Analytical Bias in the Measurement of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Impairs Assessment of Vitamin D Status in Clinical and Research Settings.

Measured serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations vary depending on the type of assay used and the specific laboratory undertaking the analysis, impairing the accurate assessment of vitamin D status. We investigated differences in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations measured at three laboratori...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucinda J Black, Denise Anderson, Michael W Clarke, Anne-Louise Ponsonby, Robyn M Lucas, Ausimmune Investigator Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4534132?pdf=render
id doaj-07689fdaf95a468c82debbea58985fe9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-07689fdaf95a468c82debbea58985fe92020-11-25T01:47:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01108e013547810.1371/journal.pone.0135478Analytical Bias in the Measurement of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Impairs Assessment of Vitamin D Status in Clinical and Research Settings.Lucinda J BlackDenise AndersonMichael W ClarkeAnne-Louise PonsonbyRobyn M LucasAusimmune Investigator GroupMeasured serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations vary depending on the type of assay used and the specific laboratory undertaking the analysis, impairing the accurate assessment of vitamin D status. We investigated differences in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations measured at three laboratories (laboratories A and B using an assay based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and laboratory C using a DiaSorin Liaison assay), against a laboratory using an assay based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry that is certified to the standard reference method developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology and Ghent University (referred to as the 'certified laboratory'). Separate aliquots from the same original serum sample for a subset of 50 participants from the Ausimmune Study were analysed at the four laboratories. Bland-Altman plots were used to visually check agreement between each laboratory against the certified laboratory. Compared with the certified laboratory, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations were on average 12.4 nmol/L higher at laboratory A (95% limits of agreement: -17.8,42.6); 12.8 nmol/L higher at laboratory B (95% limits of agreement: 0.8,24.8); and 10.6 nmol/L lower at laboratory C (95% limits of agreement: -48.4,27.1). The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (defined here as 25-hydroxyvitamin D <50 nmol/L) was 24%, 16%, 12% and 41% at the certified laboratory, and laboratories A, B, and C, respectively. Our results demonstrate considerable differences in the measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations compared with a certified laboratory, even between laboratories using assays based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, which is often considered the gold-standard assay. To ensure accurate and reliable measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, all laboratories should use an accuracy-based quality assurance system and, ideally, comply with international standardisation efforts.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4534132?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lucinda J Black
Denise Anderson
Michael W Clarke
Anne-Louise Ponsonby
Robyn M Lucas
Ausimmune Investigator Group
spellingShingle Lucinda J Black
Denise Anderson
Michael W Clarke
Anne-Louise Ponsonby
Robyn M Lucas
Ausimmune Investigator Group
Analytical Bias in the Measurement of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Impairs Assessment of Vitamin D Status in Clinical and Research Settings.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Lucinda J Black
Denise Anderson
Michael W Clarke
Anne-Louise Ponsonby
Robyn M Lucas
Ausimmune Investigator Group
author_sort Lucinda J Black
title Analytical Bias in the Measurement of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Impairs Assessment of Vitamin D Status in Clinical and Research Settings.
title_short Analytical Bias in the Measurement of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Impairs Assessment of Vitamin D Status in Clinical and Research Settings.
title_full Analytical Bias in the Measurement of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Impairs Assessment of Vitamin D Status in Clinical and Research Settings.
title_fullStr Analytical Bias in the Measurement of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Impairs Assessment of Vitamin D Status in Clinical and Research Settings.
title_full_unstemmed Analytical Bias in the Measurement of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Impairs Assessment of Vitamin D Status in Clinical and Research Settings.
title_sort analytical bias in the measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin d concentrations impairs assessment of vitamin d status in clinical and research settings.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Measured serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations vary depending on the type of assay used and the specific laboratory undertaking the analysis, impairing the accurate assessment of vitamin D status. We investigated differences in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations measured at three laboratories (laboratories A and B using an assay based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and laboratory C using a DiaSorin Liaison assay), against a laboratory using an assay based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry that is certified to the standard reference method developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology and Ghent University (referred to as the 'certified laboratory'). Separate aliquots from the same original serum sample for a subset of 50 participants from the Ausimmune Study were analysed at the four laboratories. Bland-Altman plots were used to visually check agreement between each laboratory against the certified laboratory. Compared with the certified laboratory, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations were on average 12.4 nmol/L higher at laboratory A (95% limits of agreement: -17.8,42.6); 12.8 nmol/L higher at laboratory B (95% limits of agreement: 0.8,24.8); and 10.6 nmol/L lower at laboratory C (95% limits of agreement: -48.4,27.1). The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (defined here as 25-hydroxyvitamin D <50 nmol/L) was 24%, 16%, 12% and 41% at the certified laboratory, and laboratories A, B, and C, respectively. Our results demonstrate considerable differences in the measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations compared with a certified laboratory, even between laboratories using assays based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, which is often considered the gold-standard assay. To ensure accurate and reliable measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, all laboratories should use an accuracy-based quality assurance system and, ideally, comply with international standardisation efforts.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4534132?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT lucindajblack analyticalbiasinthemeasurementofserum25hydroxyvitamindconcentrationsimpairsassessmentofvitamindstatusinclinicalandresearchsettings
AT deniseanderson analyticalbiasinthemeasurementofserum25hydroxyvitamindconcentrationsimpairsassessmentofvitamindstatusinclinicalandresearchsettings
AT michaelwclarke analyticalbiasinthemeasurementofserum25hydroxyvitamindconcentrationsimpairsassessmentofvitamindstatusinclinicalandresearchsettings
AT annelouiseponsonby analyticalbiasinthemeasurementofserum25hydroxyvitamindconcentrationsimpairsassessmentofvitamindstatusinclinicalandresearchsettings
AT robynmlucas analyticalbiasinthemeasurementofserum25hydroxyvitamindconcentrationsimpairsassessmentofvitamindstatusinclinicalandresearchsettings
AT ausimmuneinvestigatorgroup analyticalbiasinthemeasurementofserum25hydroxyvitamindconcentrationsimpairsassessmentofvitamindstatusinclinicalandresearchsettings
_version_ 1725013904994598912