used to identify geographic clusters and variation in regression relationships.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 9,682,176 patients were on practice CHD, stroke and transient ischaemic attack, and hypertension registers. There was wide spatial variation in observed: expected prevalence ratios for all three diseases, with less than five per cent of expected cases diagnosed in some areas. London and the surrounding area showed statistically significant discrepancies in observed: expected prevalence ratios, with observed prevalence much lower than the epidemiological models predicted. The addition of general practitioner supply as a variable yielded stronger regression results for all three conditions.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Despite almost universal access to free primary healthcare, there may be significant and highly variable under-diagnosis of CVD across England, which can be partially explained by persistent inequity in GP supply. Disease management studies should consider the possible impact of under-diagnosis on population health outcomes. Compared to classical regression modelling, spatial analytic techniques can provide additional information on risk factors for under-diagnosis, and can suggest where healthcare resources may be most needed.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/11/12
work_keys_str_mv AT walfordhannah variationsincardiovasculardiseaseunderdiagnosisinenglandnationalcrosssectionalspatialanalysis
AT indulkartejal variationsincardiovasculardiseaseunderdiagnosisinenglandnationalcrosssectionalspatialanalysis
AT samarasunderaedgar variationsincardiovasculardiseaseunderdiagnosisinenglandnationalcrosssectionalspatialanalysis
AT soljakmichael variationsincardiovasculardiseaseunderdiagnosisinenglandnationalcrosssectionalspatialanalysis
AT majeedazeem variationsincardiovasculardiseaseunderdiagnosisinenglandnationalcrosssectionalspatialanalysis
_version_ 1725033852664020992