Considerable practice variation in use of pathological high-risk T1-CRC criteria: Why, and how to do better?
Main Authors: | Mathieu Pioche, Yutaka Saito |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Endoscopy International Open |
Online Access: | http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1243-0129 |
Similar Items
-
Prevention of esophageal stenosis after large endoscopic submucosal dissection: is there a better way to use steroids?
by: Mathieu Pioche, et al.
Published: (2015-02-01) -
Why should we systematically specify the clinical relevance of images observed at capsule endoscopy?
by: Jean Christophe Saurin, et al.
Published: (2014-06-01) -
Endoscopic removal of colorectal T1 cancers: Why is a 1-year follow-up recommended by ESGE when resection is R0 and curative?
by: Mathieu Pioche, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Bacteria-related changes in host DNA methylation and the risk for CRC
by: Iradj Sobhani, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Colo-rectum: why do we not find diminutive sessile serrated polyp?
by: Mathieu Pioche, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)