Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review.

Citizen science (CS) currently refers to the participation of non-scientist volunteers in any discipline of conventional scientific research. Over the last two decades, nature-based CS has flourished due to innovative technology, novel devices, and widespread digital platforms used to collect and cl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mariano J Feldman, Louis Imbeau, Philippe Marchand, Marc J Mazerolle, Marcel Darveau, Nicole J Fenton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234587
id doaj-07b2ea30d63848bd99e55686c042e4f3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-07b2ea30d63848bd99e55686c042e4f32021-03-25T05:31:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01163e023458710.1371/journal.pone.0234587Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review.Mariano J FeldmanLouis ImbeauPhilippe MarchandMarc J MazerolleMarcel DarveauNicole J FentonCitizen science (CS) currently refers to the participation of non-scientist volunteers in any discipline of conventional scientific research. Over the last two decades, nature-based CS has flourished due to innovative technology, novel devices, and widespread digital platforms used to collect and classify species occurrence data. For scientists, CS offers a low-cost approach of collecting species occurrence information at large spatial scales that otherwise would be prohibitively expensive. We examined the trends and gaps linked to the use of CS as a source of data for species distribution models (SDMs), in order to propose guidelines and highlight solutions. We conducted a quantitative literature review of 207 peer-reviewed articles to measure how the representation of different taxa, regions, and data types have changed in SDM publications since the 2010s. Our review shows that the number of papers using CS for SDMs has increased at approximately double the rate of the overall number of SDM papers. However, disparities in taxonomic and geographic coverage remain in studies using CS. Western Europe and North America were the regions with the most coverage (73%). Papers on birds (49%) and mammals (19.3%) outnumbered other taxa. Among invertebrates, flying insects including Lepidoptera, Odonata and Hymenoptera received the most attention. Discrepancies between research interest and availability of data were as especially important for amphibians, reptiles and fishes. Compared to studies on animal taxa, papers on plants using CS data remain rare. Although the aims and scope of papers are diverse, species conservation remained the central theme of SDM using CS data. We present examples of the use of CS and highlight recommendations to motivate further research, such as combining multiple data sources and promoting local and traditional knowledge. We hope our findings will strengthen citizen-researchers partnerships to better inform SDMs, especially for less-studied taxa and regions. Researchers stand to benefit from the large quantity of data available from CS sources to improve global predictions of species distributions.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234587
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mariano J Feldman
Louis Imbeau
Philippe Marchand
Marc J Mazerolle
Marcel Darveau
Nicole J Fenton
spellingShingle Mariano J Feldman
Louis Imbeau
Philippe Marchand
Marc J Mazerolle
Marcel Darveau
Nicole J Fenton
Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Mariano J Feldman
Louis Imbeau
Philippe Marchand
Marc J Mazerolle
Marcel Darveau
Nicole J Fenton
author_sort Mariano J Feldman
title Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review.
title_short Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review.
title_full Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review.
title_fullStr Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review.
title_full_unstemmed Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review.
title_sort trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: a quantitative review.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Citizen science (CS) currently refers to the participation of non-scientist volunteers in any discipline of conventional scientific research. Over the last two decades, nature-based CS has flourished due to innovative technology, novel devices, and widespread digital platforms used to collect and classify species occurrence data. For scientists, CS offers a low-cost approach of collecting species occurrence information at large spatial scales that otherwise would be prohibitively expensive. We examined the trends and gaps linked to the use of CS as a source of data for species distribution models (SDMs), in order to propose guidelines and highlight solutions. We conducted a quantitative literature review of 207 peer-reviewed articles to measure how the representation of different taxa, regions, and data types have changed in SDM publications since the 2010s. Our review shows that the number of papers using CS for SDMs has increased at approximately double the rate of the overall number of SDM papers. However, disparities in taxonomic and geographic coverage remain in studies using CS. Western Europe and North America were the regions with the most coverage (73%). Papers on birds (49%) and mammals (19.3%) outnumbered other taxa. Among invertebrates, flying insects including Lepidoptera, Odonata and Hymenoptera received the most attention. Discrepancies between research interest and availability of data were as especially important for amphibians, reptiles and fishes. Compared to studies on animal taxa, papers on plants using CS data remain rare. Although the aims and scope of papers are diverse, species conservation remained the central theme of SDM using CS data. We present examples of the use of CS and highlight recommendations to motivate further research, such as combining multiple data sources and promoting local and traditional knowledge. We hope our findings will strengthen citizen-researchers partnerships to better inform SDMs, especially for less-studied taxa and regions. Researchers stand to benefit from the large quantity of data available from CS sources to improve global predictions of species distributions.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234587
work_keys_str_mv AT marianojfeldman trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview
AT louisimbeau trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview
AT philippemarchand trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview
AT marcjmazerolle trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview
AT marceldarveau trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview
AT nicolejfenton trendsandgapsintheuseofcitizensciencederiveddataasinputforspeciesdistributionmodelsaquantitativereview
_version_ 1714766287059550208