Single neurons in M1 and premotor cortex directly reflect behavioral interference.

Some motor tasks, if learned together, interfere with each other's consolidation and subsequent retention, whereas other tasks do not. Interfering tasks are said to employ the same internal model whereas noninterfering tasks use different models. The division of function among internal models,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neta Zach, Dorrit Inbar, Yael Grinvald, Eilon Vaadia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3299706?pdf=render
id doaj-08a7827bdd1046169289d3da1f44a759
record_format Article
spelling doaj-08a7827bdd1046169289d3da1f44a7592020-11-25T01:51:46ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0173e3298610.1371/journal.pone.0032986Single neurons in M1 and premotor cortex directly reflect behavioral interference.Neta ZachDorrit InbarYael GrinvaldEilon VaadiaSome motor tasks, if learned together, interfere with each other's consolidation and subsequent retention, whereas other tasks do not. Interfering tasks are said to employ the same internal model whereas noninterfering tasks use different models. The division of function among internal models, as well as their possible neural substrates, are not well understood. To investigate these questions, we compared responses of single cells in the primary motor cortex and premotor cortex of primates to interfering and noninterfering tasks. The interfering tasks were visuomotor rotation followed by opposing visuomotor rotation. The noninterfering tasks were visuomotor rotation followed by an arbitrary association task. Learning two noninterfering tasks led to the simultaneous formation of neural activity typical of both tasks, at the level of single neurons. In contrast, and in accordance with behavioral results, after learning two interfering tasks, only the second task was successfully reflected in motor cortical single cell activity. These results support the hypothesis that the representational capacity of motor cortical cells is the basis of behavioral interference and division between internal models.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3299706?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Neta Zach
Dorrit Inbar
Yael Grinvald
Eilon Vaadia
spellingShingle Neta Zach
Dorrit Inbar
Yael Grinvald
Eilon Vaadia
Single neurons in M1 and premotor cortex directly reflect behavioral interference.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Neta Zach
Dorrit Inbar
Yael Grinvald
Eilon Vaadia
author_sort Neta Zach
title Single neurons in M1 and premotor cortex directly reflect behavioral interference.
title_short Single neurons in M1 and premotor cortex directly reflect behavioral interference.
title_full Single neurons in M1 and premotor cortex directly reflect behavioral interference.
title_fullStr Single neurons in M1 and premotor cortex directly reflect behavioral interference.
title_full_unstemmed Single neurons in M1 and premotor cortex directly reflect behavioral interference.
title_sort single neurons in m1 and premotor cortex directly reflect behavioral interference.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Some motor tasks, if learned together, interfere with each other's consolidation and subsequent retention, whereas other tasks do not. Interfering tasks are said to employ the same internal model whereas noninterfering tasks use different models. The division of function among internal models, as well as their possible neural substrates, are not well understood. To investigate these questions, we compared responses of single cells in the primary motor cortex and premotor cortex of primates to interfering and noninterfering tasks. The interfering tasks were visuomotor rotation followed by opposing visuomotor rotation. The noninterfering tasks were visuomotor rotation followed by an arbitrary association task. Learning two noninterfering tasks led to the simultaneous formation of neural activity typical of both tasks, at the level of single neurons. In contrast, and in accordance with behavioral results, after learning two interfering tasks, only the second task was successfully reflected in motor cortical single cell activity. These results support the hypothesis that the representational capacity of motor cortical cells is the basis of behavioral interference and division between internal models.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3299706?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT netazach singleneuronsinm1andpremotorcortexdirectlyreflectbehavioralinterference
AT dorritinbar singleneuronsinm1andpremotorcortexdirectlyreflectbehavioralinterference
AT yaelgrinvald singleneuronsinm1andpremotorcortexdirectlyreflectbehavioralinterference
AT eilonvaadia singleneuronsinm1andpremotorcortexdirectlyreflectbehavioralinterference
_version_ 1724996448038158336