Tenecteplase versus streptokinase thrombolytic therapy in patients with mitral prosthetic valve thrombosis

Objective: Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a dreadful complication of mechanical prosthetic valves. Thrombolytic therapy (TT) for PVT is an alternative to surgery and currently making a leading role. This study compares TT with tenecteplase (TNK) and streptokinase (SK) head to head in patients...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Kathirvel, Gnanaraj Justin Paul, Gorijavaram Prathap kumar, G. Palanisamy, Ganesan Gnanavelu, G. Ravishankar, N. Swaminathan, Sangareddi Venkatesan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-07-01
Series:Indian Heart Journal
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483217301360
id doaj-081dcc924074401f8ef787fa5fdf0b40
record_format Article
spelling doaj-081dcc924074401f8ef787fa5fdf0b402020-11-25T01:03:50ZengElsevierIndian Heart Journal0019-48322018-07-01704506510Tenecteplase versus streptokinase thrombolytic therapy in patients with mitral prosthetic valve thrombosisD. Kathirvel0Gnanaraj Justin Paul1Gorijavaram Prathap kumar2G. Palanisamy3Ganesan Gnanavelu4G. Ravishankar5N. Swaminathan6Sangareddi Venkatesan7Postgraduate in cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Madras Medical College - Rajiv Gandhi Govt General Hospital, Poonamalliee High road, Chennai – 3, India; Corresponding author at: 19/3, VDM Main road, Mangalampet village, Vridhachalam taluk, Cuddalore district – 606104. Tel: 9943375533.Professor of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Madras Medical College - Rajiv Gandhi Govt General Hospital, Poonamalliee High road, Chennai – 3, IndiaSenior Assistant Professor of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Madras Medical College - Rajiv Gandhi Govt General Hospital, Poonamalliee High road, Chennai – 3, IndiaProfessor of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Madras Medical College - Rajiv Gandhi Govt General Hospital, Poonamalliee High road, Chennai – 3, IndiaProfessor of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Madras Medical College - Rajiv Gandhi Govt General Hospital, Poonamalliee High road, Chennai – 3, IndiaProfessor of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Madras Medical College - Rajiv Gandhi Govt General Hospital, Poonamalliee High road, Chennai – 3, IndiaProfessor of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Madras Medical College - Rajiv Gandhi Govt General Hospital, Poonamalliee High road, Chennai – 3, IndiaAssociate Professor of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Madras Medical College - Rajiv Gandhi Govt General Hospital, Poonamalliee High road, Chennai – 3, IndiaObjective: Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a dreadful complication of mechanical prosthetic valves. Thrombolytic therapy (TT) for PVT is an alternative to surgery and currently making a leading role. This study compares TT with tenecteplase (TNK) and streptokinase (SK) head to head in patients with mitral PVT. Methods: In this single center, observational study, patients with mitral PVT diagnosed by clinical data, transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, and fluoroscopy were included. After excluding patients with contraindications for thrombolysis, they were randomly assigned to receive either SK or TNK regimen. Patients were monitored for success or failure of TT and for any complications. Results: Among 52 episodes (47 patients with 5 recurrences) of mechanical mitral PVT, 40 patients were thrombolyzed with SK and 12 patients were thrombolyzed with TNK. Baseline characteristics including demographic profile, clinical and echocardiographic features, and valve types were not statistically significant between the groups. Complete success rate was 77.5% in SK group and 75% in TNK group (p = 0.88). Partial success rate, failure rate, and major complications were not statistically significant between the two groups. Within 12 h of therapy, TNK showed complete success in 33.3% of patients compared to 15% in SK group (p-value <0.02). Minor bleeding was more common in TNK group. Conclusion: Slow infusion of TNK is equally efficacious but more effective than SK in the management of mitral mechanical PVT. 75% to 77.5% of PVT patients completely recovered from TT and it should be the first line therapy where the immediate surgical options were remote. Keywords: Prosthetic valve thrombosis, Thrombolytic therapy, Tenecteplase, Streptokinasehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483217301360
