On-Site Participation for Proto-Architectural Assemblies Encompassing Technology and Human Improvisation: “Fish Trap” and “Orchid” Architectural Interventions

This research investigates the notion of builders’ on-site engagement to physically build architectural interventions based on their demands, spatial requirements, and collaborative improvisation enhanced with the principles of uniqueness and bespoke solutions which are previously explored in comput...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Buš, Shi-Yen Wu, Ayça Tartar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi-Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Complexity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4505064
id doaj-0738cffba49c44aaae0546b38b558526
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0738cffba49c44aaae0546b38b5585262020-11-25T03:02:48ZengHindawi-WileyComplexity1076-27871099-05262020-01-01202010.1155/2020/45050644505064On-Site Participation for Proto-Architectural Assemblies Encompassing Technology and Human Improvisation: “Fish Trap” and “Orchid” Architectural InterventionsPeter Buš0Shi-Yen Wu1Ayça Tartar2Digital Architecture Research Centre (DARC), Kent School of Architecture and Planning, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, UKDepartment of Architecture, National United University, 360 Miaoli City, TaiwanDepartment of Architecture (DARCH, Institute of Technology in Architecture), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH, Zurich 8093, SwitzerlandThis research investigates the notion of builders’ on-site engagement to physically build architectural interventions based on their demands, spatial requirements, and collaborative improvisation enhanced with the principles of uniqueness and bespoke solutions which are previously explored in computational models. The paper compares and discusses two physical installations as proto-architectural assemblies testing two different designs and building approaches: the top-down predefined designers’ scenario contrary to bottom-up unpredictable improvisation. It encompasses a building strategy based on the discrete precut components assembled by builders themselves in situ. The paper evaluates both strategies in a qualitative observation and comparison defining advantages and limitations of the top-down design strategy in comparison with the decentralised bottom-up building system built by the builders themselves. As such, it outlines the position of a designer within the bottom-up building processes on-site. The paper argues that improvisation and builders’ direct engagement on-site lead to solutions that better reflect human needs and low-tech building principles incorporated can deliver unpredictable but convenient spatial scenarios.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4505064
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Buš
Shi-Yen Wu
Ayça Tartar
spellingShingle Peter Buš
Shi-Yen Wu
Ayça Tartar
On-Site Participation for Proto-Architectural Assemblies Encompassing Technology and Human Improvisation: “Fish Trap” and “Orchid” Architectural Interventions
Complexity
author_facet Peter Buš
Shi-Yen Wu
Ayça Tartar
author_sort Peter Buš
title On-Site Participation for Proto-Architectural Assemblies Encompassing Technology and Human Improvisation: “Fish Trap” and “Orchid” Architectural Interventions
title_short On-Site Participation for Proto-Architectural Assemblies Encompassing Technology and Human Improvisation: “Fish Trap” and “Orchid” Architectural Interventions
title_full On-Site Participation for Proto-Architectural Assemblies Encompassing Technology and Human Improvisation: “Fish Trap” and “Orchid” Architectural Interventions
title_fullStr On-Site Participation for Proto-Architectural Assemblies Encompassing Technology and Human Improvisation: “Fish Trap” and “Orchid” Architectural Interventions
title_full_unstemmed On-Site Participation for Proto-Architectural Assemblies Encompassing Technology and Human Improvisation: “Fish Trap” and “Orchid” Architectural Interventions
title_sort on-site participation for proto-architectural assemblies encompassing technology and human improvisation: “fish trap” and “orchid” architectural interventions
publisher Hindawi-Wiley
series Complexity
issn 1076-2787
1099-0526
publishDate 2020-01-01
description This research investigates the notion of builders’ on-site engagement to physically build architectural interventions based on their demands, spatial requirements, and collaborative improvisation enhanced with the principles of uniqueness and bespoke solutions which are previously explored in computational models. The paper compares and discusses two physical installations as proto-architectural assemblies testing two different designs and building approaches: the top-down predefined designers’ scenario contrary to bottom-up unpredictable improvisation. It encompasses a building strategy based on the discrete precut components assembled by builders themselves in situ. The paper evaluates both strategies in a qualitative observation and comparison defining advantages and limitations of the top-down design strategy in comparison with the decentralised bottom-up building system built by the builders themselves. As such, it outlines the position of a designer within the bottom-up building processes on-site. The paper argues that improvisation and builders’ direct engagement on-site lead to solutions that better reflect human needs and low-tech building principles incorporated can deliver unpredictable but convenient spatial scenarios.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4505064
work_keys_str_mv AT peterbus onsiteparticipationforprotoarchitecturalassembliesencompassingtechnologyandhumanimprovisationfishtrapandorchidarchitecturalinterventions
AT shiyenwu onsiteparticipationforprotoarchitecturalassembliesencompassingtechnologyandhumanimprovisationfishtrapandorchidarchitecturalinterventions
AT aycatartar onsiteparticipationforprotoarchitecturalassembliesencompassingtechnologyandhumanimprovisationfishtrapandorchidarchitecturalinterventions
_version_ 1715319919078277120