A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity Models
Contemporary multiplicative plasticity models are now generally accepted as “proper material models” for modelling plastic behaviour of deformable bodies within the framework of finite-strain elastoplasticity. The models are based on the assumptions that the intermediate configuration of the body is...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Mechanical Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/scjme-2019-0015 |
id |
doaj-07ab5b7047534371be77aa15b7517780 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-07ab5b7047534371be77aa15b75177802021-09-05T14:01:48ZengSciendoJournal of Mechanical Engineering2450-54712019-06-01692152610.2478/scjme-2019-0015scjme-2019-0015A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity ModelsLadislav Écsi0Róbert Jerábek1Pavel Élesztős2Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Applied Mechanics and Mechatronics, Nám. Slobody 17, 812 31Bratislava, SlovakiaSlovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Applied Mechanics and Mechatronics, Nám. Slobody 17, 812 31Bratislava, SlovakiaSlovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Applied Mechanics and Mechatronics, Nám. Slobody 17, 812 31Bratislava, SlovakiaContemporary multiplicative plasticity models are now generally accepted as “proper material models” for modelling plastic behaviour of deformable bodies within the framework of finite-strain elastoplasticity. The models are based on the assumptions that the intermediate configuration of the body is stress-free or locally unstressed, for which no plastic deformation exists that meets the conditions of compatibility. The assumption; however, has never really been questioned nor justified, but was rather taken as an axiom and therefore considered to be generally true. In this study, we take a critical look at the assumption from both, physical and mathematical points of view, in order to investigate whether contemporary multiplicative plasticity models are indeed continuum based and if there are alternatives to them.https://doi.org/10.2478/scjme-2019-0015multiplicative plasticity modelsfinite-strain elastoplasticitycontinuum theorycompatibility |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ladislav Écsi Róbert Jerábek Pavel Élesztős |
spellingShingle |
Ladislav Écsi Róbert Jerábek Pavel Élesztős A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity Models Journal of Mechanical Engineering multiplicative plasticity models finite-strain elastoplasticity continuum theory compatibility |
author_facet |
Ladislav Écsi Róbert Jerábek Pavel Élesztős |
author_sort |
Ladislav Écsi |
title |
A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity Models |
title_short |
A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity Models |
title_full |
A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity Models |
title_fullStr |
A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity Models |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Study on the ‘Compatiblity Assumption’ of Contemporary Multiplicative Plasicity Models |
title_sort |
study on the ‘compatiblity assumption’ of contemporary multiplicative plasicity models |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Journal of Mechanical Engineering |
issn |
2450-5471 |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
Contemporary multiplicative plasticity models are now generally accepted as “proper material models” for modelling plastic behaviour of deformable bodies within the framework of finite-strain elastoplasticity. The models are based on the assumptions that the intermediate configuration of the body is stress-free or locally unstressed, for which no plastic deformation exists that meets the conditions of compatibility. The assumption; however, has never really been questioned nor justified, but was rather taken as an axiom and therefore considered to be generally true. In this study, we take a critical look at the assumption from both, physical and mathematical points of view, in order to investigate whether contemporary multiplicative plasticity models are indeed continuum based and if there are alternatives to them. |
topic |
multiplicative plasticity models finite-strain elastoplasticity continuum theory compatibility |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2478/scjme-2019-0015 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ladislavecsi astudyonthecompatiblityassumptionofcontemporarymultiplicativeplasicitymodels AT robertjerabek astudyonthecompatiblityassumptionofcontemporarymultiplicativeplasicitymodels AT pavelelesztos astudyonthecompatiblityassumptionofcontemporarymultiplicativeplasicitymodels AT ladislavecsi studyonthecompatiblityassumptionofcontemporarymultiplicativeplasicitymodels AT robertjerabek studyonthecompatiblityassumptionofcontemporarymultiplicativeplasicitymodels AT pavelelesztos studyonthecompatiblityassumptionofcontemporarymultiplicativeplasicitymodels |
_version_ |
1717809557933129728 |