Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology

This article addresses the need for cognitive science to loop back and examine its roots and presuppositions, pointing out the three recursive issues: 1.) The observer effect or how observing a phenomenon affects the phenomenon that is being observed, an issue that has been acknowledged by natural s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Florian Klauser, Urban Kordeš
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Croatian Interdisciplinary Society 2018-12-01
Series:Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:http://indecs.eu/2018/indecs2018-pp524-532.pdf
id doaj-07eef2aaced941e58903bb3c8950c96b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-07eef2aaced941e58903bb3c8950c96b2020-11-25T00:29:11ZengCroatian Interdisciplinary SocietyInterdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems1334-46841334-46762018-12-0116452453210.7906/indecs.16.4.1Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and EpistemologyFlorian Klauser0Urban Kordeš1University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Center for Cognitive Science,Ljubljana, SloveniaUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Center for Cognitive Science,Ljubljana, SloveniaThis article addresses the need for cognitive science to loop back and examine its roots and presuppositions, pointing out the three recursive issues: 1.) The observer effect or how observing a phenomenon affects the phenomenon that is being observed, an issue that has been acknowledged by natural science, which cognitive science attempts to emulate, and empirical phenomenology, but not cognitive science itself; 2.) Human kinds or how our research affects us, the researchers, and society (people’s self-understandings), an issue which forms a loop with the observer effect – observation thus changing the observed, the observer, as well as itself, and 3.) The dangers of over-eager extrapolation or how complexity is lost during shifts in explanatory level, issues pertaining to using findings from studies of one explanatory level (e.g. experiments with rats) to inform a different explanatory level (issues within human society). Finally, the article presents a fourth recursive loop which presents a potential solution to the above: a self-correcting mechanism that allows science to recursively correct its mistakes and improve on its own work.http://indecs.eu/2018/indecs2018-pp524-532.pdfobserver effecthuman kindsrecursionlooping effectsphilosophy of science
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Florian Klauser
Urban Kordeš
spellingShingle Florian Klauser
Urban Kordeš
Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
observer effect
human kinds
recursion
looping effects
philosophy of science
author_facet Florian Klauser
Urban Kordeš
author_sort Florian Klauser
title Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology
title_short Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology
title_full Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology
title_fullStr Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology
title_full_unstemmed Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology
title_sort loops and recursions in cognitive science: cross-roads between methodology and epistemology
publisher Croatian Interdisciplinary Society
series Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
issn 1334-4684
1334-4676
publishDate 2018-12-01
description This article addresses the need for cognitive science to loop back and examine its roots and presuppositions, pointing out the three recursive issues: 1.) The observer effect or how observing a phenomenon affects the phenomenon that is being observed, an issue that has been acknowledged by natural science, which cognitive science attempts to emulate, and empirical phenomenology, but not cognitive science itself; 2.) Human kinds or how our research affects us, the researchers, and society (people’s self-understandings), an issue which forms a loop with the observer effect – observation thus changing the observed, the observer, as well as itself, and 3.) The dangers of over-eager extrapolation or how complexity is lost during shifts in explanatory level, issues pertaining to using findings from studies of one explanatory level (e.g. experiments with rats) to inform a different explanatory level (issues within human society). Finally, the article presents a fourth recursive loop which presents a potential solution to the above: a self-correcting mechanism that allows science to recursively correct its mistakes and improve on its own work.
topic observer effect
human kinds
recursion
looping effects
philosophy of science
url http://indecs.eu/2018/indecs2018-pp524-532.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT florianklauser loopsandrecursionsincognitivesciencecrossroadsbetweenmethodologyandepistemology
AT urbankordes loopsandrecursionsincognitivesciencecrossroadsbetweenmethodologyandepistemology
_version_ 1725332794850148352