A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity Models

Contemporary multiplicative plasticity models are now generally accepted as “proper material models” for modelling plastic behaviour of deformable bodies within the framework of finite-strain elastoplasticity. The models are based on the assumptions that the intermediate configuration of the body is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ladislav Écsi, Róbert Jerábek, Pavel Élesztős
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2019-06-01
Series:Journal of Mechanical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/scjme-2019-0015
id doaj-07ab5b7047534371be77aa15b7517780
record_format Article
spelling doaj-07ab5b7047534371be77aa15b75177802021-09-05T14:01:48ZengSciendoJournal of Mechanical Engineering2450-54712019-06-01692152610.2478/scjme-2019-0015scjme-2019-0015A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity ModelsLadislav Écsi0Róbert Jerábek1Pavel Élesztős2Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Applied Mechanics and Mechatronics, Nám. Slobody 17, 812 31Bratislava, SlovakiaSlovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Applied Mechanics and Mechatronics, Nám. Slobody 17, 812 31Bratislava, SlovakiaSlovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Applied Mechanics and Mechatronics, Nám. Slobody 17, 812 31Bratislava, SlovakiaContemporary multiplicative plasticity models are now generally accepted as “proper material models” for modelling plastic behaviour of deformable bodies within the framework of finite-strain elastoplasticity. The models are based on the assumptions that the intermediate configuration of the body is stress-free or locally unstressed, for which no plastic deformation exists that meets the conditions of compatibility. The assumption; however, has never really been questioned nor justified, but was rather taken as an axiom and therefore considered to be generally true. In this study, we take a critical look at the assumption from both, physical and mathematical points of view, in order to investigate whether contemporary multiplicative plasticity models are indeed continuum based and if there are alternatives to them.https://doi.org/10.2478/scjme-2019-0015multiplicative plasticity modelsfinite-strain elastoplasticitycontinuum theorycompatibility
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ladislav Écsi
Róbert Jerábek
Pavel Élesztős
spellingShingle Ladislav Écsi
Róbert Jerábek
Pavel Élesztős
A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity Models
Journal of Mechanical Engineering
multiplicative plasticity models
finite-strain elastoplasticity
continuum theory
compatibility
author_facet Ladislav Écsi
Róbert Jerábek
Pavel Élesztős
author_sort Ladislav Écsi
title A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity Models
title_short A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity Models
title_full A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity Models
title_fullStr A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity Models
title_full_unstemmed A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity Models
title_sort study on the ‘compatiblity assumption’ of contemporary multiplicative plasicity models
publisher Sciendo
series Journal of Mechanical Engineering
issn 2450-5471
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Contemporary multiplicative plasticity models are now generally accepted as “proper material models” for modelling plastic behaviour of deformable bodies within the framework of finite-strain elastoplasticity. The models are based on the assumptions that the intermediate configuration of the body is stress-free or locally unstressed, for which no plastic deformation exists that meets the conditions of compatibility. The assumption; however, has never really been questioned nor justified, but was rather taken as an axiom and therefore considered to be generally true. In this study, we take a critical look at the assumption from both, physical and mathematical points of view, in order to investigate whether contemporary multiplicative plasticity models are indeed continuum based and if there are alternatives to them.
topic multiplicative plasticity models
finite-strain elastoplasticity
continuum theory
compatibility
url https://doi.org/10.2478/scjme-2019-0015
work_keys_str_mv AT ladislavecsi astudyonthecompatiblityassumptionofcontemporarymultiplicativeplasicitymodels
AT robertjerabek astudyonthecompatiblityassumptionofcontemporarymultiplicativeplasicitymodels
AT pavelelesztos astudyonthecompatiblityassumptionofcontemporarymultiplicativeplasicitymodels
AT ladislavecsi studyonthecompatiblityassumptionofcontemporarymultiplicativeplasicitymodels
AT robertjerabek studyonthecompatiblityassumptionofcontemporarymultiplicativeplasicitymodels
AT pavelelesztos studyonthecompatiblityassumptionofcontemporarymultiplicativeplasicitymodels
_version_ 1717809557933129728