Evaluation of factors causing delayed graft function in live related donor renal transplantation

To determine the incidence and determinants of delayed graft function due to post-transplant acute tubular necrosis in live related donor renal transplantation. This is a retrospective study of 337 recipients of live related donor renal graft performed between1986 and 2006. Of these recipients, <...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sharma A, Tolani S, Rathi G, Sharma P, Gupta H, Gupta R
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2010-01-01
Series:Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
Online Access:http://www.sjkdt.org/article.asp?issn=1319-2442;year=2010;volume=21;issue=2;spage=242;epage=245;aulast=Sharma
id doaj-08649317b2724f34a8c44d7e9d398eac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-08649317b2724f34a8c44d7e9d398eac2020-11-24T23:24:33ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSaudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation1319-24422010-01-01212242245Evaluation of factors causing delayed graft function in live related donor renal transplantationSharma ATolani SRathi GSharma PGupta HGupta RTo determine the incidence and determinants of delayed graft function due to post-transplant acute tubular necrosis in live related donor renal transplantation. This is a retrospective study of 337 recipients of live related donor renal graft performed between1986 and 2006. Of these recipients, <i>24 (7.1&#x0025;) </i>subjects developed delayed graft function with no evidence of acute rejection, cyclosporin toxicity, vascular catastrophe or obstructive cause and had evidence of acute tubular necrosis (ATN Group). These subjects were compared with recipients (n= 313, 92.9&#x0025;) who had no clinical or biochemical evidence of ATN. Mean age, and gender distribution of recipients was similar in the two groups (ATN group 35.7 &#177; 8.3, non-ATN group 34.3 &#177; 7.5, P= 0.43). Gender distribution of the recipients (men 279, 89.1&#x0025; vs. 21, 87.5&#x0025;, P= 0.80) as well as donors (women 221, 70.6&#x0025; vs. 18, 75.0&#x0025;, P= 0.75) was also similar. In ATN group as compared with non-ATN group the donor age was significantly greater (56.6 &#177; 8.3 vs. 46.6 &#177; 11.2 years, P&lt; 0.0001). There was marginal difference in pre-operative systolic BP (154.5 &#177; 18.3 vs. 147.4 &#177; 20.2 mm Hg, P= 0.077) and significant difference in diastolic BP (87.8 &#177; 9.5 vs. 83.4 &#177; 11.4 mmHg, P= 0.041). Incidence of multiple renal arteries was similar (16.7&#x0025; vs. 7.3&#x0025;, P= 0.22). The warm ischemia time was significantly greater in ATN group (33.3 &#177; 6.2 min) as compared to non-ATN group (30.4 &#177; 5.7 min, P= 0.042). Duration of hospital stay was more in ATN group (19.9 &#177; 6.7 vs. 16.8 &#177; 8.4 days, P= 0.04) but there was no difference in 1 year survival (284 subjects, 90.7&#x0025; vs. 21 subjects, 87.5&#x0025;, P= 0.873). This study shows that greater donor age, higher baseline diastolic BP and greater warm ischemia time are major determinants of delayed graft function due to acute tubular necrosis after related donor renal transplantation.http://www.sjkdt.org/article.asp?issn=1319-2442;year=2010;volume=21;issue=2;spage=242;epage=245;aulast=Sharma
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sharma A
Tolani S
Rathi G
Sharma P
Gupta H
Gupta R
spellingShingle Sharma A
Tolani S
Rathi G
Sharma P
Gupta H
Gupta R
Evaluation of factors causing delayed graft function in live related donor renal transplantation
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
author_facet Sharma A
Tolani S
Rathi G
Sharma P
Gupta H
Gupta R
author_sort Sharma A
title Evaluation of factors causing delayed graft function in live related donor renal transplantation
title_short Evaluation of factors causing delayed graft function in live related donor renal transplantation
title_full Evaluation of factors causing delayed graft function in live related donor renal transplantation
title_fullStr Evaluation of factors causing delayed graft function in live related donor renal transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of factors causing delayed graft function in live related donor renal transplantation
title_sort evaluation of factors causing delayed graft function in live related donor renal transplantation
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
issn 1319-2442
publishDate 2010-01-01
description To determine the incidence and determinants of delayed graft function due to post-transplant acute tubular necrosis in live related donor renal transplantation. This is a retrospective study of 337 recipients of live related donor renal graft performed between1986 and 2006. Of these recipients, <i>24 (7.1&#x0025;) </i>subjects developed delayed graft function with no evidence of acute rejection, cyclosporin toxicity, vascular catastrophe or obstructive cause and had evidence of acute tubular necrosis (ATN Group). These subjects were compared with recipients (n= 313, 92.9&#x0025;) who had no clinical or biochemical evidence of ATN. Mean age, and gender distribution of recipients was similar in the two groups (ATN group 35.7 &#177; 8.3, non-ATN group 34.3 &#177; 7.5, P= 0.43). Gender distribution of the recipients (men 279, 89.1&#x0025; vs. 21, 87.5&#x0025;, P= 0.80) as well as donors (women 221, 70.6&#x0025; vs. 18, 75.0&#x0025;, P= 0.75) was also similar. In ATN group as compared with non-ATN group the donor age was significantly greater (56.6 &#177; 8.3 vs. 46.6 &#177; 11.2 years, P&lt; 0.0001). There was marginal difference in pre-operative systolic BP (154.5 &#177; 18.3 vs. 147.4 &#177; 20.2 mm Hg, P= 0.077) and significant difference in diastolic BP (87.8 &#177; 9.5 vs. 83.4 &#177; 11.4 mmHg, P= 0.041). Incidence of multiple renal arteries was similar (16.7&#x0025; vs. 7.3&#x0025;, P= 0.22). The warm ischemia time was significantly greater in ATN group (33.3 &#177; 6.2 min) as compared to non-ATN group (30.4 &#177; 5.7 min, P= 0.042). Duration of hospital stay was more in ATN group (19.9 &#177; 6.7 vs. 16.8 &#177; 8.4 days, P= 0.04) but there was no difference in 1 year survival (284 subjects, 90.7&#x0025; vs. 21 subjects, 87.5&#x0025;, P= 0.873). This study shows that greater donor age, higher baseline diastolic BP and greater warm ischemia time are major determinants of delayed graft function due to acute tubular necrosis after related donor renal transplantation.
url http://www.sjkdt.org/article.asp?issn=1319-2442;year=2010;volume=21;issue=2;spage=242;epage=245;aulast=Sharma
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaa evaluationoffactorscausingdelayedgraftfunctioninliverelateddonorrenaltransplantation
AT tolanis evaluationoffactorscausingdelayedgraftfunctioninliverelateddonorrenaltransplantation
AT rathig evaluationoffactorscausingdelayedgraftfunctioninliverelateddonorrenaltransplantation
AT sharmap evaluationoffactorscausingdelayedgraftfunctioninliverelateddonorrenaltransplantation
AT guptah evaluationoffactorscausingdelayedgraftfunctioninliverelateddonorrenaltransplantation
AT guptar evaluationoffactorscausingdelayedgraftfunctioninliverelateddonorrenaltransplantation
_version_ 1725560103567884288