The Roles of Size and Size Difference in Australian and Chinese Inter-firm Collaborations

There has been considerable debate on the contribution and significance of firm size to the establishment, operation and success of business collaboration. One important source of this debate arises from differing definitions of firm size used in previous research. This paper uses firm size categori...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu Zhang, Zhiming Cheng, Charles Harvie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Wollongong 2013-01-01
Series:Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal
Online Access:http://Collaboration; Size; Size Difference; Australia; China
id doaj-07f629e16742417983307b0fd0c81454
record_format Article
spelling doaj-07f629e16742417983307b0fd0c814542020-11-24T21:41:28ZengUniversity of WollongongAustralasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal1834-20001834-20192013-01-01723348The Roles of Size and Size Difference in Australian and Chinese Inter-firm CollaborationsYu ZhangZhiming ChengCharles HarvieThere has been considerable debate on the contribution and significance of firm size to the establishment, operation and success of business collaboration. One important source of this debate arises from differing definitions of firm size used in previous research. This paper uses firm size categories and size differences between collaborating firms to examine their contribution to the formation and performance of inter-firmcollaboration in Australia and China. Both qualitative case study and quantitative data analyses are adopted in this paper. Results from both the qualitative case study and quantitative study in Australia and China show that size plays a significant positive role in the formation and performance of business collaboration. Firmsprefer collaborating with larger partners. Bigger firms are more likely to achieve success collaborations. However, size difference plays a negative role in business collaboration. Collaborating with a bigger partner makes it harder to succeed. On the other hand, size and size difference play very different roles in performanceand outcomes of business collaboration in different countries.This paper compares the roles of firm size and size difference in Australian and Chinese inter-firm collaboration. The results provide important strategic implications for business managers, industry regulators, and policy decision makers regarding international business collaboration.Collaboration; Size; Size Difference; Australia; China
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yu Zhang
Zhiming Cheng
Charles Harvie
spellingShingle Yu Zhang
Zhiming Cheng
Charles Harvie
The Roles of Size and Size Difference in Australian and Chinese Inter-firm Collaborations
Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal
author_facet Yu Zhang
Zhiming Cheng
Charles Harvie
author_sort Yu Zhang
title The Roles of Size and Size Difference in Australian and Chinese Inter-firm Collaborations
title_short The Roles of Size and Size Difference in Australian and Chinese Inter-firm Collaborations
title_full The Roles of Size and Size Difference in Australian and Chinese Inter-firm Collaborations
title_fullStr The Roles of Size and Size Difference in Australian and Chinese Inter-firm Collaborations
title_full_unstemmed The Roles of Size and Size Difference in Australian and Chinese Inter-firm Collaborations
title_sort roles of size and size difference in australian and chinese inter-firm collaborations
publisher University of Wollongong
series Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal
issn 1834-2000
1834-2019
publishDate 2013-01-01
description There has been considerable debate on the contribution and significance of firm size to the establishment, operation and success of business collaboration. One important source of this debate arises from differing definitions of firm size used in previous research. This paper uses firm size categories and size differences between collaborating firms to examine their contribution to the formation and performance of inter-firmcollaboration in Australia and China. Both qualitative case study and quantitative data analyses are adopted in this paper. Results from both the qualitative case study and quantitative study in Australia and China show that size plays a significant positive role in the formation and performance of business collaboration. Firmsprefer collaborating with larger partners. Bigger firms are more likely to achieve success collaborations. However, size difference plays a negative role in business collaboration. Collaborating with a bigger partner makes it harder to succeed. On the other hand, size and size difference play very different roles in performanceand outcomes of business collaboration in different countries.This paper compares the roles of firm size and size difference in Australian and Chinese inter-firm collaboration. The results provide important strategic implications for business managers, industry regulators, and policy decision makers regarding international business collaboration.
url http://Collaboration; Size; Size Difference; Australia; China
work_keys_str_mv AT yuzhang therolesofsizeandsizedifferenceinaustralianandchineseinterfirmcollaborations
AT zhimingcheng therolesofsizeandsizedifferenceinaustralianandchineseinterfirmcollaborations
AT charlesharvie therolesofsizeandsizedifferenceinaustralianandchineseinterfirmcollaborations
AT yuzhang rolesofsizeandsizedifferenceinaustralianandchineseinterfirmcollaborations
AT zhimingcheng rolesofsizeandsizedifferenceinaustralianandchineseinterfirmcollaborations
AT charlesharvie rolesofsizeandsizedifferenceinaustralianandchineseinterfirmcollaborations
_version_ 1725921842718310400