NEEDLE CHANGING AND OCCURRENCE OF LOCAL ADVERSE EFFECTS AFTER HB VACCINATION

Health professionals for adminstering intramascular (IM) injections use two usual techniques. First of all the injectable is drawn up, using a needle which is then changed with a new one before administration. The other is using one needle for both drawing and injecting drugs. It is supposed that th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Payami Boosari, N. Mosavinasab
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2004-04-01
Series:نشریه پرستاری ایران
Subjects:
hbv
Online Access:http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-57-en.html
id doaj-0755cbeb094e4a68bea21d68f18d5537
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0755cbeb094e4a68bea21d68f18d55372020-11-25T02:47:30ZfasIran University of Medical Sciencesنشریه پرستاری ایران2008-59312004-04-0117371722NEEDLE CHANGING AND OCCURRENCE OF LOCAL ADVERSE EFFECTS AFTER HB VACCINATIONM. Payami Boosari0N. Mosavinasab1 Health professionals for adminstering intramascular (IM) injections use two usual techniques. First of all the injectable is drawn up, using a needle which is then changed with a new one before administration. The other is using one needle for both drawing and injecting drugs. It is supposed that the first method would reduce pain, swelling and redness of the injection site after immunizing with Hepatitis B Vaccine (HBV). So, in order to determine the differences between these two methods, a controlled trial study was conducted, in which 39 nursing students were selected randomly to participate as the sample group and were assigned in two groups for the first and the second methods, and a follow up program was designed to check the injection site during four days. Results showed that changing of the needle would reduce redness and swelling meaningfully, with the respectively P Values of (0.04) and (0.03), and the rates of tenderness and pain were also lower in two needle technique, although, it was not significantly meaningful. To conclude, the use of two-needle technique significantly reduced local reactions in routine immunization of adult's. So, immunization centers should review their policy of changing needle before administration of vaccines.http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-57-en.htmlhbvinjectionslocal reactions
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Payami Boosari
N. Mosavinasab
spellingShingle M. Payami Boosari
N. Mosavinasab
NEEDLE CHANGING AND OCCURRENCE OF LOCAL ADVERSE EFFECTS AFTER HB VACCINATION
نشریه پرستاری ایران
hbv
injections
local reactions
author_facet M. Payami Boosari
N. Mosavinasab
author_sort M. Payami Boosari
title NEEDLE CHANGING AND OCCURRENCE OF LOCAL ADVERSE EFFECTS AFTER HB VACCINATION
title_short NEEDLE CHANGING AND OCCURRENCE OF LOCAL ADVERSE EFFECTS AFTER HB VACCINATION
title_full NEEDLE CHANGING AND OCCURRENCE OF LOCAL ADVERSE EFFECTS AFTER HB VACCINATION
title_fullStr NEEDLE CHANGING AND OCCURRENCE OF LOCAL ADVERSE EFFECTS AFTER HB VACCINATION
title_full_unstemmed NEEDLE CHANGING AND OCCURRENCE OF LOCAL ADVERSE EFFECTS AFTER HB VACCINATION
title_sort needle changing and occurrence of local adverse effects after hb vaccination
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
series نشریه پرستاری ایران
issn 2008-5931
publishDate 2004-04-01
description Health professionals for adminstering intramascular (IM) injections use two usual techniques. First of all the injectable is drawn up, using a needle which is then changed with a new one before administration. The other is using one needle for both drawing and injecting drugs. It is supposed that the first method would reduce pain, swelling and redness of the injection site after immunizing with Hepatitis B Vaccine (HBV). So, in order to determine the differences between these two methods, a controlled trial study was conducted, in which 39 nursing students were selected randomly to participate as the sample group and were assigned in two groups for the first and the second methods, and a follow up program was designed to check the injection site during four days. Results showed that changing of the needle would reduce redness and swelling meaningfully, with the respectively P Values of (0.04) and (0.03), and the rates of tenderness and pain were also lower in two needle technique, although, it was not significantly meaningful. To conclude, the use of two-needle technique significantly reduced local reactions in routine immunization of adult's. So, immunization centers should review their policy of changing needle before administration of vaccines.
topic hbv
injections
local reactions
url http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-57-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT mpayamiboosari needlechangingandoccurrenceoflocaladverseeffectsafterhbvaccination
AT nmosavinasab needlechangingandoccurrenceoflocaladverseeffectsafterhbvaccination
_version_ 1724753169154572288