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. Kathirvel
Gnanaraj Justin Paul
Gorijavaram Prathap kumar
G. Palanisamy
Ganesan Gnanavelu
G. Ravishankar
N. Swaminathan
Sangareddi Venkatesan
spellingShingle D. Kathirvel
Gnanaraj Justin Paul
Gorijavaram Prathap kumar
G. Palanisamy
Ganesan Gnanavelu
G. Ravishankar
N. Swaminathan
Sangareddi Venkatesan
Tenecteplase versus streptokinase thrombolytic therapy in patients with mitral prosthetic valve thrombosis
Indian Heart Journal
author_facet D. Kathirvel
Gnanaraj Justin Paul
Gorijavaram Prathap kumar
G. Palanisamy
Ganesan Gnanavelu
G. Ravishankar
N. Swaminathan
Sangareddi Venkatesan
author_sort D. Kathirvel
title Tenecteplase versus streptokinase thrombolytic therapy in patients with mitral prosthetic valve thrombosis
title_short Tenecteplase versus streptokinase thrombolytic therapy in patients with mitral prosthetic valve thrombosis
title_full Tenecteplase versus streptokinase thrombolytic therapy in patients with mitral prosthetic valve thrombosis
title_fullStr Tenecteplase versus streptokinase thrombolytic therapy in patients with mitral prosthetic valve thrombosis
title_full_unstemmed Tenecteplase versus streptokinase thrombolytic therapy in patients with mitral prosthetic valve thrombosis
title_sort tenecteplase versus streptokinase thrombolytic therapy in patients with mitral prosthetic valve thrombosis
publisher Elsevier
series Indian Heart Journal
issn 0019-4832
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Objective: Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a dreadful complication of mechanical prosthetic valves. Thrombolytic therapy (TT) for PVT is an alternative to surgery and currently making a leading role. This study compares TT with tenecteplase (TNK) and streptokinase (SK) head to head in patients with mitral PVT. Methods: In this single center, observational study, patients with mitral PVT diagnosed by clinical data, transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, and fluoroscopy were included. After excluding patients with contraindications for thrombolysis, they were randomly assigned to receive either SK or TNK regimen. Patients were monitored for success or failure of TT and for any complications. Results: Among 52 episodes (47 patients with 5 recurrences) of mechanical mitral PVT, 40 patients were thrombolyzed with SK and 12 patients were thrombolyzed with TNK. Baseline characteristics including demographic profile, clinical and echocardiographic features, and valve types were not statistically significant between the groups. Complete success rate was 77.5% in SK group and 75% in TNK group (p = 0.88). Partial success rate, failure rate, and major complications were not statistically significant between the two groups. Within 12 h of therapy, TNK showed complete success in 33.3% of patients compared to 15% in SK group (p-value <0.02). Minor bleeding was more common in TNK group. Conclusion: Slow infusion of TNK is equally efficacious but more effective than SK in the management of mitral mechanical PVT. 75% to 77.5% of PVT patients completely recovered from TT and it should be the first line therapy where the immediate surgical options were remote. Keywords: Prosthetic valve thrombosis, Thrombolytic therapy, Tenecteplase, Streptokinase
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483217301360
work_keys_str_mv AT dkathirvel tenecteplaseversusstreptokinasethrombolytictherapyinpatientswithmitralprostheticvalvethrombosis
AT gnanarajjustinpaul tenecteplaseversusstreptokinasethrombolytictherapyinpatientswithmitralprostheticvalvethrombosis
AT gorijavaramprathapkumar tenecteplaseversusstreptokinasethrombolytictherapyinpatientswithmitralprostheticvalvethrombosis
AT gpalanisamy tenecteplaseversusstreptokinasethrombolytictherapyinpatientswithmitralprostheticvalvethrombosis
AT ganesangnanavelu tenecteplaseversusstreptokinasethrombolytictherapyinpatientswithmitralprostheticvalvethrombosis
AT gravishankar tenecteplaseversusstreptokinasethrombolytictherapyinpatientswithmitralprostheticvalvethrombosis
AT nswaminathan tenecteplaseversusstreptokinasethrombolytictherapyinpatientswithmitralprostheticvalvethrombosis
AT sangareddivenkatesan tenecteplaseversusstreptokinasethrombolytictherapyinpatientswithmitralprostheticvalvethrombosis
_version_ 1725199137946730496