Comparison of the centering ability of the ProTaper Universal, ProFile and Twisted File Rotary Systems

Aim: To determine the centering ability of Twisted File™ rotary system compared with ProTaper Universal™ and ProFile™ rotary systems by evaluating pre- and postoperative cross-sectional images of the apical root canals third. Methods: Thirty mesiobuccal canals of human mandibular first molars were d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Daniela de Andrade Mendes, Carlos Menezes Aguiar, Andréa Cruz Câmara
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2015-11-01
Series:	Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Subjects:	Instruments ProTaper Universal Root canal Root canal preparation Twisted File
Online Access:	https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641618

Similar Items

A comparative study of protaper and twisted file nickel titanium instruments in curved canals preparation
by: De Lima Dias José Rodolpho, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal files by using cone-beam computed tomography
by: Amr M Elnaghy, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using rotary ProTaper, K3XF, twisted and hand K-file system: An ex vivo study
by: Priyanka Ghogre, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

AN ”IN VITRO” STUDY ON THE CANAL SHAPING CAPACITY OF PRO TAPER FILES
by: Ionela Elisabeta Ciobanu, et al.
Published: (2013-07-01)

Antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ System
by: Andréa Cruz Câmara, et al.
Published: (2015-11-01)

Evaluation of the Apical Seal in Root Canals Prepared with Rotary ProTaper Files and Obturated by Different Methods
by: Sabah A Ismail, et al.
Published: (2011-04-01)

Torsional resistance of three ProTaper rotary systems
by: Abdullah Alqedairi, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)

Effects on the incidence of dentinal microcracks in curved root canal preparation with ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold
by: LI Shuhui, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)

Apically extruded debris associated with ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold and TruNatomy systems: An in vitro study
by: Neslihan Yılmaz Çırakoglu, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain after single visit endodontic treatment using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary file systems: A randomized clinical trial
by: Neha Arora, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Canal Centring Ability of ProTaper and Mtwo Rotary Systems in Curved Canals
by: Turkaydin Dilek Erbay, et al.
Published: (2014-07-01)

The Effect of Autoclave Sterilization on the Fracture Resistance of ProTaper Rotary Files
by: N Roghanizad, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01)

Efficacy of protaper instruments during endodontic retreatment
by: Luiz Fernando Fariniuk, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Assessment of canal walls after biomechanical preparation of root canals instrumented with protaper universalTM rotary system
by: Carlos Menezes Aguiar, et al.
Published: (2009-12-01)

Fractographic analysis of ProTaper and Mtwo systems: Breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars
by: Fatima Betul Basturk, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)

Effect of environment on cyclic fatigue of ProTaper Next rotary files
by: Tariq S Abuhaimed
Published: (2018-01-01)

Effectiveness of the self-adjusting file versus ProTaper systems to remove the smear layer in artificially induced internal root resorption cavities
by: Senem Yigit Özer, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

A scanning electron microscopic study of smear layer remaining following use of Greater Taper rotary instruments
by: S Soumya, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01)

ProTaper files in root canal preparation: Case report
by: Brkanić Tatjana
Published: (2005-01-01)

Comparison of the shaping ability of Twisted Files with ProTaper and RevoS nickel-titanium instruments in simulated canals
by: Cumhur Aydin, et al.
Published: (2012-09-01)

A comparative finite analysis of the mechanical behavior of ProTaper NEXT and WaveOne rotary files
by: Nada Omar, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01)

Comparison of shaping ability of ProTaper Next and 2Shape nickel–titanium files in simulated severe curved canals
by: Azizi, H., et al.
Published: (2018)

EFFICACY OF PROTAPER NEXT AND PROTAPER UNIVERSAL RETREATMENT SYSTEMS IN REMOVING GUTTA-PERCHA IN CURVED ROOT CANALS DURING ROOT CANAL RETREATMENT
by: Taha ÖZYÜREK, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01)

Comparative evaluation of dentinal defects induced by hand files, hyflex, protaper next and one shape during canal preparation: A stereomicroscopic study
by: Ekta Garg, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and ProTaper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth
by: Mohammad Reza Azar, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)

The shaping and cleaning abilities of self-adjusting files in the preparation of canals with isthmuses after glidepath enlargement with ISO or ProTaper Universal NiTi files
by: Zhaohui Liu, et al.
Published: (2016-03-01)

Wear promoted in the apical third of simulated canals after instrumentation with protaper universal system
by: Kathrein Tapia da Silva, et al.
Published: (2009-10-01)

Computed tomography evaluation of root canal transportation using ProTaper, Race and Sendoline rotary systems: an ex vivo study
by: Saberi E, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

مقایسه سه سیستم چرخشی نیکل تیتانیوم Reciproc، ProTaper و ProTaper Next در زمان کار و تغییر میزان خمیدگی کانال ریشه
by: سعید مرادی, et al.
Published: (2015-06-01)

Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of V-Taper 2H, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex CM in curved canals using cone-beam computed tomography: An in vitro Study
by: Pratima Ramakrishna Shenoi, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Shaping ability of the profile 25/0.06 and protaper F2 in rotary motion, and reciproc in simulated canals
by: Gül Çelik, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

CBCT Evaluation of Gutta-Percha Removal Using ProTaper and Mtwo Retreatment Files, WaveOne, and Hedstrom Files: An Ex Vivo Study
by: Kumari Madhu, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

A comparative study on the shaping ability of K3, ProFile and ProTaper instruments in simulated curved root canals
by: Chinni Suneelkumar, et al.
Published: (2010-11-01)

The Effect of Root Canal Preparation on the Development of Dentin Cracks
by: Amin Salem Milani, et al.
Published: (2012-10-01)

Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal
by: Mary Kinue Nakamune Uezu, et al.
Published: (2010-12-01)

Influence of NiTi alloy on the root canal shaping capabilities of the ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold rotary instrument systems
by: Jussaro Alves DUQUE, et al.

In vitro evaluation of the failure of rotary instruments Mtwo® y ProTaper®
by: Sandra Bibiana Rodríguez Gutiérrez, et al.
Published: (2013-07-01)

Efficacy of Passive Ultrasonic Activation Assisted Hand vs. Rotary Retreatment Files in the Removal of Root Canal Filling Material: An In Vitro Study
by: Sumanthini V Margasahayam, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)

Endodontic Shaping Performance Using Nickel–Titanium Hand and Motor ProTaper Systems by Novice Dental Students
by: Ming-Gene Tu, et al.
Published: (2008-05-01)

Micro-computed tomographic comparative evaluation of efficacy of different rotary instrument systems for removal of gutta-percha/bioceramic sealer from oval root canals (in vitro study)
by: Samia Mohamed Elsherief, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_j9cmln5vdlu445k7p90f6c1nn4