Information technology in university-level mathematics teaching and learning: a mathematician's point of view

Although mathematicians frequently use specialist software in direct teaching ofmathematics, as a means of delivery e-learning technologies have so far been lesswidely used. We (mathematicians) insist that teaching methods should be subjectspecificand content-driven, not delivery-driven. We oppose g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexandre Borovik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Learning Technology 2011-12-01
Series:Research in Learning Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/17106
id doaj-08536548b52e432cbb72c0633650ffac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-08536548b52e432cbb72c0633650ffac2020-11-25T00:11:24ZengAssociation for Learning Technology Research in Learning Technology2156-70692156-70772011-12-0119110.3402/rlt.v19i1.17106Information technology in university-level mathematics teaching and learning: a mathematician's point of viewAlexandre BorovikAlthough mathematicians frequently use specialist software in direct teaching ofmathematics, as a means of delivery e-learning technologies have so far been lesswidely used. We (mathematicians) insist that teaching methods should be subjectspecificand content-driven, not delivery-driven. We oppose generic approaches toteaching, including excessively generalist, content-free, one-size-fits-allpromotion of information and communications technology. This stance is fullyexpressed, for example, in the recent Teaching Position Statement from the LondonMathematical Society (2010) and is supported by a recent report from the NationalUnion of Students (2010, 5): “Not every area of study needed or was compatiblewith e-learning, and so to assume it would grant blanket advantages was notaccurate”. This paper is an attempt to explain mathematicians' selectivity in use ofinformation and communications technology and its guiding principles. The paperis addressed to our non-mathematician colleagues and is not intended to be a surveyof the existing software and courseware for mathematics teaching – the corpus ofexisting solutions is enormous and its discussion inevitably involves hardcoremathematics.http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/17106mathematicsuniversityinformation technology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexandre Borovik
spellingShingle Alexandre Borovik
Information technology in university-level mathematics teaching and learning: a mathematician's point of view
Research in Learning Technology
mathematics
university
information technology
author_facet Alexandre Borovik
author_sort Alexandre Borovik
title Information technology in university-level mathematics teaching and learning: a mathematician's point of view
title_short Information technology in university-level mathematics teaching and learning: a mathematician's point of view
title_full Information technology in university-level mathematics teaching and learning: a mathematician's point of view
title_fullStr Information technology in university-level mathematics teaching and learning: a mathematician's point of view
title_full_unstemmed Information technology in university-level mathematics teaching and learning: a mathematician's point of view
title_sort information technology in university-level mathematics teaching and learning: a mathematician's point of view
publisher Association for Learning Technology
series Research in Learning Technology
issn 2156-7069
2156-7077
publishDate 2011-12-01
description Although mathematicians frequently use specialist software in direct teaching ofmathematics, as a means of delivery e-learning technologies have so far been lesswidely used. We (mathematicians) insist that teaching methods should be subjectspecificand content-driven, not delivery-driven. We oppose generic approaches toteaching, including excessively generalist, content-free, one-size-fits-allpromotion of information and communications technology. This stance is fullyexpressed, for example, in the recent Teaching Position Statement from the LondonMathematical Society (2010) and is supported by a recent report from the NationalUnion of Students (2010, 5): “Not every area of study needed or was compatiblewith e-learning, and so to assume it would grant blanket advantages was notaccurate”. This paper is an attempt to explain mathematicians' selectivity in use ofinformation and communications technology and its guiding principles. The paperis addressed to our non-mathematician colleagues and is not intended to be a surveyof the existing software and courseware for mathematics teaching – the corpus ofexisting solutions is enormous and its discussion inevitably involves hardcoremathematics.
topic mathematics
university
information technology
url http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/17106
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandreborovik informationtechnologyinuniversitylevelmathematicsteachingandlearningamathematicianx0027spointofview
_version_ 1725404221641064448