Positive Surgical Margin in Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Incidence and Prognostic Factors

Increased incidence of radical prostatectomies in the treatment of patients with prostatic cancer (PC) necessitates analysis of causes of the disease relapses after surgery. Positive surgical margin (PSM) is considered as one of the main causes. Aim — study of the incidence of PSM in patients with a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. B. Petrov, S. A. Rakul
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: ABV-press 2020-02-01
Series:Onkourologiâ
Online Access:https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1245
id doaj-07c2a0b4935440a784149e3bbfdb4bb1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-07c2a0b4935440a784149e3bbfdb4bb12021-07-29T08:41:47ZrusABV-pressOnkourologiâ 1726-97761996-18122020-02-0121404410.17650/1726-9776-2006-2-1-40-441125Positive Surgical Margin in Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Incidence and Prognostic FactorsS. B. Petrov0S. A. Rakul1Military Medical AcademyMilitary Medical AcademyIncreased incidence of radical prostatectomies in the treatment of patients with prostatic cancer (PC) necessitates analysis of causes of the disease relapses after surgery. Positive surgical margin (PSM) is considered as one of the main causes. Aim — study of the incidence of PSM in patients with a history of retropubic radical prostatectomy for clinically local and locally disseminated PC and evaluation of prognostic factors. The incidence of PSM was analyzed in 271 patients with a history of retropubic prostatectomy, with consideration for the preoperative level of PSA, tumor differentiation and dissemination; the efficiency of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for PSM reduction was evaluated. PSM was detected in 84 (31.0%) patients. Significant criteria for PSM prognosis are clinical stage of disease, Glisson sum, and relative number of positive biopsy columns. NAT significantly reduced the incidence of PSM only in patients with local PC. NAT is indicated for patients with clinical signs of extraprostatic extension. It is ineffective in patients with locally disseminated PC because it cannot change the incidence of PSM.https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1245
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. B. Petrov
S. A. Rakul
spellingShingle S. B. Petrov
S. A. Rakul
Positive Surgical Margin in Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Incidence and Prognostic Factors
Onkourologiâ
author_facet S. B. Petrov
S. A. Rakul
author_sort S. B. Petrov
title Positive Surgical Margin in Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Incidence and Prognostic Factors
title_short Positive Surgical Margin in Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Incidence and Prognostic Factors
title_full Positive Surgical Margin in Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Incidence and Prognostic Factors
title_fullStr Positive Surgical Margin in Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Incidence and Prognostic Factors
title_full_unstemmed Positive Surgical Margin in Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Incidence and Prognostic Factors
title_sort positive surgical margin in radical retropubic prostatectomy: incidence and prognostic factors
publisher ABV-press
series Onkourologiâ
issn 1726-9776
1996-1812
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Increased incidence of radical prostatectomies in the treatment of patients with prostatic cancer (PC) necessitates analysis of causes of the disease relapses after surgery. Positive surgical margin (PSM) is considered as one of the main causes. Aim — study of the incidence of PSM in patients with a history of retropubic radical prostatectomy for clinically local and locally disseminated PC and evaluation of prognostic factors. The incidence of PSM was analyzed in 271 patients with a history of retropubic prostatectomy, with consideration for the preoperative level of PSA, tumor differentiation and dissemination; the efficiency of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for PSM reduction was evaluated. PSM was detected in 84 (31.0%) patients. Significant criteria for PSM prognosis are clinical stage of disease, Glisson sum, and relative number of positive biopsy columns. NAT significantly reduced the incidence of PSM only in patients with local PC. NAT is indicated for patients with clinical signs of extraprostatic extension. It is ineffective in patients with locally disseminated PC because it cannot change the incidence of PSM.
url https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1245
work_keys_str_mv AT sbpetrov positivesurgicalmargininradicalretropubicprostatectomyincidenceandprognosticfactors
AT sarakul positivesurgicalmargininradicalretropubicprostatectomyincidenceandprognosticfactors
_version_ 1721252314305527808