Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes
Background Response inhibition is associated with successful sporting performance. However, research on response inhibition in athletes from open-skill sports has mainly focused on a consciously triggered variety; little is known about open-skill athletes’ response inhibition elicited by unconscious...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PeerJ Inc.
2018-09-01
|
Series: | PeerJ |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://peerj.com/articles/5548.pdf |
id |
doaj-078de5da278c49eaa0af020c5445112e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-078de5da278c49eaa0af020c5445112e2020-11-25T01:03:10ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592018-09-016e554810.7717/peerj.5548Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletesYihong You0Yiming Ma1Zhiguang Ji2Fanying Meng3Anmin Li4Chunhua Zhang5School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaFaculty of Behaviour and Movements Science, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsSchool of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaBackground Response inhibition is associated with successful sporting performance. However, research on response inhibition in athletes from open-skill sports has mainly focused on a consciously triggered variety; little is known about open-skill athletes’ response inhibition elicited by unconscious stimuli. Methods Here, we explored unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes (n = 20) and non-athletes (n = 19) using the masked go/no-go task and event-related potentials technique (ERPs). Results At the behavioral level, table tennis athletes displayed shorter go-response times (RTs) than non-athletes in the conscious condition. Furthermore, table tennis athletes exhibited longer response time–slowing (RT-slowing) than non-athletes in the unconscious condition. At the neural level, table tennis athletes displayed shorter event-related potential N2 component latencies than non-athletes for all conditions. More importantly, athletes displayed larger no-go event-related potential P3 component amplitudes than non-athletes at both the conscious and unconscious levels. Discussion The present study results suggested that table tennis athletes have superior conscious and unconscious response inhibition compared to non-athletes.https://peerj.com/articles/5548.pdfUnconscious response inhibitionTable tennis athletesFeedforward sweepRecurrent processing |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yihong You Yiming Ma Zhiguang Ji Fanying Meng Anmin Li Chunhua Zhang |
spellingShingle |
Yihong You Yiming Ma Zhiguang Ji Fanying Meng Anmin Li Chunhua Zhang Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes PeerJ Unconscious response inhibition Table tennis athletes Feedforward sweep Recurrent processing |
author_facet |
Yihong You Yiming Ma Zhiguang Ji Fanying Meng Anmin Li Chunhua Zhang |
author_sort |
Yihong You |
title |
Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes |
title_short |
Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes |
title_full |
Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes |
title_fullStr |
Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes |
title_sort |
unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes |
publisher |
PeerJ Inc. |
series |
PeerJ |
issn |
2167-8359 |
publishDate |
2018-09-01 |
description |
Background Response inhibition is associated with successful sporting performance. However, research on response inhibition in athletes from open-skill sports has mainly focused on a consciously triggered variety; little is known about open-skill athletes’ response inhibition elicited by unconscious stimuli. Methods Here, we explored unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes (n = 20) and non-athletes (n = 19) using the masked go/no-go task and event-related potentials technique (ERPs). Results At the behavioral level, table tennis athletes displayed shorter go-response times (RTs) than non-athletes in the conscious condition. Furthermore, table tennis athletes exhibited longer response time–slowing (RT-slowing) than non-athletes in the unconscious condition. At the neural level, table tennis athletes displayed shorter event-related potential N2 component latencies than non-athletes for all conditions. More importantly, athletes displayed larger no-go event-related potential P3 component amplitudes than non-athletes at both the conscious and unconscious levels. Discussion The present study results suggested that table tennis athletes have superior conscious and unconscious response inhibition compared to non-athletes. |
topic |
Unconscious response inhibition Table tennis athletes Feedforward sweep Recurrent processing |
url |
https://peerj.com/articles/5548.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yihongyou unconsciousresponseinhibitiondifferencesbetweentabletennisathletesandnonathletes AT yimingma unconsciousresponseinhibitiondifferencesbetweentabletennisathletesandnonathletes AT zhiguangji unconsciousresponseinhibitiondifferencesbetweentabletennisathletesandnonathletes AT fanyingmeng unconsciousresponseinhibitiondifferencesbetweentabletennisathletesandnonathletes AT anminli unconsciousresponseinhibitiondifferencesbetweentabletennisathletesandnonathletes AT chunhuazhang unconsciousresponseinhibitiondifferencesbetweentabletennisathletesandnonathletes |
_version_ |
1725202055733182464 |