The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases
In analysing 'wrongful life' cases, comparative law is used extensively. This article examines these wrongful life cases, especially in light of the contradicting outcomes in different jurisdictions across the world, with the Dutch Kelly case and the South African decision in Stewart v Bot...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Utrecht University School of Law
2012-05-01
|
Series: | Utrecht Law Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.194/ |
id |
doaj-07d25ac393bc405aac8c48f8d6e315ea |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-07d25ac393bc405aac8c48f8d6e315ea2020-11-25T03:57:43ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2012-05-0182355410.18352/ulr.194188The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ CasesIvo Giesen0Utrecht University School of LawIn analysing 'wrongful life' cases, comparative law is used extensively. This article examines these wrongful life cases, especially in light of the contradicting outcomes in different jurisdictions across the world, with the Dutch Kelly case and the South African decision in Stewart v Botha as its main examples. I will test the hypothesis that it is not so much the outcomes and (more importantly) the arguments found elsewhere through the comparative law method that are decisive in highly debated cases like those concerning wrongful life, but that instead it is something else that decides the issue, something I would define as the cultural background of, or the legal policies within a tort law system.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.194/wrongful lifecomparative lawtort lawpolicy decisions |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ivo Giesen |
spellingShingle |
Ivo Giesen The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases Utrecht Law Review wrongful life comparative law tort law policy decisions |
author_facet |
Ivo Giesen |
author_sort |
Ivo Giesen |
title |
The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases |
title_short |
The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases |
title_full |
The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases |
title_fullStr |
The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Use and Influence of Comparative Law in ‘Wrongful Life’ Cases |
title_sort |
use and influence of comparative law in ‘wrongful life’ cases |
publisher |
Utrecht University School of Law |
series |
Utrecht Law Review |
issn |
1871-515X |
publishDate |
2012-05-01 |
description |
In analysing 'wrongful life' cases, comparative law is used extensively. This article examines these wrongful life cases, especially in light of the contradicting outcomes in different jurisdictions across the world, with the Dutch Kelly case and the South African decision in Stewart v Botha as its main examples. I will test the hypothesis that it is not so much the outcomes and (more importantly) the arguments found elsewhere through the comparative law method that are decisive in highly debated cases like those concerning wrongful life, but that instead it is something else that decides the issue, something I would define as the cultural background of, or the legal policies within a tort law system. |
topic |
wrongful life comparative law tort law policy decisions |
url |
http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.194/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ivogiesen theuseandinfluenceofcomparativelawinwrongfullifecases AT ivogiesen useandinfluenceofcomparativelawinwrongfullifecases |
_version_ |
1724459056357179392 |