Online self-assessment materials: do these make a difference to student learning?

In our changing world where university students are demanding a greater say in their tertiary education, and in particular are demanding a greater flexibility in the way they receive their instruction, it is imperative that we investigate and experiment with course delivery strategies that fulfil th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mary Peat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Learning Technology 2000-12-01
Series:Research in Learning Technology
Online Access:http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/11992
id doaj-081fde13532f4bf286beab253c2724a5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-081fde13532f4bf286beab253c2724a52020-11-24T23:39:41ZengAssociation for Learning Technology Research in Learning Technology2156-70692156-70772000-12-018210.3402/rlt.v8i2.11992Online self-assessment materials: do these make a difference to student learning?Mary PeatIn our changing world where university students are demanding a greater say in their tertiary education, and in particular are demanding a greater flexibility in the way they receive their instruction, it is imperative that we investigate and experiment with course delivery strategies that fulfil these expectations. Online delivery of learning materials is not new, nor is it the panacea for all problems, but it does offer certain advantages for both teachers and students. The flexibility of using the Web may suit certain teaching activities, but more importantly may suit the learning styles and commitments of the students. In the current economic climate students may have to juggle university activities with employment, potentially missing some of the structured teaching and learning sessions. In addition they may not have time to use campus-based course materials or seek face-to-face assistance from staff. An Australian benchmark survey of the first-year experience (Mclnnis, James and McNaught, 1995), found the pressures of part-time work made it extremely difficult for some students to fulfil course expectations. A 1998 survey of firstyear science students at the University of Sydney revealed that 54 per cent of full-time students are undertaking some form of employment, with 31 per cent working ten hours or more per week during semester, and 14 per cent working over fifteen hours per week (Peat and Franklin, 1998). A small shift away from courses comprising all face-to-face activities to courses with a mix of face-to-face and online activities has the potential to help those very students who may otherwise give up when the pressure of time and other commitments seems too difficult to cope withhttp://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/11992
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mary Peat
spellingShingle Mary Peat
Online self-assessment materials: do these make a difference to student learning?
Research in Learning Technology
author_facet Mary Peat
author_sort Mary Peat
title Online self-assessment materials: do these make a difference to student learning?
title_short Online self-assessment materials: do these make a difference to student learning?
title_full Online self-assessment materials: do these make a difference to student learning?
title_fullStr Online self-assessment materials: do these make a difference to student learning?
title_full_unstemmed Online self-assessment materials: do these make a difference to student learning?
title_sort online self-assessment materials: do these make a difference to student learning?
publisher Association for Learning Technology
series Research in Learning Technology
issn 2156-7069
2156-7077
publishDate 2000-12-01
description In our changing world where university students are demanding a greater say in their tertiary education, and in particular are demanding a greater flexibility in the way they receive their instruction, it is imperative that we investigate and experiment with course delivery strategies that fulfil these expectations. Online delivery of learning materials is not new, nor is it the panacea for all problems, but it does offer certain advantages for both teachers and students. The flexibility of using the Web may suit certain teaching activities, but more importantly may suit the learning styles and commitments of the students. In the current economic climate students may have to juggle university activities with employment, potentially missing some of the structured teaching and learning sessions. In addition they may not have time to use campus-based course materials or seek face-to-face assistance from staff. An Australian benchmark survey of the first-year experience (Mclnnis, James and McNaught, 1995), found the pressures of part-time work made it extremely difficult for some students to fulfil course expectations. A 1998 survey of firstyear science students at the University of Sydney revealed that 54 per cent of full-time students are undertaking some form of employment, with 31 per cent working ten hours or more per week during semester, and 14 per cent working over fifteen hours per week (Peat and Franklin, 1998). A small shift away from courses comprising all face-to-face activities to courses with a mix of face-to-face and online activities has the potential to help those very students who may otherwise give up when the pressure of time and other commitments seems too difficult to cope with
url http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/11992
work_keys_str_mv AT marypeat onlineselfassessmentmaterialsdothesemakeadifferencetostudentlearning
_version_ 1725512279259086848