Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes

Background Response inhibition is associated with successful sporting performance. However, research on response inhibition in athletes from open-skill sports has mainly focused on a consciously triggered variety; little is known about open-skill athletes’ response inhibition elicited by unconscious...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yihong You, Yiming Ma, Zhiguang Ji, Fanying Meng, Anmin Li, Chunhua Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2018-09-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/5548.pdf
id doaj-078de5da278c49eaa0af020c5445112e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-078de5da278c49eaa0af020c5445112e2020-11-25T01:03:10ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592018-09-016e554810.7717/peerj.5548Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletesYihong You0Yiming Ma1Zhiguang Ji2Fanying Meng3Anmin Li4Chunhua Zhang5School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaFaculty of Behaviour and Movements Science, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsSchool of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, ChinaBackground Response inhibition is associated with successful sporting performance. However, research on response inhibition in athletes from open-skill sports has mainly focused on a consciously triggered variety; little is known about open-skill athletes’ response inhibition elicited by unconscious stimuli. Methods Here, we explored unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes (n = 20) and non-athletes (n = 19) using the masked go/no-go task and event-related potentials technique (ERPs). Results At the behavioral level, table tennis athletes displayed shorter go-response times (RTs) than non-athletes in the conscious condition. Furthermore, table tennis athletes exhibited longer response time–slowing (RT-slowing) than non-athletes in the unconscious condition. At the neural level, table tennis athletes displayed shorter event-related potential N2 component latencies than non-athletes for all conditions. More importantly, athletes displayed larger no-go event-related potential P3 component amplitudes than non-athletes at both the conscious and unconscious levels. Discussion The present study results suggested that table tennis athletes have superior conscious and unconscious response inhibition compared to non-athletes.https://peerj.com/articles/5548.pdfUnconscious response inhibitionTable tennis athletesFeedforward sweepRecurrent processing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yihong You
Yiming Ma
Zhiguang Ji
Fanying Meng
Anmin Li
Chunhua Zhang
spellingShingle Yihong You
Yiming Ma
Zhiguang Ji
Fanying Meng
Anmin Li
Chunhua Zhang
Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes
PeerJ
Unconscious response inhibition
Table tennis athletes
Feedforward sweep
Recurrent processing
author_facet Yihong You
Yiming Ma
Zhiguang Ji
Fanying Meng
Anmin Li
Chunhua Zhang
author_sort Yihong You
title Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes
title_short Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes
title_full Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes
title_fullStr Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes
title_full_unstemmed Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes
title_sort unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Background Response inhibition is associated with successful sporting performance. However, research on response inhibition in athletes from open-skill sports has mainly focused on a consciously triggered variety; little is known about open-skill athletes’ response inhibition elicited by unconscious stimuli. Methods Here, we explored unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes (n = 20) and non-athletes (n = 19) using the masked go/no-go task and event-related potentials technique (ERPs). Results At the behavioral level, table tennis athletes displayed shorter go-response times (RTs) than non-athletes in the conscious condition. Furthermore, table tennis athletes exhibited longer response time–slowing (RT-slowing) than non-athletes in the unconscious condition. At the neural level, table tennis athletes displayed shorter event-related potential N2 component latencies than non-athletes for all conditions. More importantly, athletes displayed larger no-go event-related potential P3 component amplitudes than non-athletes at both the conscious and unconscious levels. Discussion The present study results suggested that table tennis athletes have superior conscious and unconscious response inhibition compared to non-athletes.
topic Unconscious response inhibition
Table tennis athletes
Feedforward sweep
Recurrent processing
url https://peerj.com/articles/5548.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT yihongyou unconsciousresponseinhibitiondifferencesbetweentabletennisathletesandnonathletes
AT yimingma unconsciousresponseinhibitiondifferencesbetweentabletennisathletesandnonathletes
AT zhiguangji unconsciousresponseinhibitiondifferencesbetweentabletennisathletesandnonathletes
AT fanyingmeng unconsciousresponseinhibitiondifferencesbetweentabletennisathletesandnonathletes
AT anminli unconsciousresponseinhibitiondifferencesbetweentabletennisathletesandnonathletes
AT chunhuazhang unconsciousresponseinhibitiondifferencesbetweentabletennisathletesandnonathletes
_version_ 1725202055733182464