The Benefit of a Visually Guided Beamformer in a Dynamic Speech Task

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a visually guided hearing aid (VGHA) under conditions designed to capture some aspects of “real-world” communication settings. The VGHA uses eye gaze to steer the acoustic look direction of a highly directional beamforming microphone array. Al...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Virginia Best, Elin Roverud, Timothy Streeter, Christine R. Mason, Gerald Kidd
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-07-01
Series:Trends in Hearing
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216517722304
id doaj-07c330481a2b495f82e91a9009488ff8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-07c330481a2b495f82e91a9009488ff82020-11-25T03:45:17ZengSAGE PublishingTrends in Hearing2331-21652017-07-012110.1177/2331216517722304The Benefit of a Visually Guided Beamformer in a Dynamic Speech TaskVirginia BestElin RoverudTimothy StreeterChristine R. MasonGerald KiddThe aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a visually guided hearing aid (VGHA) under conditions designed to capture some aspects of “real-world” communication settings. The VGHA uses eye gaze to steer the acoustic look direction of a highly directional beamforming microphone array. Although the VGHA has been shown to enhance speech intelligibility for fixed-location, frontal targets, it is currently not known whether these benefits persist in the face of frequent changes in location of the target talker that are typical of conversational turn-taking. Participants were 14 young adults, 7 with normal hearing and 7 with bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment. Target stimuli were sequences of 12 question–answer pairs that were embedded in a mixture of competing conversations. The participant’s task was to respond via a key press after each answer indicating whether it was correct or not. Spatialization of the stimuli and microphone array processing were done offline using recorded impulse responses, before presentation over headphones. The look direction of the array was steered according to the eye movements of the participant as they followed a visual cue presented on a widescreen monitor. Performance was compared for a “dynamic” condition in which the target stimulus moved between three locations, and a “fixed” condition with a single target location. The benefits of the VGHA over natural binaural listening observed in the fixed condition were reduced in the dynamic condition, largely because visual fixation was less accurate.https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216517722304
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Virginia Best
Elin Roverud
Timothy Streeter
Christine R. Mason
Gerald Kidd
spellingShingle Virginia Best
Elin Roverud
Timothy Streeter
Christine R. Mason
Gerald Kidd
The Benefit of a Visually Guided Beamformer in a Dynamic Speech Task
Trends in Hearing
author_facet Virginia Best
Elin Roverud
Timothy Streeter
Christine R. Mason
Gerald Kidd
author_sort Virginia Best
title The Benefit of a Visually Guided Beamformer in a Dynamic Speech Task
title_short The Benefit of a Visually Guided Beamformer in a Dynamic Speech Task
title_full The Benefit of a Visually Guided Beamformer in a Dynamic Speech Task
title_fullStr The Benefit of a Visually Guided Beamformer in a Dynamic Speech Task
title_full_unstemmed The Benefit of a Visually Guided Beamformer in a Dynamic Speech Task
title_sort benefit of a visually guided beamformer in a dynamic speech task
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Trends in Hearing
issn 2331-2165
publishDate 2017-07-01
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a visually guided hearing aid (VGHA) under conditions designed to capture some aspects of “real-world” communication settings. The VGHA uses eye gaze to steer the acoustic look direction of a highly directional beamforming microphone array. Although the VGHA has been shown to enhance speech intelligibility for fixed-location, frontal targets, it is currently not known whether these benefits persist in the face of frequent changes in location of the target talker that are typical of conversational turn-taking. Participants were 14 young adults, 7 with normal hearing and 7 with bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment. Target stimuli were sequences of 12 question–answer pairs that were embedded in a mixture of competing conversations. The participant’s task was to respond via a key press after each answer indicating whether it was correct or not. Spatialization of the stimuli and microphone array processing were done offline using recorded impulse responses, before presentation over headphones. The look direction of the array was steered according to the eye movements of the participant as they followed a visual cue presented on a widescreen monitor. Performance was compared for a “dynamic” condition in which the target stimulus moved between three locations, and a “fixed” condition with a single target location. The benefits of the VGHA over natural binaural listening observed in the fixed condition were reduced in the dynamic condition, largely because visual fixation was less accurate.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216517722304
work_keys_str_mv AT virginiabest thebenefitofavisuallyguidedbeamformerinadynamicspeechtask
AT elinroverud thebenefitofavisuallyguidedbeamformerinadynamicspeechtask
AT timothystreeter thebenefitofavisuallyguidedbeamformerinadynamicspeechtask
AT christinermason thebenefitofavisuallyguidedbeamformerinadynamicspeechtask
AT geraldkidd thebenefitofavisuallyguidedbeamformerinadynamicspeechtask
AT virginiabest benefitofavisuallyguidedbeamformerinadynamicspeechtask
AT elinroverud benefitofavisuallyguidedbeamformerinadynamicspeechtask
AT timothystreeter benefitofavisuallyguidedbeamformerinadynamicspeechtask
AT christinermason benefitofavisuallyguidedbeamformerinadynamicspeechtask
AT geraldkidd benefitofavisuallyguidedbeamformerinadynamicspeechtask
_version_ 1724510392035573760