Pre Feed Aspirates vs Abdominal Girth Monitoring for Detection of Feed Intolerance in VLBW Babies
Introduction: Feed intolerance is well known in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and is linked to morbidity and mortality in Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW) babies. Most definitions of feed intolerance include one or more of clinical criteria’s viz. pre feed Gastric Residual Volumes (GRVs), col...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd.
2018-04-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijnmr.net/articles/PDF/2229/35573_CE[VSU]_F(AnG)_PF1(VSU_AnG)_PFA(AnG)_PB(VSU_AnG).pdf |
id |
doaj-07b82c7c77534b0c89174d0a31816e10 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-07b82c7c77534b0c89174d0a31816e102020-11-25T02:15:57ZengJCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd. Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research2277-85272455-68902018-04-0162PO06PO1210.7860/IJNMR/2018/35573.2229Pre Feed Aspirates vs Abdominal Girth Monitoring for Detection of Feed Intolerance in VLBW BabiesShiv Prasad Dubey0Ashish Jain1Nisha Kumar2 Anjoo Bhatnagar3Veena Devgan4Consultant, Department of Paediatrics and Neonatology, Fortis Escorts Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Neonatology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, New Delhi, India.Consultant, Department of Paediatrics, Fortis Escorts Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India.Senior Specialist, Department of Paediatrics HIndu Rao Hospital, New Delhi, India.Introduction: Feed intolerance is well known in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and is linked to morbidity and mortality in Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW) babies. Most definitions of feed intolerance include one or more of clinical criteria’s viz. pre feed Gastric Residual Volumes (GRVs), colour of gastric aspirates, abdominal distension, emesis, bloody stools and clinical deterioration (increase in apnoea and/or bradycardia) resulting in discontinuation of feeding. But clinical significance of each of these criteria has not been studied systematically. Aim: To compare the role of abdominal girth monitoring vs pre feed residuals in prediction of feed intolerance, fasting hours, time to reach full feeds, incidence of Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) II, and weight gain in VLBW babies. Materials and Methods: This prospective, two centre trial was conducted in the NICUs of two Tertiary Care Hospitals. Total 60 VLBW babies (30 from each hospital) on gavage feeding were enrolled. VLBW babies on gavage feeds at Faridabad Escort Hospital (FEH)-Pre feed Aspiration group (PA) and Hindu Rao Hospital (HRH)-Abdominal Girth monitoring group (AG) were studied. The outcome variables were vomiting, apnoea, bradycardia, fasting hours, days to reach full feeds, NEC-II and weight gain. Results: Lesser feed were found in AG group and fasting hours (p=0.015), days to reach full feeds (p=0.001) were significantly less and weight gain (p=0.02) was significantly more in AG group as compared to PA group. Conclusion: Monitoring feed intolerance by pre feed abdominal girth had advantage of better weight gain and fewer fasting hours and days to reach full feeds compared to pre feed aspiration in VLBW babies. Abdominal girth monitoring is less invasive and equally effective as pre feed aspiration.http://www.ijnmr.net/articles/PDF/2229/35573_CE[VSU]_F(AnG)_PF1(VSU_AnG)_PFA(AnG)_PB(VSU_AnG).pdfabdominal distensionfeed intolerancenecrotizing enterocolitis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shiv Prasad Dubey Ashish Jain Nisha Kumar Anjoo Bhatnagar Veena Devgan |
spellingShingle |
Shiv Prasad Dubey Ashish Jain Nisha Kumar Anjoo Bhatnagar Veena Devgan Pre Feed Aspirates vs Abdominal Girth Monitoring for Detection of Feed Intolerance in VLBW Babies Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research abdominal distension feed intolerance necrotizing enterocolitis |
author_facet |
Shiv Prasad Dubey Ashish Jain Nisha Kumar Anjoo Bhatnagar Veena Devgan |
author_sort |
Shiv Prasad Dubey |
title |
Pre Feed Aspirates vs Abdominal Girth Monitoring for Detection of Feed Intolerance in VLBW Babies |
title_short |
Pre Feed Aspirates vs Abdominal Girth Monitoring for Detection of Feed Intolerance in VLBW Babies |
title_full |
Pre Feed Aspirates vs Abdominal Girth Monitoring for Detection of Feed Intolerance in VLBW Babies |
title_fullStr |
Pre Feed Aspirates vs Abdominal Girth Monitoring for Detection of Feed Intolerance in VLBW Babies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pre Feed Aspirates vs Abdominal Girth Monitoring for Detection of Feed Intolerance in VLBW Babies |
title_sort |
pre feed aspirates vs abdominal girth monitoring for detection of feed intolerance in vlbw babies |
publisher |
JCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd. |
series |
Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research |
issn |
2277-8527 2455-6890 |
publishDate |
2018-04-01 |
description |
Introduction: Feed intolerance is well known in Neonatal
Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and is linked to morbidity and
mortality in Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW) babies. Most
definitions of feed intolerance include one or more of clinical
criteria’s viz. pre feed Gastric Residual Volumes (GRVs),
colour of gastric aspirates, abdominal distension, emesis,
bloody stools and clinical deterioration (increase in apnoea
and/or bradycardia) resulting in discontinuation of feeding.
But clinical significance of each of these criteria has not been
studied systematically.
Aim: To compare the role of abdominal girth monitoring vs pre
feed residuals in prediction of feed intolerance, fasting hours,
time to reach full feeds, incidence of Necrotizing Enterocolitis
(NEC) II, and weight gain in VLBW babies.
Materials and Methods: This prospective, two centre trial was
conducted in the NICUs of two Tertiary Care Hospitals. Total
60 VLBW babies (30 from each hospital) on gavage feeding
were enrolled. VLBW babies on gavage feeds at Faridabad
Escort Hospital (FEH)-Pre feed Aspiration group (PA) and
Hindu Rao Hospital (HRH)-Abdominal Girth monitoring group
(AG) were studied. The outcome variables were vomiting,
apnoea, bradycardia, fasting hours, days to reach full feeds,
NEC-II and weight gain.
Results: Lesser feed were found in AG group and fasting hours
(p=0.015), days to reach full feeds (p=0.001) were significantly
less and weight gain (p=0.02) was significantly more in AG
group as compared to PA group.
Conclusion: Monitoring feed intolerance by pre feed
abdominal girth had advantage of better weight gain and fewer
fasting hours and days to reach full feeds compared to pre
feed aspiration in VLBW babies. Abdominal girth monitoring is
less invasive and equally effective as pre feed aspiration. |
topic |
abdominal distension feed intolerance necrotizing enterocolitis |
url |
http://www.ijnmr.net/articles/PDF/2229/35573_CE[VSU]_F(AnG)_PF1(VSU_AnG)_PFA(AnG)_PB(VSU_AnG).pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shivprasaddubey prefeedaspiratesvsabdominalgirthmonitoringfordetectionoffeedintoleranceinvlbwbabies AT ashishjain prefeedaspiratesvsabdominalgirthmonitoringfordetectionoffeedintoleranceinvlbwbabies AT nishakumar prefeedaspiratesvsabdominalgirthmonitoringfordetectionoffeedintoleranceinvlbwbabies AT anjoobhatnagar prefeedaspiratesvsabdominalgirthmonitoringfordetectionoffeedintoleranceinvlbwbabies AT veenadevgan prefeedaspiratesvsabdominalgirthmonitoringfordetectionoffeedintoleranceinvlbwbabies |
_version_ |
1724893817117605888 |