CRISPR as agent: a metaphor that rhetorically inhibits the prospects for responsible research
Abstract In 2015, a group of 18 scientists and bioethicists published an editorial in Science calling for “open discourse on the use of CRISPR-Cas9 technology to manipulate the human genome” and recommending that steps be taken to strongly discourage “any attempts at germline genome modification” in...
Main Author: | Leah Ceccarelli |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Life Sciences, Society and Policy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40504-018-0088-8 |
Similar Items
-
Prospects of genome editing using CRISPR/CAS or how to master genetic scissors. Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2020
by: S. V. Komisarenko, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
HISTORIA DE LAS REUNIONES DE ASILOMAR. ÉXITOS Y FRACASOS DE LA AUTORREGULACIÓN EN LAS COMUNIDADES TECNOCIENTÍFICAS
by: Jósean Larrión Cartujo
Published: (2011-01-01) -
The 2018-2019 Summitry Process and Prospects for Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula
by: Anton Khlopkov
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Weitere Diskussion erforderlich!
by: Andreas Oschlies
Published: (2010-08-01) -
Debating CRISPR/cas9 and Mitochondrial Donation: Continuity and Transition Performances at Scientific Conferences
by: Neil Stephens, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01)