Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes among patients undergoing cesarean section under general and spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: As the rates of cesarean births have increased, the type of cesarean anesthesia has gained importance. Here, we aimed to compare the effects of general and spinal anesthesia on maternal and fetal outcomes in term singleton cases undergoing elective cesarean section.DESIGN AND...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anıl İçel Saygı, Özkan Özdamar, İsmet Gün, Hakan Emirkadı, Ercüment Müngen, Yaşam Kemal Akpak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Paulista de Medicina
Series:São Paulo Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802015000300227&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-07afba5437744b46802ca0ade8aa442d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-07afba5437744b46802ca0ade8aa442d2020-11-24T23:43:16ZengAssociação Paulista de MedicinaSão Paulo Medical Journal1806-9460133322723410.1590/1516-3180.2014.8901012S1516-31802015000300227Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes among patients undergoing cesarean section under general and spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trialAnıl İçel SaygıÖzkan Özdamarİsmet GünHakan EmirkadıErcüment MüngenYaşam Kemal AkpakCONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: As the rates of cesarean births have increased, the type of cesarean anesthesia has gained importance. Here, we aimed to compare the effects of general and spinal anesthesia on maternal and fetal outcomes in term singleton cases undergoing elective cesarean section.DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial in a tertiary-level public hospital.METHODS: Our study was conducted on 100 patients who underwent cesarean section due to elective indications. The patients were randomly divided into general anesthesia (n = 50) and spinal anesthesia (n = 50) groups. The maternal pre and postoperative hematological results, intra and postoperative hemodynamic parameters and perinatal results were compared between the groups.RESULTS: Mean bowel sounds (P = 0.036) and gas discharge time (P = 0.049) were significantly greater and 24th hour hemoglobin difference values (P = 0.001) were higher in the general anesthesia group. The mean hematocrit and hemoglobin values at the 24th hour (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001, respectively), urine volume at the first postoperative hour (P < 0.001) and median Apgar score at the first minute (P < 0.0005) were significantly higher, and the time that elapsed until the first requirement for analgesia was significantly longer (P = 0.042), in the spinal anesthesia group.CONCLUSION: In elective cases, spinal anesthesia is superior to general anesthesia in terms of postoperative comfort. In pregnancies with a risk of fetal distress, it would be appropriate to prefer spinal anesthesia by taking the first minute Apgar score into account.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802015000300227&lng=en&tlng=enCesarean sectionAnesthesia, generalHemoglobinsHematocritAnesthesia, spinal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anıl İçel Saygı
Özkan Özdamar
İsmet Gün
Hakan Emirkadı
Ercüment Müngen
Yaşam Kemal Akpak
spellingShingle Anıl İçel Saygı
Özkan Özdamar
İsmet Gün
Hakan Emirkadı
Ercüment Müngen
Yaşam Kemal Akpak
Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes among patients undergoing cesarean section under general and spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
São Paulo Medical Journal
Cesarean section
Anesthesia, general
Hemoglobins
Hematocrit
Anesthesia, spinal
author_facet Anıl İçel Saygı
Özkan Özdamar
İsmet Gün
Hakan Emirkadı
Ercüment Müngen
Yaşam Kemal Akpak
author_sort Anıl İçel Saygı
title Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes among patients undergoing cesarean section under general and spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
title_short Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes among patients undergoing cesarean section under general and spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes among patients undergoing cesarean section under general and spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes among patients undergoing cesarean section under general and spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes among patients undergoing cesarean section under general and spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes among patients undergoing cesarean section under general and spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
publisher Associação Paulista de Medicina
series São Paulo Medical Journal
issn 1806-9460
description CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: As the rates of cesarean births have increased, the type of cesarean anesthesia has gained importance. Here, we aimed to compare the effects of general and spinal anesthesia on maternal and fetal outcomes in term singleton cases undergoing elective cesarean section.DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial in a tertiary-level public hospital.METHODS: Our study was conducted on 100 patients who underwent cesarean section due to elective indications. The patients were randomly divided into general anesthesia (n = 50) and spinal anesthesia (n = 50) groups. The maternal pre and postoperative hematological results, intra and postoperative hemodynamic parameters and perinatal results were compared between the groups.RESULTS: Mean bowel sounds (P = 0.036) and gas discharge time (P = 0.049) were significantly greater and 24th hour hemoglobin difference values (P = 0.001) were higher in the general anesthesia group. The mean hematocrit and hemoglobin values at the 24th hour (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001, respectively), urine volume at the first postoperative hour (P < 0.001) and median Apgar score at the first minute (P < 0.0005) were significantly higher, and the time that elapsed until the first requirement for analgesia was significantly longer (P = 0.042), in the spinal anesthesia group.CONCLUSION: In elective cases, spinal anesthesia is superior to general anesthesia in terms of postoperative comfort. In pregnancies with a risk of fetal distress, it would be appropriate to prefer spinal anesthesia by taking the first minute Apgar score into account.
topic Cesarean section
Anesthesia, general
Hemoglobins
Hematocrit
Anesthesia, spinal
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802015000300227&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT anılicelsaygı comparisonofmaternalandfetaloutcomesamongpatientsundergoingcesareansectionundergeneralandspinalanesthesiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ozkanozdamar comparisonofmaternalandfetaloutcomesamongpatientsundergoingcesareansectionundergeneralandspinalanesthesiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ismetgun comparisonofmaternalandfetaloutcomesamongpatientsundergoingcesareansectionundergeneralandspinalanesthesiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hakanemirkadı comparisonofmaternalandfetaloutcomesamongpatientsundergoingcesareansectionundergeneralandspinalanesthesiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ercumentmungen comparisonofmaternalandfetaloutcomesamongpatientsundergoingcesareansectionundergeneralandspinalanesthesiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT yasamkemalakpak comparisonofmaternalandfetaloutcomesamongpatientsundergoingcesareansectionundergeneralandspinalanesthesiaarandomizedclinicaltrial
_version_ 1725502361906970624