When 'paradigms' differ: scientific communication between skepticism and hope in recent philosophy of science
The first half of this article illustrates how contemporary humanist philosophy of science got caught up in a gradual loss of confidence concerning the possibility of sound communication among scholars holding on to different paradigms or presuppositions. The second half is dedicated to the response...
Main Author: | R. Coletto |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Afrikaans |
Published: |
Scriber Editorial Systems
2008-07-01
|
Series: | Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/169 |
Similar Items
-
Is compatible the idea of incommensurability with that of scientific progress? Some reasons in support of its compatibility [Spanish]
by: Juan Manuel Jaramillo Uribe
Published: (2006-01-01) -
Carnap and Kuhn on linguistic frameworks and scientific revolutions
by: Gilson Olegario da Silva
Published: (2013-06-01) -
Thesis-Antithesis-Neutrothesis, and Neutrosynthesis
by: Florentin Smarandache
Published: (2015-03-01) -
What can cognitive science tell us about scientific revolutions?
by: Alexander Bird
Published: (2012-10-01) -
When a Thousand Words Are (Not) Enough: An Empirical Study of the Relationship between Firm Performance and Attention to Shareholders
by: Luciana Carvalho de Mesquita Ferreira
Published: (2015-04-01)