Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London ‘Sink Estate’

This article offers a critical assessment of Loic Wacquant’s influential advanced marginality framework with reference to research undertaken on a London public/social housing estate. Following Wacquant, it has become the orthodoxy that one of the major vectors of advanced marginality is territorial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paul Watt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2020-02-01
Series:Social Inclusion
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2395
id doaj-0738b3045b564116883087dada49c891
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0738b3045b564116883087dada49c8912020-11-25T00:35:28ZengCogitatioSocial Inclusion2183-28032020-02-0181203310.17645/si.v8i1.23951310Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London ‘Sink Estate’Paul Watt0Department of Geography, Birkbeck, University of London, UKThis article offers a critical assessment of Loic Wacquant’s influential advanced marginality framework with reference to research undertaken on a London public/social housing estate. Following Wacquant, it has become the orthodoxy that one of the major vectors of advanced marginality is territorial stigmatisation and that this particularly affects social housing estates, for example via mass media deployment of the ‘sink estate’ label in the UK. This article is based upon a multi-method case study of the Aylesbury estate in south London—an archetypal stigmatised ‘sink estate.’ The article brings together three aspects of residents’ experiences of the Aylesbury estate: territorial stigmatisation and dissolution of place, both of which Wacquant focuses on, and housing conditions which he neglects. The article acknowledges the deprivation and various social problems the Aylesbury residents have faced. It argues, however, that rather than internalising the extensive and intensive media-fuelled territorial stigmatisation of their ‘notorious’ estate, as Wacquant’s analysis implies, residents have largely disregarded, rejected, or actively resisted the notion that they are living in an ‘estate from hell,’ while their sense of place belonging has not dissolved. By contrast, poor housing—in the form of heating breakdowns, leaks, infestation, inadequate repairs and maintenance—caused major distress and frustration and was a more important facet of their everyday lives than territorial stigmatisation. The article concludes by arguing that housing should be foregrounded, rather than neglected, in the analysis of the dynamics of urban advanced marginality.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2395advanced marginalitycouncil tenantsdissolution of placegentrificationhousing conditionsneighbourhoodregenerationsink estatesocial housingterritorial stigmatisation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul Watt
spellingShingle Paul Watt
Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London ‘Sink Estate’
Social Inclusion
advanced marginality
council tenants
dissolution of place
gentrification
housing conditions
neighbourhood
regeneration
sink estate
social housing
territorial stigmatisation
author_facet Paul Watt
author_sort Paul Watt
title Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London ‘Sink Estate’
title_short Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London ‘Sink Estate’
title_full Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London ‘Sink Estate’
title_fullStr Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London ‘Sink Estate’
title_full_unstemmed Territorial Stigmatisation and Poor Housing at a London ‘Sink Estate’
title_sort territorial stigmatisation and poor housing at a london ‘sink estate’
publisher Cogitatio
series Social Inclusion
issn 2183-2803
publishDate 2020-02-01
description This article offers a critical assessment of Loic Wacquant’s influential advanced marginality framework with reference to research undertaken on a London public/social housing estate. Following Wacquant, it has become the orthodoxy that one of the major vectors of advanced marginality is territorial stigmatisation and that this particularly affects social housing estates, for example via mass media deployment of the ‘sink estate’ label in the UK. This article is based upon a multi-method case study of the Aylesbury estate in south London—an archetypal stigmatised ‘sink estate.’ The article brings together three aspects of residents’ experiences of the Aylesbury estate: territorial stigmatisation and dissolution of place, both of which Wacquant focuses on, and housing conditions which he neglects. The article acknowledges the deprivation and various social problems the Aylesbury residents have faced. It argues, however, that rather than internalising the extensive and intensive media-fuelled territorial stigmatisation of their ‘notorious’ estate, as Wacquant’s analysis implies, residents have largely disregarded, rejected, or actively resisted the notion that they are living in an ‘estate from hell,’ while their sense of place belonging has not dissolved. By contrast, poor housing—in the form of heating breakdowns, leaks, infestation, inadequate repairs and maintenance—caused major distress and frustration and was a more important facet of their everyday lives than territorial stigmatisation. The article concludes by arguing that housing should be foregrounded, rather than neglected, in the analysis of the dynamics of urban advanced marginality.
topic advanced marginality
council tenants
dissolution of place
gentrification
housing conditions
neighbourhood
regeneration
sink estate
social housing
territorial stigmatisation
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2395
work_keys_str_mv AT paulwatt territorialstigmatisationandpoorhousingatalondonsinkestate
_version_ 1725308874191273984