Diálogo entre Cortes no controle difuso de convencionalidade: e o Papel do Judiciário Brasileiro no Cumprimento das Decisões da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos

Th is paper aims to address about the interjudicial dialogue established between the Brazilian courts and Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the exercise of conventionality control, and the relationship between national courts and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the recognition and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rosana Laura de Castro Farias Ramires, Evandro Pereira Guimarães Ferreira Gomes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centro Universitário de Valença 2013-07-01
Series:Revista Interdisciplinar de Direito
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.faa.edu.br/index.php/FDV/article/view/92/69
id doaj-081c7a24fdce4f9996c6c20187b99e4e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-081c7a24fdce4f9996c6c20187b99e4e2020-11-25T02:12:50ZengCentro Universitário de ValençaRevista Interdisciplinar de Direito2447-42901518-81672013-07-01131Diálogo entre Cortes no controle difuso de convencionalidade: e o Papel do Judiciário Brasileiro no Cumprimento das Decisões da Corte Interamericana de Direitos HumanosRosana Laura de Castro Farias RamiresEvandro Pereira Guimarães Ferreira GomesTh is paper aims to address about the interjudicial dialogue established between the Brazilian courts and Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the exercise of conventionality control, and the relationship between national courts and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the recognition and enforcement by those of international decisions this. It also aims to expose the internal regulatory instruments that impose this interaction and challenges to fi rm up a regulatory framework in this area. Th e problem is to solve the following questions: a Interamericna Court of Human Rights, based on the American Convention imposed a diff use control of conventionality? To what extent the conventionality of control theory prints a interjudicial binding dialogue to national courts? Finally, recognition of the direct enforceability of judgments in inter-American jurisdiction thirst for human rights protection possible? Our hypothesis is based on the diff erence between the legal nature of the procedure and the effi cacy of a foreign judgment and an international decision and the imperative transnational legal certainty of human rights. Th e issue is also to ascertain: what possible functions of the Supreme Court, as the national court to internally develop the inter-American human rights system? Th e methodology used in this work is the doctrinal and jurisprudential analysis on the topic.http://revistas.faa.edu.br/index.php/FDV/article/view/92/69Constitutional righthuman rightsinter jurisdictionDiff use control of conventionalityenforceability sentences internationalautonomy and independence national courts
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rosana Laura de Castro Farias Ramires
Evandro Pereira Guimarães Ferreira Gomes
spellingShingle Rosana Laura de Castro Farias Ramires
Evandro Pereira Guimarães Ferreira Gomes
Diálogo entre Cortes no controle difuso de convencionalidade: e o Papel do Judiciário Brasileiro no Cumprimento das Decisões da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos
Revista Interdisciplinar de Direito
Constitutional right
human rights
inter jurisdiction
Diff use control of conventionality
enforceability sentences international
autonomy and independence national courts
author_facet Rosana Laura de Castro Farias Ramires
Evandro Pereira Guimarães Ferreira Gomes
author_sort Rosana Laura de Castro Farias Ramires
title Diálogo entre Cortes no controle difuso de convencionalidade: e o Papel do Judiciário Brasileiro no Cumprimento das Decisões da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos
title_short Diálogo entre Cortes no controle difuso de convencionalidade: e o Papel do Judiciário Brasileiro no Cumprimento das Decisões da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos
title_full Diálogo entre Cortes no controle difuso de convencionalidade: e o Papel do Judiciário Brasileiro no Cumprimento das Decisões da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos
title_fullStr Diálogo entre Cortes no controle difuso de convencionalidade: e o Papel do Judiciário Brasileiro no Cumprimento das Decisões da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos
title_full_unstemmed Diálogo entre Cortes no controle difuso de convencionalidade: e o Papel do Judiciário Brasileiro no Cumprimento das Decisões da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos
title_sort diálogo entre cortes no controle difuso de convencionalidade: e o papel do judiciário brasileiro no cumprimento das decisões da corte interamericana de direitos humanos
publisher Centro Universitário de Valença
series Revista Interdisciplinar de Direito
issn 2447-4290
1518-8167
publishDate 2013-07-01
description Th is paper aims to address about the interjudicial dialogue established between the Brazilian courts and Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the exercise of conventionality control, and the relationship between national courts and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the recognition and enforcement by those of international decisions this. It also aims to expose the internal regulatory instruments that impose this interaction and challenges to fi rm up a regulatory framework in this area. Th e problem is to solve the following questions: a Interamericna Court of Human Rights, based on the American Convention imposed a diff use control of conventionality? To what extent the conventionality of control theory prints a interjudicial binding dialogue to national courts? Finally, recognition of the direct enforceability of judgments in inter-American jurisdiction thirst for human rights protection possible? Our hypothesis is based on the diff erence between the legal nature of the procedure and the effi cacy of a foreign judgment and an international decision and the imperative transnational legal certainty of human rights. Th e issue is also to ascertain: what possible functions of the Supreme Court, as the national court to internally develop the inter-American human rights system? Th e methodology used in this work is the doctrinal and jurisprudential analysis on the topic.
topic Constitutional right
human rights
inter jurisdiction
Diff use control of conventionality
enforceability sentences international
autonomy and independence national courts
url http://revistas.faa.edu.br/index.php/FDV/article/view/92/69
work_keys_str_mv AT rosanalauradecastrofariasramires dialogoentrecortesnocontroledifusodeconvencionalidadeeopapeldojudiciariobrasileironocumprimentodasdecisoesdacorteinteramericanadedireitoshumanos
AT evandropereiraguimaraesferreiragomes dialogoentrecortesnocontroledifusodeconvencionalidadeeopapeldojudiciariobrasileironocumprimentodasdecisoesdacorteinteramericanadedireitoshumanos
_version_ 1724908021283291136