E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment Environments

The importance of E. coli as an indicator organism in fresh water has led to numerous studies focusing on cell properties and transport behavior. However, previous studies have been unable to assess if differences in E. coli cell surface properties and genomic variation are associated with different...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao Liang, Chunyu Liao, Michael L Thompson, Michelle Lynn Soupir, Laura R Jarboe, Philip M Dixon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01732/full
id doaj-0833a16cf7434d26abfcb95eb8bec0a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0833a16cf7434d26abfcb95eb8bec0a42020-11-24T20:53:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2016-11-01710.3389/fmicb.2016.01732215923E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment EnvironmentsXiao Liang0Chunyu Liao1Michael L Thompson2Michelle Lynn Soupir3Laura R Jarboe4Philip M Dixon5Iowa State UniversityIowa State UniverstiyIowa State UniversityIowa State UniversityIowa State UniversityIowa State UniversityThe importance of E. coli as an indicator organism in fresh water has led to numerous studies focusing on cell properties and transport behavior. However, previous studies have been unable to assess if differences in E. coli cell surface properties and genomic variation are associated with different environmental habitats. In this study, we investigated the variation in characteristics of E. coli obtained from stream water and stream bottom sediments. Cell properties were measured for 77 genomically different E. coli strains (44 strains isolated from sediments and 33 strains isolated from water) under common stream conditions in the Upper Midwestern United States: pH 8.0, ionic strength 10mM and 22˚C. Measured cell properties include hydrophobicity, zeta potential, net charge, total acidity and extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) composition. Our results indicate that stream sediment E. coli had significantly greater hydrophobicity, greater EPS protein content and EPS sugar content, less negative net charge, and higher point of zero charge than stream water E. coli. A significant positive correlation was observed between hydrophobicity and EPS protein for stream sediment E. coli but not for stream water E. coli. Additionally, E. coli surviving in the same habitat tended to have significantly larger (GTG)5 genome similarity. After accounting for the intrinsic impact from the genome, environmental habitat was determined to be a factor influencing some cell surface properties, such as hydrophobicity. The diversity of cell properties and its resulting impact on particle interactions should be considered for environmental fate and transport modeling of aquatic indicator organisms such as E. coli.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01732/fullWater QualityStreamE. coliparticlesurface propertyphylo-type
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiao Liang
Chunyu Liao
Michael L Thompson
Michelle Lynn Soupir
Laura R Jarboe
Philip M Dixon
spellingShingle Xiao Liang
Chunyu Liao
Michael L Thompson
Michelle Lynn Soupir
Laura R Jarboe
Philip M Dixon
E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment Environments
Frontiers in Microbiology
Water Quality
Stream
E. coli
particle
surface property
phylo-type
author_facet Xiao Liang
Chunyu Liao
Michael L Thompson
Michelle Lynn Soupir
Laura R Jarboe
Philip M Dixon
author_sort Xiao Liang
title E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment Environments
title_short E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment Environments
title_full E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment Environments
title_fullStr E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment Environments
title_full_unstemmed E. coli Surface Properties Differ between Stream Water and Sediment Environments
title_sort e. coli surface properties differ between stream water and sediment environments
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Microbiology
issn 1664-302X
publishDate 2016-11-01
description The importance of E. coli as an indicator organism in fresh water has led to numerous studies focusing on cell properties and transport behavior. However, previous studies have been unable to assess if differences in E. coli cell surface properties and genomic variation are associated with different environmental habitats. In this study, we investigated the variation in characteristics of E. coli obtained from stream water and stream bottom sediments. Cell properties were measured for 77 genomically different E. coli strains (44 strains isolated from sediments and 33 strains isolated from water) under common stream conditions in the Upper Midwestern United States: pH 8.0, ionic strength 10mM and 22˚C. Measured cell properties include hydrophobicity, zeta potential, net charge, total acidity and extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) composition. Our results indicate that stream sediment E. coli had significantly greater hydrophobicity, greater EPS protein content and EPS sugar content, less negative net charge, and higher point of zero charge than stream water E. coli. A significant positive correlation was observed between hydrophobicity and EPS protein for stream sediment E. coli but not for stream water E. coli. Additionally, E. coli surviving in the same habitat tended to have significantly larger (GTG)5 genome similarity. After accounting for the intrinsic impact from the genome, environmental habitat was determined to be a factor influencing some cell surface properties, such as hydrophobicity. The diversity of cell properties and its resulting impact on particle interactions should be considered for environmental fate and transport modeling of aquatic indicator organisms such as E. coli.
topic Water Quality
Stream
E. coli
particle
surface property
phylo-type
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01732/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoliang ecolisurfacepropertiesdifferbetweenstreamwaterandsedimentenvironments
AT chunyuliao ecolisurfacepropertiesdifferbetweenstreamwaterandsedimentenvironments
AT michaellthompson ecolisurfacepropertiesdifferbetweenstreamwaterandsedimentenvironments
AT michellelynnsoupir ecolisurfacepropertiesdifferbetweenstreamwaterandsedimentenvironments
AT laurarjarboe ecolisurfacepropertiesdifferbetweenstreamwaterandsedimentenvironments
AT philipmdixon ecolisurfacepropertiesdifferbetweenstreamwaterandsedimentenvironments
_version_ 1716798174317772800