Forensic mental health professionals’ perceptions of their dual loyalty conflict: findings from a qualitative study
Abstract Background Mental health professionals (MHP) working in court-mandated treatment settings face ethical dilemmas due to their dual role in assuring their patient’s well-being while guaranteeing the security of the population. Clear practical guidelines to support these MHPs’ decision-making...
Main Authors: | Helene Merkt, Sophie Haesen, Ariel Eytan, Elmar Habermeyer, Marcelo F. Aebi, Bernice Elger, Tenzin Wangmo |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-09-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Ethics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00688-2 |
Similar Items
-
Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy
by: Helene Merkt, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Incarcerated older persons’ motivation to engage in criminal court-mandated treatment: Findings from a qualitative study
by: Helene Seaward, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01) -
What characterizes a good mental health professional in court-mandated treatment settings?: Findings from a qualitative study with older patients and mental health care professionals
by: Helene Seaward, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Design of Generating Dual Frequency Operation for Triangular Microstrip Antenna Using Electromagnetic Coupling
by: Indra Surjati, et al.
Published: (2010-10-01) -
Conflicting interests: Critiquing the place of “institutional reputation” in research ethics reviews
by: Jean Daniel Jacob, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)