Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population

Abstract Background Little is known about the impact of rare diseases on inpatient outcomes. Objective To compare outcomes of inpatients with 0, 1, or > 1 rare disease. A catalogue of 628 ICD-10 coded rare diseases was applied to count rare diseases. Design Retrospective, cross-sectional study. S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reka Maria Blazsik, Patrick Emanuel Beeler, Karol Tarcak, Marcus Cheetham, Viktor von Wyl, Holger Dressel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-02-01
Series:Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01737-0
id doaj-07752db8969142e09b8dcd025e3594f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-07752db8969142e09b8dcd025e3594f52021-03-11T11:27:12ZengBMCOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases1750-11722021-02-011611810.1186/s13023-021-01737-0Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient populationReka Maria Blazsik0Patrick Emanuel Beeler1Karol Tarcak2Marcus Cheetham3Viktor von Wyl4Holger Dressel5Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich and University Hospital ZurichDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich and University Hospital ZurichDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital ZurichDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital ZurichDepartment of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of ZurichDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich and University Hospital ZurichAbstract Background Little is known about the impact of rare diseases on inpatient outcomes. Objective To compare outcomes of inpatients with 0, 1, or > 1 rare disease. A catalogue of 628 ICD-10 coded rare diseases was applied to count rare diseases. Design Retrospective, cross-sectional study. Subjects 165,908 inpatients, Swiss teaching hospital. Main measures Primary outcome: in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes: length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, ICU LOS, and 30-day readmissions. Associations with single and combined rare diseases were analyzed by multivariable regression. Key results Patients with 1 rare disease were at increased risk of in-hospital death (odds ratio [OR]: 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67, 1.95), combinations of rare diseases showed stronger associations (OR 2.78; 95% CI 2.39, 3.23). Females with 1 rare disease had an OR of 1.69 (95% CI 1.50, 1.91) for in-hospital death, an OR of 2.99 (95% CI 2.36, 3.79) if they had a combination of rare diseases. Males had an OR of 1.85 (95% CI 1.68, 2.04) and 2.61 (95% CI 2.15, 3.16), respectively. Rare diseases were associated with longer LOS (for 1 and > 1 rare diseases: increase by 28 and 49%), ICU admissions (for 1 and > 1: OR 1.64 [95% CI 1.57, 1.71] and 2.23 [95% CI 2.01, 2.48]), longer ICU LOS (for 1 and > 1 rare diseases: increase by 14 and 40%), and 30-day readmissions (for 1 and > 1: OR 1.57 [95% CI 1.47, 1.68] and 1.64 [95% CI 1.37, 1.96]). Conclusions Rare diseases are independently associated with worse inpatient outcomes. This might be the first study suggesting even stronger associations of combined rare diseases with in-hospital deaths, increased LOS, ICU admissions, increased ICU LOS, and 30-day readmissions.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01737-0MortalityLength of stay30-day readmissionIntensive care unit admissionRare diseases
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reka Maria Blazsik
Patrick Emanuel Beeler
Karol Tarcak
Marcus Cheetham
Viktor von Wyl
Holger Dressel
spellingShingle Reka Maria Blazsik
Patrick Emanuel Beeler
Karol Tarcak
Marcus Cheetham
Viktor von Wyl
Holger Dressel
Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Mortality
Length of stay
30-day readmission
Intensive care unit admission
Rare diseases
author_facet Reka Maria Blazsik
Patrick Emanuel Beeler
Karol Tarcak
Marcus Cheetham
Viktor von Wyl
Holger Dressel
author_sort Reka Maria Blazsik
title Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population
title_short Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population
title_full Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population
title_fullStr Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population
title_full_unstemmed Impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population
title_sort impact of single and combined rare diseases on adult inpatient outcomes: a retrospective, cross-sectional study of a large inpatient population
publisher BMC
series Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
issn 1750-1172
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract Background Little is known about the impact of rare diseases on inpatient outcomes. Objective To compare outcomes of inpatients with 0, 1, or > 1 rare disease. A catalogue of 628 ICD-10 coded rare diseases was applied to count rare diseases. Design Retrospective, cross-sectional study. Subjects 165,908 inpatients, Swiss teaching hospital. Main measures Primary outcome: in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes: length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, ICU LOS, and 30-day readmissions. Associations with single and combined rare diseases were analyzed by multivariable regression. Key results Patients with 1 rare disease were at increased risk of in-hospital death (odds ratio [OR]: 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67, 1.95), combinations of rare diseases showed stronger associations (OR 2.78; 95% CI 2.39, 3.23). Females with 1 rare disease had an OR of 1.69 (95% CI 1.50, 1.91) for in-hospital death, an OR of 2.99 (95% CI 2.36, 3.79) if they had a combination of rare diseases. Males had an OR of 1.85 (95% CI 1.68, 2.04) and 2.61 (95% CI 2.15, 3.16), respectively. Rare diseases were associated with longer LOS (for 1 and > 1 rare diseases: increase by 28 and 49%), ICU admissions (for 1 and > 1: OR 1.64 [95% CI 1.57, 1.71] and 2.23 [95% CI 2.01, 2.48]), longer ICU LOS (for 1 and > 1 rare diseases: increase by 14 and 40%), and 30-day readmissions (for 1 and > 1: OR 1.57 [95% CI 1.47, 1.68] and 1.64 [95% CI 1.37, 1.96]). Conclusions Rare diseases are independently associated with worse inpatient outcomes. This might be the first study suggesting even stronger associations of combined rare diseases with in-hospital deaths, increased LOS, ICU admissions, increased ICU LOS, and 30-day readmissions.
topic Mortality
Length of stay
30-day readmission
Intensive care unit admission
Rare diseases
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01737-0
work_keys_str_mv AT rekamariablazsik impactofsingleandcombinedrarediseasesonadultinpatientoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyofalargeinpatientpopulation
AT patrickemanuelbeeler impactofsingleandcombinedrarediseasesonadultinpatientoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyofalargeinpatientpopulation
AT karoltarcak impactofsingleandcombinedrarediseasesonadultinpatientoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyofalargeinpatientpopulation
AT marcuscheetham impactofsingleandcombinedrarediseasesonadultinpatientoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyofalargeinpatientpopulation
AT viktorvonwyl impactofsingleandcombinedrarediseasesonadultinpatientoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyofalargeinpatientpopulation
AT holgerdressel impactofsingleandcombinedrarediseasesonadultinpatientoutcomesaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudyofalargeinpatientpopulation
_version_ 1724225562410483712