Comparison between Duncan and Chang’s EB Model and the Generalized Plasticity Model in the Analysis of a High Earth-Rockfill Dam

Nonlinear elastic model and elastoplastic model are two main kinds of constitutive models of soil, which are widely used in the numerical analyses of soil structure. In this study, Duncan and Chang's EB model and the generalized plasticity model proposed by Pastor, Zienkiewicz, and Chan was dis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weixin Dong, Liming Hu, Yu Zhen Yu, He Lv
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Applied Mathematics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/709430
id doaj-07543f51cbc04bf4b6032a21e213ae3d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-07543f51cbc04bf4b6032a21e213ae3d2020-11-24T22:12:35ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Applied Mathematics1110-757X1687-00422013-01-01201310.1155/2013/709430709430Comparison between Duncan and Chang’s EB Model and the Generalized Plasticity Model in the Analysis of a High Earth-Rockfill DamWeixin Dong0Liming Hu1Yu Zhen Yu2He Lv3State Key Laboratory of Hydro-Science and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Hydro-Science and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Hydro-Science and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Hydro-Science and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaNonlinear elastic model and elastoplastic model are two main kinds of constitutive models of soil, which are widely used in the numerical analyses of soil structure. In this study, Duncan and Chang's EB model and the generalized plasticity model proposed by Pastor, Zienkiewicz, and Chan was discussed and applied to describe the stress-strain relationship of rockfill materials. The two models were validated using the results of triaxial shear tests under different confining pressures. The comparisons between the fittings of models and test data showed that the modified generalized plasticity model is capable of simulating the mechanical behaviours of rockfill materials. The modified generalized plasticity model was implemented into a finite element code to carry out static analyses of a high earth-rockfill dam in China. Nonlinear elastic analyses were also performed with Duncan and Chang's EB model in the same program framework. The comparisons of FEM results and in situ monitoring data showed that the modified PZ-III model can give a better description of deformation of the earth-rockfill dam than Duncan and Chang’s EB model.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/709430
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Weixin Dong
Liming Hu
Yu Zhen Yu
He Lv
spellingShingle Weixin Dong
Liming Hu
Yu Zhen Yu
He Lv
Comparison between Duncan and Chang’s EB Model and the Generalized Plasticity Model in the Analysis of a High Earth-Rockfill Dam
Journal of Applied Mathematics
author_facet Weixin Dong
Liming Hu
Yu Zhen Yu
He Lv
author_sort Weixin Dong
title Comparison between Duncan and Chang’s EB Model and the Generalized Plasticity Model in the Analysis of a High Earth-Rockfill Dam
title_short Comparison between Duncan and Chang’s EB Model and the Generalized Plasticity Model in the Analysis of a High Earth-Rockfill Dam
title_full Comparison between Duncan and Chang’s EB Model and the Generalized Plasticity Model in the Analysis of a High Earth-Rockfill Dam
title_fullStr Comparison between Duncan and Chang’s EB Model and the Generalized Plasticity Model in the Analysis of a High Earth-Rockfill Dam
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Duncan and Chang’s EB Model and the Generalized Plasticity Model in the Analysis of a High Earth-Rockfill Dam
title_sort comparison between duncan and chang’s eb model and the generalized plasticity model in the analysis of a high earth-rockfill dam
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Applied Mathematics
issn 1110-757X
1687-0042
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Nonlinear elastic model and elastoplastic model are two main kinds of constitutive models of soil, which are widely used in the numerical analyses of soil structure. In this study, Duncan and Chang's EB model and the generalized plasticity model proposed by Pastor, Zienkiewicz, and Chan was discussed and applied to describe the stress-strain relationship of rockfill materials. The two models were validated using the results of triaxial shear tests under different confining pressures. The comparisons between the fittings of models and test data showed that the modified generalized plasticity model is capable of simulating the mechanical behaviours of rockfill materials. The modified generalized plasticity model was implemented into a finite element code to carry out static analyses of a high earth-rockfill dam in China. Nonlinear elastic analyses were also performed with Duncan and Chang's EB model in the same program framework. The comparisons of FEM results and in situ monitoring data showed that the modified PZ-III model can give a better description of deformation of the earth-rockfill dam than Duncan and Chang’s EB model.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/709430
work_keys_str_mv AT weixindong comparisonbetweenduncanandchangsebmodelandthegeneralizedplasticitymodelintheanalysisofahighearthrockfilldam
AT liminghu comparisonbetweenduncanandchangsebmodelandthegeneralizedplasticitymodelintheanalysisofahighearthrockfilldam
AT yuzhenyu comparisonbetweenduncanandchangsebmodelandthegeneralizedplasticitymodelintheanalysisofahighearthrockfilldam
AT helv comparisonbetweenduncanandchangsebmodelandthegeneralizedplasticitymodelintheanalysisofahighearthrockfilldam
_version_ 1725803197185916928