The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases

In analysing 'wrongful life' cases, comparative law is used extensively. This article examines these wrongful life cases, especially in light of the contradicting outcomes in different jurisdictions across the world, with the Dutch Kelly case and the South African decision in Stewart v Bot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ivo Giesen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University School of Law 2012-05-01
Series:Utrecht Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.194/
id doaj-07d25ac393bc405aac8c48f8d6e315ea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-07d25ac393bc405aac8c48f8d6e315ea2020-11-25T03:57:43ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2012-05-0182355410.18352/ulr.194188The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ CasesIvo Giesen0Utrecht University School of LawIn analysing 'wrongful life' cases, comparative law is used extensively. This article examines these wrongful life cases, especially in light of the contradicting outcomes in different jurisdictions across the world, with the Dutch Kelly case and the South African decision in Stewart v Botha as its main examples. I will test the hypothesis that it is not so much the outcomes and (more importantly) the arguments found elsewhere through the comparative law method that are decisive in highly debated cases like those concerning wrongful life, but that instead it is something else that decides the issue, something I would define as the cultural background of, or the legal policies within a tort law system.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.194/wrongful lifecomparative lawtort lawpolicy decisions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ivo Giesen
spellingShingle Ivo Giesen
The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases
Utrecht Law Review
wrongful life
comparative law
tort law
policy decisions
author_facet Ivo Giesen
author_sort Ivo Giesen
title The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases
title_short The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases
title_full The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases
title_fullStr The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases
title_full_unstemmed The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases
title_sort use and influence of comparative law in ‘wrongful life’ cases
publisher Utrecht University School of Law
series Utrecht Law Review
issn 1871-515X
publishDate 2012-05-01
description In analysing 'wrongful life' cases, comparative law is used extensively. This article examines these wrongful life cases, especially in light of the contradicting outcomes in different jurisdictions across the world, with the Dutch Kelly case and the South African decision in Stewart v Botha as its main examples. I will test the hypothesis that it is not so much the outcomes and (more importantly) the arguments found elsewhere through the comparative law method that are decisive in highly debated cases like those concerning wrongful life, but that instead it is something else that decides the issue, something I would define as the cultural background of, or the legal policies within a tort law system.
topic wrongful life
comparative law
tort law
policy decisions
url http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.194/
work_keys_str_mv AT ivogiesen theuseandinfluenceofcomparativelawinwrongfullifecases
AT ivogiesen useandinfluenceofcomparativelawinwrongfullifecases
_version_ 1724459056357179392