Direct and indirect control of the initiation of meiotic recombination by DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast.

Meiotic recombination plays an essential role in the proper segregation of chromosomes at meiosis I in many sexually reproducing organisms. Meiotic recombination is initiated by the scheduled formation of genome-wide DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The timing of DSB formation is strictly controlled...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bilge Argunhan, Sarah Farmer, Wing-Kit Leung, Yaroslav Terentyev, Neil Humphryes, Tomomi Tsubouchi, Hiroshi Toyoizumi, Hideo Tsubouchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3677890?pdf=render
id doaj-080c5430a0214f34915880afabff701b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-080c5430a0214f34915880afabff701b2020-11-25T02:15:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0186e6587510.1371/journal.pone.0065875Direct and indirect control of the initiation of meiotic recombination by DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast.Bilge ArgunhanSarah FarmerWing-Kit LeungYaroslav TerentyevNeil HumphryesTomomi TsubouchiHiroshi ToyoizumiHideo TsubouchiMeiotic recombination plays an essential role in the proper segregation of chromosomes at meiosis I in many sexually reproducing organisms. Meiotic recombination is initiated by the scheduled formation of genome-wide DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The timing of DSB formation is strictly controlled because unscheduled DSB formation is detrimental to genome integrity. Here, we investigated the role of DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms in the control of meiotic DSB formation using budding yeast. By using recombination defective mutants in which meiotic DSBs are not repaired, the effect of DNA damage checkpoint mutations on DSB formation was evaluated. The Tel1 (ATM) pathway mainly responds to unresected DSB ends, thus the sae2 mutant background in which DSB ends remain intact was employed. On the other hand, the Mec1 (ATR) pathway is primarily used when DSB ends are resected, thus the rad51 dmc1 double mutant background was employed in which highly resected DSBs accumulate. In order to separate the effect caused by unscheduled cell cycle progression, which is often associated with DNA damage checkpoint defects, we also employed the ndt80 mutation which permanently arrests the meiotic cell cycle at prophase I. In the absence of Tel1, DSB formation was reduced in larger chromosomes (IV, VII, II and XI) whereas no significant reduction was found in smaller chromosomes (III and VI). On the other hand, the absence of Rad17 (a critical component of the ATR pathway) lead to an increase in DSB formation (chromosomes VII and II were tested). We propose that, within prophase I, the Tel1 pathway facilitates DSB formation, especially in bigger chromosomes, while the Mec1 pathway negatively regulates DSB formation. We also identified prophase I exit, which is under the control of the DNA damage checkpoint machinery, to be a critical event associated with down-regulating meiotic DSB formation.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3677890?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bilge Argunhan
Sarah Farmer
Wing-Kit Leung
Yaroslav Terentyev
Neil Humphryes
Tomomi Tsubouchi
Hiroshi Toyoizumi
Hideo Tsubouchi
spellingShingle Bilge Argunhan
Sarah Farmer
Wing-Kit Leung
Yaroslav Terentyev
Neil Humphryes
Tomomi Tsubouchi
Hiroshi Toyoizumi
Hideo Tsubouchi
Direct and indirect control of the initiation of meiotic recombination by DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Bilge Argunhan
Sarah Farmer
Wing-Kit Leung
Yaroslav Terentyev
Neil Humphryes
Tomomi Tsubouchi
Hiroshi Toyoizumi
Hideo Tsubouchi
author_sort Bilge Argunhan
title Direct and indirect control of the initiation of meiotic recombination by DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast.
title_short Direct and indirect control of the initiation of meiotic recombination by DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast.
title_full Direct and indirect control of the initiation of meiotic recombination by DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast.
title_fullStr Direct and indirect control of the initiation of meiotic recombination by DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast.
title_full_unstemmed Direct and indirect control of the initiation of meiotic recombination by DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast.
title_sort direct and indirect control of the initiation of meiotic recombination by dna damage checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Meiotic recombination plays an essential role in the proper segregation of chromosomes at meiosis I in many sexually reproducing organisms. Meiotic recombination is initiated by the scheduled formation of genome-wide DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The timing of DSB formation is strictly controlled because unscheduled DSB formation is detrimental to genome integrity. Here, we investigated the role of DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms in the control of meiotic DSB formation using budding yeast. By using recombination defective mutants in which meiotic DSBs are not repaired, the effect of DNA damage checkpoint mutations on DSB formation was evaluated. The Tel1 (ATM) pathway mainly responds to unresected DSB ends, thus the sae2 mutant background in which DSB ends remain intact was employed. On the other hand, the Mec1 (ATR) pathway is primarily used when DSB ends are resected, thus the rad51 dmc1 double mutant background was employed in which highly resected DSBs accumulate. In order to separate the effect caused by unscheduled cell cycle progression, which is often associated with DNA damage checkpoint defects, we also employed the ndt80 mutation which permanently arrests the meiotic cell cycle at prophase I. In the absence of Tel1, DSB formation was reduced in larger chromosomes (IV, VII, II and XI) whereas no significant reduction was found in smaller chromosomes (III and VI). On the other hand, the absence of Rad17 (a critical component of the ATR pathway) lead to an increase in DSB formation (chromosomes VII and II were tested). We propose that, within prophase I, the Tel1 pathway facilitates DSB formation, especially in bigger chromosomes, while the Mec1 pathway negatively regulates DSB formation. We also identified prophase I exit, which is under the control of the DNA damage checkpoint machinery, to be a critical event associated with down-regulating meiotic DSB formation.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3677890?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT bilgeargunhan directandindirectcontroloftheinitiationofmeioticrecombinationbydnadamagecheckpointmechanismsinbuddingyeast
AT sarahfarmer directandindirectcontroloftheinitiationofmeioticrecombinationbydnadamagecheckpointmechanismsinbuddingyeast
AT wingkitleung directandindirectcontroloftheinitiationofmeioticrecombinationbydnadamagecheckpointmechanismsinbuddingyeast
AT yaroslavterentyev directandindirectcontroloftheinitiationofmeioticrecombinationbydnadamagecheckpointmechanismsinbuddingyeast
AT neilhumphryes directandindirectcontroloftheinitiationofmeioticrecombinationbydnadamagecheckpointmechanismsinbuddingyeast
AT tomomitsubouchi directandindirectcontroloftheinitiationofmeioticrecombinationbydnadamagecheckpointmechanismsinbuddingyeast
AT hiroshitoyoizumi directandindirectcontroloftheinitiationofmeioticrecombinationbydnadamagecheckpointmechanismsinbuddingyeast
AT hideotsubouchi directandindirectcontroloftheinitiationofmeioticrecombinationbydnadamagecheckpointmechanismsinbuddingyeast
_version_ 1724896559472050176