| Summary: | Monte Carlo simulation using Simple Random Sampling (SRS) technique is popularly known for its ability to handle complex uncertainty problems. However, to produce a reasonable result, it requires huge sample size. This makes it to be computationally expensive, time consuming and unfit for online power system applications. In this article, the performance of Latin Hypercube
Sampling (LHS) technique is explored and compared with SRS in term of accuracy, robustness and speed for small signal stability application in a wind generator-connected power system. The analysis is performed using probabilistic techniques via eigenvalue analysis on two standard networks (Single Machine Infinite Bus and IEEE 16–machine 68 bus test system). The
accuracy of the two sampling techniques is determined by comparing their different sample sizes with the IDEAL (conventional). The robustness is determined based on a significant variance reduction when the experiment is repeated 100 times with different sample sizes using the two sampling
techniques in turn. Some of the results show that sample sizes generated from LHS for small signal stability application produces the same result as that of the IDEAL values starting from 100 sample size. This shows that about 100 sample size of random variable generated using LHS method is good enough to
produce reasonable results for practical purpose in small signal stability application. It is also revealed that LHS has the least variance when the experiment is repeated 100 times compared to SRS techniques. This signifies the robustness of LHS over that of SRS techniques. 100 sample size of LHS produces the same result as that of the conventional method consisting of 50000
sample size. The reduced sample size required by LHS gives it computational speed advantage (about six times) over the conventional method.
|
|---|
