How Much Superior Rectus Underaction is Considered Normal?

Purpose:It is considered normal to have a small amount of superior rectus weakness in laevo and dextro elevation; however, there is no documented definition for these normal parameters within a healthy young adult population using ocular movement testing and the synoptophore. The aim of this study w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bethany Shaw, Charlotte Codina, Sonia Toor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: White Rose University Press 2021-01-01
Series:British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/159
id doaj-07488ccb56bd446892d6507794718888
record_format Article
spelling doaj-07488ccb56bd446892d65077947188882021-02-11T06:57:48ZengWhite Rose University PressBritish and Irish Orthoptic Journal2516-35902021-01-0117110.22599/bioj.159148How Much Superior Rectus Underaction is Considered Normal?Bethany Shaw0Charlotte Codina1Sonia Toor2Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation TrustDivision of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, University of SheffieldDivision of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, University of SheffieldPurpose:It is considered normal to have a small amount of superior rectus weakness in laevo and dextro elevation; however, there is no documented definition for these normal parameters within a healthy young adult population using ocular movement testing and the synoptophore. The aim of this study was to collect normative data on the degree of superior rectus underaction in healthy young adults. Method:Twenty-nine healthy adults (3 males and 26 females, mean age 20.30 ± 1.70 years) were recruited. Superior recti underactions and inferior oblique overactions were recorded during routine ocular movement testing and mean and median values calculated. Subjective horizontal, vertical and torsional measurements were taken in degrees on the synoptophore in primary position, laevo elevation and dextro elevation. Results:Most participants (79.31%) had some degree of observable superior rectus underaction in either eye or in both eyes on ocular movement testing (mean superior rectus underaction of –0.69 units in laevo elevation and –0.71 units in dextro elevation, range = –1.5 to –0.5 units; median –1 units, interquartile range (IQR) = –1 to –1 units). Most participants (62.07%) had some degree of superior rectus underaction in either eye or in both eyes on the synoptophore (mean left and right superior recti underactions of –0.48 degrees, range = –3 to –1 degrees; median 0 degrees, IQR = –1 to –1 degrees). Conclusion:The majority of young healthy adults in this study showed some degree of superior rectus underaction. On ocular movement testing, –0.70 units of underaction, and on the synoptophore, –0.48 degrees of underaction are the mean levels of weakness to be expected. Superior rectus underactions greater than –1 units for ocular movement testing and –1 degrees on the synoptophore in healthy young adults should be carefully evaluated, together with other important clinical signs.https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/159ocular movementssuperior rectussynoptophore
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bethany Shaw
Charlotte Codina
Sonia Toor
spellingShingle Bethany Shaw
Charlotte Codina
Sonia Toor
How Much Superior Rectus Underaction is Considered Normal?
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
ocular movements
superior rectus
synoptophore
author_facet Bethany Shaw
Charlotte Codina
Sonia Toor
author_sort Bethany Shaw
title How Much Superior Rectus Underaction is Considered Normal?
title_short How Much Superior Rectus Underaction is Considered Normal?
title_full How Much Superior Rectus Underaction is Considered Normal?
title_fullStr How Much Superior Rectus Underaction is Considered Normal?
title_full_unstemmed How Much Superior Rectus Underaction is Considered Normal?
title_sort how much superior rectus underaction is considered normal?
publisher White Rose University Press
series British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
issn 2516-3590
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Purpose:It is considered normal to have a small amount of superior rectus weakness in laevo and dextro elevation; however, there is no documented definition for these normal parameters within a healthy young adult population using ocular movement testing and the synoptophore. The aim of this study was to collect normative data on the degree of superior rectus underaction in healthy young adults. Method:Twenty-nine healthy adults (3 males and 26 females, mean age 20.30 ± 1.70 years) were recruited. Superior recti underactions and inferior oblique overactions were recorded during routine ocular movement testing and mean and median values calculated. Subjective horizontal, vertical and torsional measurements were taken in degrees on the synoptophore in primary position, laevo elevation and dextro elevation. Results:Most participants (79.31%) had some degree of observable superior rectus underaction in either eye or in both eyes on ocular movement testing (mean superior rectus underaction of –0.69 units in laevo elevation and –0.71 units in dextro elevation, range = –1.5 to –0.5 units; median –1 units, interquartile range (IQR) = –1 to –1 units). Most participants (62.07%) had some degree of superior rectus underaction in either eye or in both eyes on the synoptophore (mean left and right superior recti underactions of –0.48 degrees, range = –3 to –1 degrees; median 0 degrees, IQR = –1 to –1 degrees). Conclusion:The majority of young healthy adults in this study showed some degree of superior rectus underaction. On ocular movement testing, –0.70 units of underaction, and on the synoptophore, –0.48 degrees of underaction are the mean levels of weakness to be expected. Superior rectus underactions greater than –1 units for ocular movement testing and –1 degrees on the synoptophore in healthy young adults should be carefully evaluated, together with other important clinical signs.
topic ocular movements
superior rectus
synoptophore
url https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/159
work_keys_str_mv AT bethanyshaw howmuchsuperiorrectusunderactionisconsiderednormal
AT charlottecodina howmuchsuperiorrectusunderactionisconsiderednormal
AT soniatoor howmuchsuperiorrectusunderactionisconsiderednormal
_version_ 1724274465218494464