What to Believe? Impact of Knowledge and Message Length on Neural Activity in Message Credibility Evaluation
Understanding how humans evaluate credibility is an important scientific question in the era of fake news. Message credibility is among crucial aspects of credibility evaluations. One of the most direct ways to understand message credibility is to use measurements of brain activity of humans perform...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2021.659243/full |
id |
doaj-07c1e8457a4642bf85f82843622b4e5f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-07c1e8457a4642bf85f82843622b4e5f2021-09-17T12:58:27ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612021-09-011510.3389/fnhum.2021.659243659243What to Believe? Impact of Knowledge and Message Length on Neural Activity in Message Credibility EvaluationLukasz Kwasniewicz0Grzegorz M. Wojcik1Piotr Schneider2Andrzej Kawiak3Adam Wierzbicki4Chair of Neuroinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Computer Science, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, Lublin, PolandChair of Neuroinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Computer Science, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, Lublin, PolandChair of Neuroinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Computer Science, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, Lublin, PolandChair of Neuroinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Computer Science, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, Lublin, PolandPolish-Japanese Academy of Information Technology, Warsaw, PolandUnderstanding how humans evaluate credibility is an important scientific question in the era of fake news. Message credibility is among crucial aspects of credibility evaluations. One of the most direct ways to understand message credibility is to use measurements of brain activity of humans performing credibility evaluations. Nevertheless, message credibility has never been investigated using such a method before. This article reports the results of an experiment during which we have measured brain activity during message credibility evaluation, using EEG. The experiment allowed for identification of brain areas that were active when participant made positive or negative message credibility evaluations. Based on experimental data, we modeled and predicted human message credibility evaluations using EEG brain activity measurements with F1 score exceeding 0.7.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2021.659243/fullEEGcredibilitysource localizationLORETAclassifiers |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lukasz Kwasniewicz Grzegorz M. Wojcik Piotr Schneider Andrzej Kawiak Adam Wierzbicki |
spellingShingle |
Lukasz Kwasniewicz Grzegorz M. Wojcik Piotr Schneider Andrzej Kawiak Adam Wierzbicki What to Believe? Impact of Knowledge and Message Length on Neural Activity in Message Credibility Evaluation Frontiers in Human Neuroscience EEG credibility source localization LORETA classifiers |
author_facet |
Lukasz Kwasniewicz Grzegorz M. Wojcik Piotr Schneider Andrzej Kawiak Adam Wierzbicki |
author_sort |
Lukasz Kwasniewicz |
title |
What to Believe? Impact of Knowledge and Message Length on Neural Activity in Message Credibility Evaluation |
title_short |
What to Believe? Impact of Knowledge and Message Length on Neural Activity in Message Credibility Evaluation |
title_full |
What to Believe? Impact of Knowledge and Message Length on Neural Activity in Message Credibility Evaluation |
title_fullStr |
What to Believe? Impact of Knowledge and Message Length on Neural Activity in Message Credibility Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed |
What to Believe? Impact of Knowledge and Message Length on Neural Activity in Message Credibility Evaluation |
title_sort |
what to believe? impact of knowledge and message length on neural activity in message credibility evaluation |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |
issn |
1662-5161 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Understanding how humans evaluate credibility is an important scientific question in the era of fake news. Message credibility is among crucial aspects of credibility evaluations. One of the most direct ways to understand message credibility is to use measurements of brain activity of humans performing credibility evaluations. Nevertheless, message credibility has never been investigated using such a method before. This article reports the results of an experiment during which we have measured brain activity during message credibility evaluation, using EEG. The experiment allowed for identification of brain areas that were active when participant made positive or negative message credibility evaluations. Based on experimental data, we modeled and predicted human message credibility evaluations using EEG brain activity measurements with F1 score exceeding 0.7. |
topic |
EEG credibility source localization LORETA classifiers |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2021.659243/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lukaszkwasniewicz whattobelieveimpactofknowledgeandmessagelengthonneuralactivityinmessagecredibilityevaluation AT grzegorzmwojcik whattobelieveimpactofknowledgeandmessagelengthonneuralactivityinmessagecredibilityevaluation AT piotrschneider whattobelieveimpactofknowledgeandmessagelengthonneuralactivityinmessagecredibilityevaluation AT andrzejkawiak whattobelieveimpactofknowledgeandmessagelengthonneuralactivityinmessagecredibilityevaluation AT adamwierzbicki whattobelieveimpactofknowledgeandmessagelengthonneuralactivityinmessagecredibilityevaluation |
_version_ |
1717377207215587328 |