The theory of lie: from the sophists to socrates

The last third of the 20th century and the first decade of the 21st century show the growth of scientific and especially, scientific-promotional papers on the problems of the particularities and forms of existence of deception and lie in European culture and social life. The concepts have emerged, p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nesmeyanov Evgeny, Petrova Yulia, Abueva Nazhavat, Ismailova Aliya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/13/shsconf_appsconf2019_01003.pdf
id doaj-089bbf1e988e4eb78f2a3e9b4a607a6b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-089bbf1e988e4eb78f2a3e9b4a607a6b2021-02-02T05:13:27ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242019-01-01720100310.1051/shsconf/20197201003shsconf_appsconf2019_01003The theory of lie: from the sophists to socratesNesmeyanov Evgeny0Petrova Yulia1Abueva Nazhavat2Ismailova Aliya3Don State Technical UniversityRostov State University of EconomicsDagestan State Technical UniversityDagestan State Technical UniversityThe last third of the 20th century and the first decade of the 21st century show the growth of scientific and especially, scientific-promotional papers on the problems of the particularities and forms of existence of deception and lie in European culture and social life. The concepts have emerged, proving the necessity and value of certain forms of lies for the preservation of the state, the family, and the implementation of the real practice of human communication: the existence of such activities as diplomacy, business, art and others. In some psychological and pedagogical papers define the idea of the importance of lie and deception for the development of the child’s intellectual abilities, and the success of the adult in the society. With almost unlimited amount of such literature of different theoretical levels, synthesizing the «philosophical and cultural studies of lies and deception» are much less. The papers devoted to the emergence of the first attempts of the theoretical explanation of the established practice of lying and deceiving with the help of rationally constructed theoretical constructions are not enough. This article is an attempt to fill this gap partially.https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/13/shsconf_appsconf2019_01003.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nesmeyanov Evgeny
Petrova Yulia
Abueva Nazhavat
Ismailova Aliya
spellingShingle Nesmeyanov Evgeny
Petrova Yulia
Abueva Nazhavat
Ismailova Aliya
The theory of lie: from the sophists to socrates
SHS Web of Conferences
author_facet Nesmeyanov Evgeny
Petrova Yulia
Abueva Nazhavat
Ismailova Aliya
author_sort Nesmeyanov Evgeny
title The theory of lie: from the sophists to socrates
title_short The theory of lie: from the sophists to socrates
title_full The theory of lie: from the sophists to socrates
title_fullStr The theory of lie: from the sophists to socrates
title_full_unstemmed The theory of lie: from the sophists to socrates
title_sort theory of lie: from the sophists to socrates
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The last third of the 20th century and the first decade of the 21st century show the growth of scientific and especially, scientific-promotional papers on the problems of the particularities and forms of existence of deception and lie in European culture and social life. The concepts have emerged, proving the necessity and value of certain forms of lies for the preservation of the state, the family, and the implementation of the real practice of human communication: the existence of such activities as diplomacy, business, art and others. In some psychological and pedagogical papers define the idea of the importance of lie and deception for the development of the child’s intellectual abilities, and the success of the adult in the society. With almost unlimited amount of such literature of different theoretical levels, synthesizing the «philosophical and cultural studies of lies and deception» are much less. The papers devoted to the emergence of the first attempts of the theoretical explanation of the established practice of lying and deceiving with the help of rationally constructed theoretical constructions are not enough. This article is an attempt to fill this gap partially.
url https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/13/shsconf_appsconf2019_01003.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nesmeyanovevgeny thetheoryofliefromthesophiststosocrates
AT petrovayulia thetheoryofliefromthesophiststosocrates
AT abuevanazhavat thetheoryofliefromthesophiststosocrates
AT ismailovaaliya thetheoryofliefromthesophiststosocrates
AT nesmeyanovevgeny theoryofliefromthesophiststosocrates
AT petrovayulia theoryofliefromthesophiststosocrates
AT abuevanazhavat theoryofliefromthesophiststosocrates
AT ismailovaaliya theoryofliefromthesophiststosocrates
_version_ 1724304029654188032