Reliability of ultrasound hepatorenal index and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction techniques in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, with magnetic resonance spectroscopy as the reference standard.
<h4>Purpose</h4>To evaluate the reliability of ultrasound hepatorenal index (US-HRI) and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) techniques in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, with magnetic resonance spectroscopy proton density fat fraction (MRS-PDFF) as the...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255768 |
id |
doaj-07f1f3af4f464bbba48a0f37d2a20149 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-07f1f3af4f464bbba48a0f37d2a201492021-08-17T04:30:43ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01168e025576810.1371/journal.pone.0255768Reliability of ultrasound hepatorenal index and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction techniques in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, with magnetic resonance spectroscopy as the reference standard.Bien Van TranKouichi UjitaAyako Taketomi-TakahashiHiromi HirasawaTakayuki SutoYoshito Tsushima<h4>Purpose</h4>To evaluate the reliability of ultrasound hepatorenal index (US-HRI) and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) techniques in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, with magnetic resonance spectroscopy proton density fat fraction (MRS-PDFF) as the reference standard.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Fifty-two adult volunteers (30 men, 22 women; age, 31.5 ± 6.5 years) who had no history of kidney disease or viral/alcoholic hepatitis were recruited to undergo abdominal US, MRI, and MRS examinations. US-HRI was calculated from the average of three pairs of regions of interest (ROIs) measurements placed in the liver parenchyma and right renal cortex. On MRI, the six-point Dixon technique was employed for calculating proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). An MRS sequence with a typical voxel size of 27 ml was chosen to estimate MRS-PDFF as the gold standard. The data were evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.<h4>Results</h4>The Pearson correlation coefficients of US-HRI and MRI-PDFF with MRS-PDFF were 0.38 (p = 0.005) and 0.95 (p<0.001), respectively. If MRS-PDFF ≥5.56% was defined as the gold standard of fatty liver disease, the areas under the curve (AUCs), cut-off values, sensitivities and specificities of US-HRI and MRI-PDFF were 0.74, 1.54, 50%, 91.7% and 0.99, 2.75%, 100%, 88.9%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of US-HRI and MRI-PDFF were 0.70 and 0.85.<h4>Conclusion</h4>MRI-PDFF was more reliable than US-HRI in diagnosing hepatic steatosis.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255768 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bien Van Tran Kouichi Ujita Ayako Taketomi-Takahashi Hiromi Hirasawa Takayuki Suto Yoshito Tsushima |
spellingShingle |
Bien Van Tran Kouichi Ujita Ayako Taketomi-Takahashi Hiromi Hirasawa Takayuki Suto Yoshito Tsushima Reliability of ultrasound hepatorenal index and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction techniques in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, with magnetic resonance spectroscopy as the reference standard. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Bien Van Tran Kouichi Ujita Ayako Taketomi-Takahashi Hiromi Hirasawa Takayuki Suto Yoshito Tsushima |
author_sort |
Bien Van Tran |
title |
Reliability of ultrasound hepatorenal index and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction techniques in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, with magnetic resonance spectroscopy as the reference standard. |
title_short |
Reliability of ultrasound hepatorenal index and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction techniques in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, with magnetic resonance spectroscopy as the reference standard. |
title_full |
Reliability of ultrasound hepatorenal index and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction techniques in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, with magnetic resonance spectroscopy as the reference standard. |
title_fullStr |
Reliability of ultrasound hepatorenal index and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction techniques in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, with magnetic resonance spectroscopy as the reference standard. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reliability of ultrasound hepatorenal index and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction techniques in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, with magnetic resonance spectroscopy as the reference standard. |
title_sort |
reliability of ultrasound hepatorenal index and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction techniques in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, with magnetic resonance spectroscopy as the reference standard. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
<h4>Purpose</h4>To evaluate the reliability of ultrasound hepatorenal index (US-HRI) and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) techniques in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, with magnetic resonance spectroscopy proton density fat fraction (MRS-PDFF) as the reference standard.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Fifty-two adult volunteers (30 men, 22 women; age, 31.5 ± 6.5 years) who had no history of kidney disease or viral/alcoholic hepatitis were recruited to undergo abdominal US, MRI, and MRS examinations. US-HRI was calculated from the average of three pairs of regions of interest (ROIs) measurements placed in the liver parenchyma and right renal cortex. On MRI, the six-point Dixon technique was employed for calculating proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). An MRS sequence with a typical voxel size of 27 ml was chosen to estimate MRS-PDFF as the gold standard. The data were evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.<h4>Results</h4>The Pearson correlation coefficients of US-HRI and MRI-PDFF with MRS-PDFF were 0.38 (p = 0.005) and 0.95 (p<0.001), respectively. If MRS-PDFF ≥5.56% was defined as the gold standard of fatty liver disease, the areas under the curve (AUCs), cut-off values, sensitivities and specificities of US-HRI and MRI-PDFF were 0.74, 1.54, 50%, 91.7% and 0.99, 2.75%, 100%, 88.9%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of US-HRI and MRI-PDFF were 0.70 and 0.85.<h4>Conclusion</h4>MRI-PDFF was more reliable than US-HRI in diagnosing hepatic steatosis. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255768 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bienvantran reliabilityofultrasoundhepatorenalindexandmagneticresonanceimagingprotondensityfatfractiontechniquesinthediagnosisofhepaticsteatosiswithmagneticresonancespectroscopyasthereferencestandard AT kouichiujita reliabilityofultrasoundhepatorenalindexandmagneticresonanceimagingprotondensityfatfractiontechniquesinthediagnosisofhepaticsteatosiswithmagneticresonancespectroscopyasthereferencestandard AT ayakotaketomitakahashi reliabilityofultrasoundhepatorenalindexandmagneticresonanceimagingprotondensityfatfractiontechniquesinthediagnosisofhepaticsteatosiswithmagneticresonancespectroscopyasthereferencestandard AT hiromihirasawa reliabilityofultrasoundhepatorenalindexandmagneticresonanceimagingprotondensityfatfractiontechniquesinthediagnosisofhepaticsteatosiswithmagneticresonancespectroscopyasthereferencestandard AT takayukisuto reliabilityofultrasoundhepatorenalindexandmagneticresonanceimagingprotondensityfatfractiontechniquesinthediagnosisofhepaticsteatosiswithmagneticresonancespectroscopyasthereferencestandard AT yoshitotsushima reliabilityofultrasoundhepatorenalindexandmagneticresonanceimagingprotondensityfatfractiontechniquesinthediagnosisofhepaticsteatosiswithmagneticresonancespectroscopyasthereferencestandard |
_version_ |
1721205503631032320 |