Age-Standardized Mortality Rates in the Caribbean: One Source, Three Different Interpretations

Purpose: A recent publication in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) provided the opportunity to calculate differences in published cancer mortality estimates for Caribbean jurisdictions from three organizations: MMWR, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, and the Institute for H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicholas G. Wolf, Camille Morgan, John S. Flanigan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2018-08-01
Series:Journal of Global Oncology
Online Access:http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JGO.18.00010
id doaj-079785a5d5654a0492c9a369ce5d36fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-079785a5d5654a0492c9a369ce5d36fc2020-11-25T02:10:10ZengAmerican Society of Clinical OncologyJournal of Global Oncology2378-95062018-08-01411010.1200/JGO.18.000101Age-Standardized Mortality Rates in the Caribbean: One Source, Three Different InterpretationsNicholas G. WolfCamille MorganJohn S. FlaniganPurpose: A recent publication in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) provided the opportunity to calculate differences in published cancer mortality estimates for Caribbean jurisdictions from three organizations: MMWR, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. This comparison study serves to educate end users of these data. Methods: We downloaded the publicly available cancer mortality estimates for 15 jurisdictions and the United States from the three organizations. We compared reported age-standardized mortality rates for each jurisdiction and calculated the range among estimates for each jurisdiction. We repeated this analysis after applying the same world population standard to all estimates. Results: For males, the ranges of the Caribbean estimates were between 49% (Grenada and Trinidad) and 201% (US Virgin Islands) of the MMWR value, with an average of 88%. For females, the ranges were between 15% (Trinidad) and 171% (US Virgin Islands) of the MMWR value, with an average of 64%. After all estimates were compared using the same population standard, the ranges of the Caribbean estimates for males were between 6% (Grenada) and 111% (US Virgin Islands) of the MMWR value, with an average of 34%. For females, the ranges were between 7% (Grenada) and 97% (US Virgin Islands), with an average of 28%. Conclusion: The use of different standard populations complicates comparisons across organizations. Data modeling does not completely compensate for quality of source data, as our analysis demonstrated by the differences in mortality rates despite the good quality of the vital registration in the Caribbean.http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JGO.18.00010
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicholas G. Wolf
Camille Morgan
John S. Flanigan
spellingShingle Nicholas G. Wolf
Camille Morgan
John S. Flanigan
Age-Standardized Mortality Rates in the Caribbean: One Source, Three Different Interpretations
Journal of Global Oncology
author_facet Nicholas G. Wolf
Camille Morgan
John S. Flanigan
author_sort Nicholas G. Wolf
title Age-Standardized Mortality Rates in the Caribbean: One Source, Three Different Interpretations
title_short Age-Standardized Mortality Rates in the Caribbean: One Source, Three Different Interpretations
title_full Age-Standardized Mortality Rates in the Caribbean: One Source, Three Different Interpretations
title_fullStr Age-Standardized Mortality Rates in the Caribbean: One Source, Three Different Interpretations
title_full_unstemmed Age-Standardized Mortality Rates in the Caribbean: One Source, Three Different Interpretations
title_sort age-standardized mortality rates in the caribbean: one source, three different interpretations
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
series Journal of Global Oncology
issn 2378-9506
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Purpose: A recent publication in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) provided the opportunity to calculate differences in published cancer mortality estimates for Caribbean jurisdictions from three organizations: MMWR, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. This comparison study serves to educate end users of these data. Methods: We downloaded the publicly available cancer mortality estimates for 15 jurisdictions and the United States from the three organizations. We compared reported age-standardized mortality rates for each jurisdiction and calculated the range among estimates for each jurisdiction. We repeated this analysis after applying the same world population standard to all estimates. Results: For males, the ranges of the Caribbean estimates were between 49% (Grenada and Trinidad) and 201% (US Virgin Islands) of the MMWR value, with an average of 88%. For females, the ranges were between 15% (Trinidad) and 171% (US Virgin Islands) of the MMWR value, with an average of 64%. After all estimates were compared using the same population standard, the ranges of the Caribbean estimates for males were between 6% (Grenada) and 111% (US Virgin Islands) of the MMWR value, with an average of 34%. For females, the ranges were between 7% (Grenada) and 97% (US Virgin Islands), with an average of 28%. Conclusion: The use of different standard populations complicates comparisons across organizations. Data modeling does not completely compensate for quality of source data, as our analysis demonstrated by the differences in mortality rates despite the good quality of the vital registration in the Caribbean.
url http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JGO.18.00010
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasgwolf agestandardizedmortalityratesinthecaribbeanonesourcethreedifferentinterpretations
AT camillemorgan agestandardizedmortalityratesinthecaribbeanonesourcethreedifferentinterpretations
AT johnsflanigan agestandardizedmortalityratesinthecaribbeanonesourcethreedifferentinterpretations
_version_ 1724920406920396800