Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology
This article addresses the need for cognitive science to loop back and examine its roots and presuppositions, pointing out the three recursive issues: 1.) The observer effect or how observing a phenomenon affects the phenomenon that is being observed, an issue that has been acknowledged by natural s...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Croatian Interdisciplinary Society
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://indecs.eu/2018/indecs2018-pp524-532.pdf |
id |
doaj-07eef2aaced941e58903bb3c8950c96b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-07eef2aaced941e58903bb3c8950c96b2020-11-25T00:29:11ZengCroatian Interdisciplinary SocietyInterdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems1334-46841334-46762018-12-0116452453210.7906/indecs.16.4.1Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and EpistemologyFlorian Klauser0Urban Kordeš1University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Center for Cognitive Science,Ljubljana, SloveniaUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Center for Cognitive Science,Ljubljana, SloveniaThis article addresses the need for cognitive science to loop back and examine its roots and presuppositions, pointing out the three recursive issues: 1.) The observer effect or how observing a phenomenon affects the phenomenon that is being observed, an issue that has been acknowledged by natural science, which cognitive science attempts to emulate, and empirical phenomenology, but not cognitive science itself; 2.) Human kinds or how our research affects us, the researchers, and society (people’s self-understandings), an issue which forms a loop with the observer effect – observation thus changing the observed, the observer, as well as itself, and 3.) The dangers of over-eager extrapolation or how complexity is lost during shifts in explanatory level, issues pertaining to using findings from studies of one explanatory level (e.g. experiments with rats) to inform a different explanatory level (issues within human society). Finally, the article presents a fourth recursive loop which presents a potential solution to the above: a self-correcting mechanism that allows science to recursively correct its mistakes and improve on its own work.http://indecs.eu/2018/indecs2018-pp524-532.pdfobserver effecthuman kindsrecursionlooping effectsphilosophy of science |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Florian Klauser Urban Kordeš |
spellingShingle |
Florian Klauser Urban Kordeš Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems observer effect human kinds recursion looping effects philosophy of science |
author_facet |
Florian Klauser Urban Kordeš |
author_sort |
Florian Klauser |
title |
Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology |
title_short |
Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology |
title_full |
Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology |
title_fullStr |
Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology |
title_sort |
loops and recursions in cognitive science: cross-roads between methodology and epistemology |
publisher |
Croatian Interdisciplinary Society |
series |
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems |
issn |
1334-4684 1334-4676 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
This article addresses the need for cognitive science to loop back and examine its roots and presuppositions, pointing out the three recursive issues: 1.) The observer effect or how observing a phenomenon affects the phenomenon that is being observed, an issue that has been acknowledged by natural science, which cognitive science attempts to emulate, and empirical phenomenology, but not cognitive science itself; 2.) Human kinds or how our research affects us, the researchers, and society (people’s self-understandings), an issue which forms a loop with the observer effect – observation thus changing the observed, the observer, as well as itself, and 3.) The dangers of over-eager extrapolation or how complexity is lost during shifts in explanatory level, issues pertaining to using findings from studies of one explanatory level (e.g. experiments with rats) to inform a different explanatory level (issues within human society). Finally, the article presents a fourth recursive loop which presents a potential solution to the above: a self-correcting mechanism that allows science to recursively correct its mistakes and improve on its own work. |
topic |
observer effect human kinds recursion looping effects philosophy of science |
url |
http://indecs.eu/2018/indecs2018-pp524-532.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT florianklauser loopsandrecursionsincognitivesciencecrossroadsbetweenmethodologyandepistemology AT urbankordes loopsandrecursionsincognitivesciencecrossroadsbetweenmethodologyandepistemology |
_version_ |
1725332794850148352 |