Debate: Towards a Cohesive and Contextualised Response: When is it necessary to distinguish between forced labour, trafficking in persons and slavery?

In my view, the answer to the debate question of whether it is necessary to distinguish between forced labour, trafficking and slavery depends on the context. Therefore the focus should instead be on identifying when it is necessary to distinguish and when it is not required. Furthermore, an essenti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marja Paavilainen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women 2015-09-01
Series:Anti-Trafficking Review
Online Access:http://www.antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/141
id doaj-08b1da07a9374c3bad6a44461097835c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-08b1da07a9374c3bad6a44461097835c2020-11-24T22:08:32ZengGlobal Alliance Against Traffic in WomenAnti-Trafficking Review2286-75112287-01132015-09-01510.14197/atr.201215512141Debate: Towards a Cohesive and Contextualised Response: When is it necessary to distinguish between forced labour, trafficking in persons and slavery?Marja PaavilainenIn my view, the answer to the debate question of whether it is necessary to distinguish between forced labour, trafficking and slavery depends on the context. Therefore the focus should instead be on identifying when it is necessary to distinguish and when it is not required. Furthermore, an essential follow-up is the question of how we can prevent and address these different forms of coercion in a coherent manner.http://www.antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/141
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marja Paavilainen
spellingShingle Marja Paavilainen
Debate: Towards a Cohesive and Contextualised Response: When is it necessary to distinguish between forced labour, trafficking in persons and slavery?
Anti-Trafficking Review
author_facet Marja Paavilainen
author_sort Marja Paavilainen
title Debate: Towards a Cohesive and Contextualised Response: When is it necessary to distinguish between forced labour, trafficking in persons and slavery?
title_short Debate: Towards a Cohesive and Contextualised Response: When is it necessary to distinguish between forced labour, trafficking in persons and slavery?
title_full Debate: Towards a Cohesive and Contextualised Response: When is it necessary to distinguish between forced labour, trafficking in persons and slavery?
title_fullStr Debate: Towards a Cohesive and Contextualised Response: When is it necessary to distinguish between forced labour, trafficking in persons and slavery?
title_full_unstemmed Debate: Towards a Cohesive and Contextualised Response: When is it necessary to distinguish between forced labour, trafficking in persons and slavery?
title_sort debate: towards a cohesive and contextualised response: when is it necessary to distinguish between forced labour, trafficking in persons and slavery?
publisher Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women
series Anti-Trafficking Review
issn 2286-7511
2287-0113
publishDate 2015-09-01
description In my view, the answer to the debate question of whether it is necessary to distinguish between forced labour, trafficking and slavery depends on the context. Therefore the focus should instead be on identifying when it is necessary to distinguish and when it is not required. Furthermore, an essential follow-up is the question of how we can prevent and address these different forms of coercion in a coherent manner.
url http://www.antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/141
work_keys_str_mv AT marjapaavilainen debatetowardsacohesiveandcontextualisedresponsewhenisitnecessarytodistinguishbetweenforcedlabourtraffickinginpersonsandslavery
_version_ 1725816131985342464